Startling Reactions to Trump/Bernie Signs

a reply to: NthOther

Yeah, he goes out of the way to look at her boob then has the nerve to call her disgusting. Lol, totally believable. It's fake, he used actors.

originally posted by: Konduit
a reply to: Hazardous1408

Ah, the deflection is strong with this one. I guess it makes sense when you can't form a coherent argument.

You're too ludicrous, for even a Trumper.

Who called you Hitler, snowflake?

Who deflected with an accusation of Godwin's Law, snowflake?


Poor snowflake.

a reply to: rockintitz

If he went out of his way to look, why wouldn't he get a good view? It's obviously fake, but you're desperate to believe the video in the OP so you make excuses for it not being fake.

It's possible the group of people were real, but the first guy was obviously an actor, so was the guy on the bike and the person who threw a cup of water at him from their car.

Like I said, he used actors to create fake reactions and create buzz for the video in order to bring more views to it.

a reply to: 3NL1GHT3N3D1

It's possible the group of people were real, but the first guy was obviously an actor, so was the guy on the bike and the person who threw a cup of water at him from their car. 

The only way you could prove that would to be to actually go out and try it for yourself.

Ill stick with my original point which was if you stand outside for hours looking for reactions to a controversial subject, you're gonna get enough good ones for a 3 minute video.

Not desperate either, your posts do reek of some sort of desperation to prove your point. I'm just going with the simplest answer.

a reply to: Chickensalad

I'm not surprised that the citizens of Hollyweird and surrounds all parrot the same dribble as the main stream and social medias about Trump the racist bigoted xenophobic Nazi.

Clearly those Trump haters are falling for the propaganda and feeling the burn.

a reply to: Hazardous1408

Buzzword buzzword deflect buzzword buzzword. I see Twitter really sharpened those debating skills!

a reply to: rockintitz

Here's another video exposing Salads as a faker who hires actors for his videos.



The guy is a known faker.

And if I'm desperate to prove the video is fake then you're desperate to prove it's real.

The video is made by a guy who is known to hire actors for his videos. If that doesn't raise a red flag then I don't know what will.

a reply to: Konduit

A "buzzword" I'm sure you're more than comfortable using yourself when you see fit.


Stop dodging the question, Konduit... Who called you Hitler?

a reply to: rockintitz

Yeah exactly, he was trying harder when he was holding up a Trump. How is that not obvious?

originally posted by: Swills
a reply to: Konduit

No I didn't miss it at all. The students in Chicago didn't want Trump on their campus, which he knew ahead of time but decided to go anyway. I don't condone their violence because violence always only hurts the cause. The people blocking the freeway were absolutely wrong and put many innocent people at risk. There's a right way and a wrong way to protest and not everyone gets it right.

That said, how do you feel about the 78 year man sucker punching a black protester being escorted by police? Who, btw, wasn't arrested to long after the rally ended. After he sucker punched the black man he cops threw the protester to the ground and never once looked his way. If it wasn't for social media I doubt he'd been arrested. In an interview after the rally the 78 year old said he'd might have to kill him if he sees him again.

Trump said his people were looking into paying his legal fees but then flip flopped, like usual.

Some people get it wrong. See?

The cops acted stupidly.

And the old guy said "we might have to kill him if he comes back" "could be a terrorist"

There is a right way and a wrong way, as you said.

And you are the only one that I heard say Trumps people were looking into paying for the guy's fees.

all I can say is, people shouldn't be surprised with some blowback if they are causing trouble.

a reply to: Hazardous1408

I guess reading comprehension goes out the window too.

a reply to: Konduit

You're gonna keep dodging the question, I see...

That's a shame.

A minute ago you wanted coherent argument and now here you are playing victim.


Mental note made.

a reply to: 3NL1GHT3N3D1

He called em freeloaders when he was in Trump mode? So there ya go, like Trump, he is inciting an emotional response.

But there really is no arguing with Trump supporters because anyone who supports a pathological liar aren't concerned with facts.

The people who are saying it's fake are in denial. You find this on both ends but the anti-trump types are definitely more hostile. In fact, at this point, the "left" seem to be more unhinged about Trump - almost up to Bush Derangement syndrome level. If he's elected, it's going to go to unprecedented levels in American history. He's apparently the worst person in the world. He's going to cause WW3. He's going to put Muslims in internment camps, etc.. However, the narrative is that Trump is racist and his supporters are therefore racist is just offensive. It's this type of stuff that annoys me to no end about politics. It's this bizarro world we live where people are more aggressive to others because they claim to have the moral high ground which allows them to be so vicious to others they don't even know. Well, it's all because Trump is racist. He's just like Hitler. Has it come to a point where that word has lost its meaning already?

a reply to: burgerbuddy

Cops act stupidly? A crime was literally committed right front of them and their reaction was to tackle the black man to the ground and leaving the old man to enjoy the rally. You could say mistakes were made but I'd call it incompetence.

So you admit the old man threatened to kill him but are you defending him because he accused a black man of being a terrorist? Please say no!

Why am I not surprised to hear you know nothing about Trump saying he has his people looking into it. He said that the following Sunday on Meet The Press. Then, later, he flip flopped and said he said no such thing. Typical Trump.

Blow back? The one who instigated the violence was Trump. His campaign, before the rally, tells supporters to make a scene, cause a disruption when they see someone protesting. The best example of this is a silent, standing Muslim woman being thrown out after supporters began causing a disrutpion. Then Trump tells people to knock the hell out anyone with a tomato and he'll pay their legal fees. I'm sure you're gonna tell me it was all an joke but don't bother, we've all heard it before.

There's no blowback here, this is exactly what Trump wants. His a reality TV star and media whore who knows how to play the game. He's gotten more free media coverage than any other candidate, like billions worth, and that's why he's so popular. So many of his supporters claim the media is against him but if you looked at the numbers they love him because he means ratings which means money in their pockets. He gets free non stop coverage. Trump says crazy things so the media can in turn drone on about it to get ratings.

They're using you and I. Trump doesn't care about you or America. He only cares about making Trump Great Again.

a reply to: Hazardous1408

Since you mentioned you liked reading kindergarten books I showed you one you might enjoy. I didn't say anywhere that anyone called me Hitler.

I guess it's easier to put words in other peoples mouth then make a valid argument... but I think that's covered in chapter 2.

Maybe I should have used more buzzwords to help you understand the context? Mental note made.

originally posted by: JaMeDoIt
This good news...the people are not happy...of course the alternative is sad.

The end result will be civil war with the damn Lefties acting like the abused party when in reality it's the working class that will rise up because of lowering living standards.

a reply to: 3NL1GHT3N3D1

a reply to: 3NL1GHT3N3D1

It's a social experiment. The baby doesn't need to be real dude. Just the reaction of people who think she's breastfeeding needs to be real. I guess you just don't get the purpose of these types of set ups. The situations are never real. The reactions of the public are.

a reply to: Sillyolme

My point wasn't that the baby was fake, my point was that people looked directly at the fake baby and didn't see that it was clearly fake. I know if I look at a doll from 2 feet away I can tell it's a doll, but these actors acted like they thought it was real.

I posted another video of him faking a social experiment with actors plus there are others calling him out on YouTube if you care to look.