It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: 727Sky
As much as I used to like California their taxes on top of the cost of trying to find a place to live just ruined it for me and that was back in the late 80s. Good luck !
originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: onequestion
Housing costs are the the biggest outlay that most people have to deal with during a month. When those costs alone exceed the wages paid to the potential occupier, things are surely broken beyond belief.
However, it might be worth looking into alternative accomodation. Any bars or clubs near your preferred location, may have properties for rent in or around the building, and although nights will be noisy, it may drop the ticket price of rental by a significant enough degree, that the accomodation is affordable? Just a thought!
originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: onequestion
We are paying about seven hundred a month for our place. That's more than a grand in your money. We are not in an affluent area, we are not in a gorgeous location, nor is the building particularly brilliant in terms of quality. It is just an apartment.
originally posted by: reldra
a reply to: onequestion
I wouldn't blame immigrants, it is just a difficult pace to start if you don't have help. Even if you have help to start, rent is too high.
When I was attempting to live there is was about 1991. It is just a population intensive state.
Service jobs are plenty, I never looked into them then. I didn;t want to flip burgers or look into customer service, I was really young and 'flighty'. LOL
I imagine that if I looked into other jobs, I might have done better lol
originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: onequestion
We are paying about seven hundred a month for our place. That's more than a grand in your money. We are not in an affluent area, we are not in a gorgeous location, nor is the building particularly brilliant in terms of quality. It is just an apartment.
originally posted by: Hefficide
It's getting pretty bad in other places as well.
In '86 I left the Bay Area ( Fremont ) because I was paying $1,200 a month for a nice but pretty small apartment. I came to the northern suburbs of Atlanta and got a much, much larger and just as nice apartment here for something like $350 a month.
If one is looking to buy a house here, the market is pretty fair. There are nice houses to be found for less than 200k. Buy if one is a renter? Forget it. Nice but modest houses rent here for about what I was paying in Cali back in the day - $1,200 and up. The same type of house that I just mentioned one could buy for less than 200k. It's insane.
originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: onequestion
Sure, but where I am is not in a city. It's down by the colon of our nation, the mouth of the Thames Estuary. It's a dump of a town really.
For a proper comparison to your location, you would have to be talking about a suburb of London, or London city centre, to equal the desirability level. Even a craphole dive of a place in London will set you back much more than a grand. Probably more than two!
originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: reldra
Well, for reference, the river Thames, which runs through London, has a mouth which faces into the English Channel. It runs from West to East. So I am on the Eastern side of the U.K., on the North shore of the Thames Estuary.
Your friend lives a good bit North of me, in Yorkshire, whereas I live in Essex.