Massachusetts Votors Call For Arrest of Bill Clinton and Revote Over Polling Malfeasance

originally posted by: burntheships

originally posted by: Gryphon66


Actually I QUOTED "What's True."

You quoted part of it, yet left out the rest.

Whale watching, I suppose.

I didn't quote the entire article, no. Didn't claim to.

The only thing you "added" was a comment that declared the claim that "Bill Clinton definitively broke Massachusetts election law on 1 March 2016. " to be FALSE.

FALSE, you may remember, means UNTRUE, FAKE, DISHONEST, NON-FACTUAL.

You're ignoring that the State of Massachusetts stated it was unaware of any illegal activity.

There's nothing here.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: burntheships

No. Not IPhones.
Not petitions either.
Evidence.

There is plenty of evidence...

And yes I realize this is a lowly "petition".
LOL.

a reply to: Gryphon66

You left out the result, which is the word

Mixture

Do you have a problem with that word?

a reply to: burntheships

There is plenty of evidence...

Where?
Please provide evidence of illegal electioneering.

originally posted by: burntheships
a reply to: Gryphon66

You left out the result, which is the word

Mixture

Do you have a problem with that word?

Wow, do I really need to break it down for you?

True: Clinton was at the Polling Sites.

False: Clinton broke the law.

Thus, True and False ------------------> MIXTURE.

Again, try reading the source.

a reply to: Phage

There are plenty of videos, maybe you can get your
yardstick out and then get ahold of Snopes,
and tell them and make sure they remove
that Label -

MIXTURE

And while your at it, realize this is a thread on the Petition,
so until you can disprove the petition, you have no evidence.

a reply to: burntheships

And while your at it, realize this is a thread on the Petition, so until you can disprove the petition, you have no evidence.

I don't dispute there is a petition. So what?
Please provide the statute which allows someone to be arrested by petition.

originally posted by: Phage

I don't dispute there is a petition. So what?
Please provide the statute which allows someone to be arrested by petition.

I never said there was a statute.

If you dont believe there is a statue that allows someone to be arrested,
please provide that evidence.

a reply to: burntheships

If you dont believe there is a statue that allows someone to be arrested, please provide that evidence.

Oh, there are plenty of statues which allow someone to be arrested. For all kinds of things. But they require evidence to be enforced.

A petition does not cut it. No matter how much the petitioners want it to.

originally posted by: Phage
Oh, there are plenty of statues which allow someone to be arrested. For all kinds of things. But they require evidence to be enforced.

LOL...well I wouldn't argue with that. NO one will enforce it.

A petition does not cut it. No matter how much the petitioners want it to.

Yes, I think that the lowly voters have gotten that message,
one rule applies to them and one rule applies to others.

Yet, you cant deprive the voters of their petition, now can you?

a reply to: burntheships

Yes, I think that the lowly voters have gotten that message,
one rule applies to them and one rule applies to others.

So, you think that a petition should be grounds for arrest? Burn the witch! (to hell with the ships)

Yet, you cant deprive the voters of their petition, now can you?

Nope.
Can't keep a teenage boy from whacking off, either.

originally posted by: Phage

Can't keep a teenage boy from whacking off, either.

Tell that to Hillary.

You edited you post, rather than edit mine I will repond
in this seperate reply.

originally posted by: Phage
So, you think that a petition should be grounds for arrest? Burn the witch! (to hell with the ships)

LOL, I never said that, nor anything remotely close.
And I see you made a ryhme, how cute.

a reply to: burntheships

LOL, I never said that, nor anything remotely close.

Then what was the point of this?

And while your at it, realize this is a thread on the Petition,
so until you can disprove the petition, you have no evidence.

In lieu of evidence, it would seem that you think action should be taken on the weight of a petition. Or am I mistaken? Do you agree the petition is no more than a witch hunt?

originally posted by: Phage

Then what was the point of this?

The point of this is the voice of the people.

In lieu of evidence, it would seem that you think action should be taken on the weight of a petition.

Or am I mistaken? Do you agree the petition is no more than a witch hunt?

Is the petition illegal?
If not, there is your answer.

a reply to: burntheships

Is the petition illegal?

No.

If not, there is your answer.

No. I asked if you think that people should be arrested by petition.

"Pull the lever for Hillary" was a witness account, no known video exists. Bill Clinton - the voter obstructionist and walking billboard for Hillary - has nicely detailed article with sources and some legalise here: m.dailykos.com...

The petition, which I've signed, requires a Mass. address to be valid or even accepted. Sure outsiders could spoof a Mass. mailing address to be counted, I don't know what the countermeasures to prevent that level of fraud would/could be in place.

Now common sense, as the article posted above also delves into something simple - Marty Walsh can be in a voting station as he's a Massachusetts resident, Bill Clinton is not and has no right to be there.

a reply to: Jason88

Bill Clinton is not and has no right to be there.

What? Are you saying that only voters are allowed at a polling place? My daughter has accompanied me to the polls on several occasions. She is too young to vote. Does that mean she has no right to be there?

Or do I misunderstand? Are you saying that Bill Clinton has no right to be in Massachusetts at all?

a reply to: Phage Splitting hairs, Phage. It's not clear if he can be there since he's not a resident, but let me ask you : why is he there then?

a reply to: Jason88

t's not clear if he can be there since he's not a resident

Actually, unless you can provide a statute to the contrary, it is quite clear. Unless it is illegal, it is legal. That's the way it works here.

Unless you can provide evidence of illegal electioneering. I mean, come on, with all those signatures, just one claim of what he said?

Were all of those 100,000 at the polling place? They all saw him there? Saying "vote Hillary!"



BTW, I don't particularly care for either of the Clintons. I just have a profound distaste for witch hunts.