It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
241:33:04 Conrad: Also, also, right in the center of the Earth now, we have some real bright light shining, staying on - that - that Dick's looking at with the monocular. It's really bright.
241:33:20 Weitz: Roger. Understand. Does it appear to be coming from your nadir point, which should be just off the Eastern coast of India now?
241:33:28 Conrad: Yes. Looks like it's coming just about out of the center of what we're looking at. I would say south of Burma and east of India.
241:33:39 Weitz: Roger. That's just about your nadir. [Long pause.]
241:34:11 Conrad: I can't imagine what that is.
241:34:21 Weitz: We can't either. We're checking for possibilities.
241:34:27 Conrad: It's a steady light, and it appears in size to be as big as any of the thunderstorms flashing.
241:34:39 Bean: Yes. It's as big as Venus at least. [Long pause.]
241:34:XX Weitz: Roger. Understand.
241:34:XX Bean: It's hard to tell if it is exactly in the center of the Earth or not, it's pretty close to being right in the center. Maybe just a little bit to our right, whatever that means. Just a little bit to the side that the Sun did not go behind the Earth on.
241:35:21 Weitz: Roger. I think we understand that.
http ://history.nasa.gov/ap12fj/20day10_sf3th.htm
originally posted by: slapjacks
Lens flare. Again.
Who knows though, really?
240:47:01 Bean: It's a heck of a time to be without any 70-millimeter color film, I'll tell you.
240:47:07 Weitz: ...[garble]...
240:47:08 Bean: But I know how to get it on a 16-millimeter camera.
http : //history.nasa.gov/ap12fj/20day10_sf3th.htm
241:34:XX Bean: It's hard to tell if it is exactly in the center of the Earth or not, it's pretty close to being right in the center. Maybe just a little bit to our right, whatever that means. Just a little bit to the side that the Sun did not go behind the Earth on.
originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: easynow
You'll find the whole series of Apollo 12 eclipse photography here, near the end:
www.lpi.usra.edu...
originally posted by: dogstar23
a reply to: easynow
I love this, from the transcript:
241:34:XX Bean: It's hard to tell if it is exactly in the center of the Earth or not, it's pretty close to being right in the center. Maybe just a little bit to our right, whatever that means. Just a little bit to the side that the Sun did not go behind the Earth on.
I work for a medical device company. The owner always stresses that when speaking with doctors, we should use the medical terminology, know what distal end vs. proximal end of an instrument is, refer to the various components by their technical names, etc. But here's how doctors really talk most of the time:
Doctor - "I need the forceps that's really long on the part you hold, but it has the not-so-scary looking teeth, compared to this one."
or:
(me) - For the endocervical curette, do you want the rigid or malleable?
Doctor - I need the bendy one. You can't get the bendy ones with the rainbow (she's referring to titanium coating), can you?
The source has to be reflected light off the moon imo.
a representation on the film maker's part of what they think they saw, or it is a photo of an eclipse from Earth with lens flare.
but to me this does look just like a lens flare,
originally posted by: spirit_horse
The source has to be reflected light off the moon imo. If it is that much light I doubt a UFO would emit it otherwise everyone on that side of the Earth would have seen it. I am leaning to reflected light off the water and their seeing this anomaly for the first time. Lens flare is a possibility with any optical system of the time probably as it occurs even today.
originally posted by: JimOberg
I consulted with Dick Gordon about this light about forty years ago for my seminal article in Space World, since posted on the Internet. Easynow, why didn't you include my home page in your exhaustive investigation of this story? Want the link?
Simply because it doesn't help in any way to identify the image.
originally posted by: easynow
....
Perhaps a more important question is,
Why did you present an image like that with no identification ?
And why not just go ahead and spill the beans and give us the image ID#
I'm sure you'll agree, Not doing so will seem suspicious?
originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: easynow
Simply because it doesn't help in any way to identify the image.
I think it is clear that the image in the video is one of the Apollo 12 eclipse images that has been "enhanced" to illustrate what the astronauts seemed to be seeing. Note how none of the forest fires, lightning or city lights describe in the transcript are visible in any of the photographs. The Moon's reflection was comparable to them in brightness.
originally posted by: JimOberg
You've lost me, where did I present what image?