A Trump campaign gag order?

www.msnbc.com...

Donald Trump’s campaign is built around the candidate’s constant, free-wheeling interviews with the press, but media access is far more controlled when it comes to staff and volunteers. The campaign goes to great lengths to limit unscripted interactions with Team Trump, and on Thursday, a new and unusual tactic emerged.

The Trump campaign is now requiring some volunteers to sign non-disclosure agreements (NDA) before they can help the campaign — agreements that would theoretically allow Trump to sue volunteers for talking about the campaign and a process that some legal experts say is unusual and probably unenforceable.

Really, making some volunteers sign an NDA? What is he trying to hide and has this ever been done before? I mean, who has ever heard of such a thing?

And typical Trump, if any of them violate this NDA he will try to sue them but thankfully the law says he can't since they are volunteers and not employees. But he'll try anyway!

Seriously, how the hell does anyone support this clown? If Trump supporters think a Trump presidency will be transparent they better think again! He supports the NSA, Prism, and everything else that falls under the umbrella of invading your privacy in the name of security.

He criticizes Bush for the war in Iraq, rightfully so, but fully embraces the Patriot Act.

Don't think I've heard too many go on about Trump being transparent, so that bit right there is weak to me.

If you've been paying attention, Trump has a habit of suits and I think not one he's won off the top of my head. So this is him being him.

He is trying to sell the name Trump so it doesn't surprise me that he's not wanting anyone to distract from The Donald in any way. Got to keep up appearances of him being a total clown making fun of the entire system of elections and government.

He must be worried about infiltration.

Happening a lot lately.

Maybe an insurance liability mandate.

a reply to: xuenchen

How so, it may just be that I'm slow today but how does insurance factor into a NDA?

a reply to: Swills

Loose lips sink ships.

That is all.


I am sure Hillary and Bernie have them too, but the media won't report anything that is perceived to be "negative" about them except Fox News.

a reply to: BIGPoJo

Yep. I bet Hillary has an iron grip on everyone and everything Involved with her campaign.

OP:
I can see the reason for an NDA, heck I sign them pretty frequently in business. He is protecting his release of certain key items strategically. What is so nefarious about controlling your own message?

a reply to: BlueJacket

Exactly, and when they don't control the message they get criticized for lack of control of their own campaign.

Remember when there was a tweet that one of Trump's staffers sent out that was off message?

a reply to: BIGPoJo

Yep, that's the point I'm trying to make. People are so busy hating, they turn the slightest thing into some kind of omg moment to validate said hate.

a reply to: BIGPoJo

I'm sure they don't, nor do any of the other republican candidates. In fact, I'm sure this is a campaign first.

But of course you support this clown still and will defend him till the cows come home.

a reply to: Swills

Which clown do you like? Considering, they are all clowns?

Bernie never pulled a paycheck until 40, Hillary, well that's obvious, Rubio comes off as the tattle tail in gradeschool, Cruz, isn't horrible, but Trump is no worse and has some valid points, just they could of been delivered better.

Kasich is good, but I don't see how Trump support is any more subpar than anyone else.

originally posted by: Swills
a reply to: BIGPoJo

I'm sure they don't, nor do any of the other republican candidates. In fact, I'm sure this is a campaign first.

But of course you support this clown still and will defend him till the cows come home.

Killary i mean hillary dont need a NDA becaus e everyone knows when you cross her you tend to wind up suicided or dead.

originally posted by: Swills
a reply to: BIGPoJo

I'm sure they don't, nor do any of the other republican candidates. In fact, I'm sure this is a campaign first.

But of course you support this clown still and will defend him till the cows come home.

You shouldn't call your next president a clown. That's very nasty of you to call him that.

originally posted by: Swills
a reply to: BIGPoJo

I'm sure they don't, nor do any of the other republican candidates. In fact, I'm sure this is a campaign first.

But of course you support this clown still and will defend him till the cows come home.

This is another first for Trump!

Ok, you are right and now the thread is over.

Have a good one!