It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I am very against religion at this point in my life. None of my friends are religious anymore and all of them think fighting in the war is the dumbest thing anyone could do.
originally posted by: reddragon2015
a reply to: DumpMaster
You do realize without religions, there would be chaos. The little chaos that religions bring is nothing compare to the chaos without it would bring. I am not religious btw, but I see the need for religions. It controls people who cannot be control by laws.
originally posted by: wisvol
a reply to: Prezbo369
See, it makes more sense when you say it politely.
I too am concerned: people worshipping their self, or explosions, tend to be #ty neighbours.
But I do respect their right to believe what they believe.
originally posted by: blueman12
a reply to: Prezbo369
I agree with you and believe that as time goes on, more people will not be religious. Mysticism may become more popular as religions are further seen as useless fairy tales.
originally posted by: Raggedyman
a reply to: DumpMaster
Stalin, Mao, pol pot, Darwin teaching we are all animals and lives have no value.
Why get upset by all this evil, why is it evil., why do you value stardust and starwater, why do you say religion is wrong, what gives you the power to dictate what's bad.
Philosophically Killing baby's and children is good, there is nothing wrong with that, lest you be against it on a faith based account
Your argument is tepid, reasoning is not logical, you apply laws that hold no merit
I ask one question, as an atheist, killing children is acceptable according to Darwins assumption of survival of the fittest
Must be, Mao, pol pot, Stalin et all did it and they were atheists, there go all atheists are like them potentially
originally posted by: Raggedyman
a reply to: luthier
Intelectualy through reason there is a form of ethics, except
The current regime in North Korea
Atheist?
The issue is not as simple as you would like to make it unfortunately, at times in human history, the elite, the greedy, the selfish, the powerful grow in power.
Can the simple argument, the survival of the fittest be denied outright, we are no more than animals to some, cattle
For the common good is generally used to support an individual's own position.
If logic can be relied on, then exterminating Jews in camps was logical, maybe not to us but to many it was
Let's not forget, Jews were a sub human group according to the political party that decided the ethics of the time
Some religions have a supernatural creator who stated, we are all human, all equal and all equally valued, you can't argue that simple statement without a secular ethic.
If you do argue that statement, you devalue humanity and life.