Holy Bible: The best English translation ever

a reply to: chr0naut

please let me interject with the preserve word of God

Ex 6:3 And I appeared unto Abraham, unto Isaac, and unto Jacob, by the name of God Almighty, but by my name JEHOVAH was I not known to them.

For those who want the interlinear version

Ex 6:3 And I appeared unto Isaac, and unto Jacob, by the name of God 'el Almighty, Shadday but by my name shem JEHOVAH Yehovah was I not known yada` to them.

originally posted by: ChesterJohn
a reply to: chr0naut

please let me interject with the preserve word of God

Ex 6:3 And I appeared unto Abraham, unto Isaac, and unto Jacob, by the name of God Almighty, but by my name JEHOVAH was I not known to them.

For those who want the interlinear version

Ex 6:3 And I appeared unto Isaac, and unto Jacob, by the name of God 'el Almighty, Shadday but by my name shem JEHOVAH Yehovah was I not known yada` to them.

Looks like I agree with the word of God. Cheerz.

originally posted by: Caligula
a reply to: BELIEVERpriest

Your insolence makes your frustration apparent, your weak insult makes your character flaws even more apparent.

Frustration? Yes....with your arrogance, so we can call it even.

originally posted by: ChesterJohn
a reply to: Lazarus Short

the preserved word of God, the Authorized Holy Bible 1611

Are you serious? It was authorized by a very carnal King, translated by a committee, and contains the very mistaken (and pagan) terms "Hades" and "Hell," which has turned millions against a God who they think relegates the lost to such a place. The 1611 KJV also renders the name of God as "LORD," while spelling out the names of all and sundry pagan deities. Only the original autographs, in their original languages, are the Word of God. Even the KJV lacks the long-lost, now-found "lost chapters" of Acts. Can you say "Imperfect"? Yowza!

a reply to: Lazarus ShortThey were long lost for a reason and are not part of God's preserved word. believe what you want

originally posted by: ChesterJohn
a reply to: Lazarus ShortThey were long lost for a reason and are not part of God's preserved word. believe what you want

So you're going to only answer what you can easily dismiss? Typical. BTW, have you read or even heard of, the lost chapters of Acts?

a reply to: Lazarus Short

Yes I have, and I can see why it was rejected. Some of the people who believe in british-israelism want this to be a genuine.

For me it failed the life in the word test. It also lacks the style of Luke and had to be written by someone else and it is set in a more Pauline individualism than the rest of the book of Acts instead of being a Genuine Narrative form as is the rest of the book. It promotes doctrine Paul never taught, and none of it has any type of connection to the Holy Bible showing the Holy Ghost teaching by caparison of spiritual thing with spiritual things

I highly doubt it is part of the Original book of acts as God would have preserved it into a Bible version in English long before now.

originally posted by: ChesterJohn
a reply to: Lazarus Short

Yes I have, and I can see why it was rejected. Some of the people who believe in british-israelism want this to be a genuine.

For me it failed the life in the word test. It also lacks the style of Luke and had to be written by someone else and it is set in a more Pauline individualism than the rest of the book of Acts instead of being a Genuine Narrative form as is the rest of the book. It promotes doctrine Paul never taught, and none of it has any type of connection to the Holy Bible showing the Holy Ghost teaching by caparison of spiritual thing with spiritual things

I highly doubt it is part of the Original book of acts as God would have preserved it into a Bible version in English long before now.

Now that is a good, well-thought answer. You still refuse to come to grips with my 1611 comments - don't think I don't notice. Dealing with only the weakest of several arguments is a time-honored ATS tradition.

a reply to: Lazarus Short

Because that issue is settled for me about 13 years ago. I have already said why I believe it and nothing will change my mind about the AV.

OK, I'll not argue further. Peace to you.

None of them. They are all so horribly wrong, they aren't worth reading. You need to translate from the original Hebrew and Greek. And even then, you have to correct the corruption to those languages to understand what is written beneath it.

For instance GENESIS 49

Judah is a lion's whelp: from the prey, my son, thou art gone up: he stooped down, he couched as a lion, and as an old lion; who shall rouse him up?

CORRECTED VERSION
Honour the Sphinx's warning regarding the pyramids (beni בְּנִ֣י is 'Pyramids', not 'son'). It lays before them now, as it lay before them in ancient times, it should be shown respect.

Or again, in GENESIS 49

O my soul, come not thou into their secret; unto their assembly, mine honour, be not thou united: for in their anger they slew a man, and in their selfwill they digged down a wall.

CORRECTED VERSION
So that nobody would know what they knew (their secret) and all would have to assemble before them, they cruelly carved the face of a man (on the Sphinx), and insolently buried what lay below (the subterranean chamber in the pyramid of Khufu).

GENESIS 49 actually tells about them ignoring the warning of the Sphinx, taking the writings hidden in the chamber (subterranean) beneath Khufu, which are where THE BIBLE came from, then filling in the chamber so nobody would know where it was stolen from.

They were able to literally STEAL their Churches foundations thanks to good old SIMON PETER.

Simon Peter: He who hears, stone.

Or more correctly: HE WHO TRANSLATED THE HIEROGLYPHS

You will only find lies and mistranslations in the English versions.

Don't bother, if you want truth.

a reply to: IamSandSHEisB

How can you uses unverifiable copies to translate from?

We have no originals. We know what the languages are but none of us speak them and the traditions of the speech is lost also.

But God said he would preserve his words forever (ps 12:6.7) so there is one Bible out there that is the preserved word of God. With all his words just the way they were in the originals autographs.

originally posted by: ChesterJohn
... so there is one Bible out there that is the preserved word of God. With all his words just the way they were in the originals autographs.

Oh, sure, in the 1611, God made certain that His Name was reduced to "LORD," while the names of all the pagan gods got transliterated, something He forbade His people to do. [sarcasm]

Further, God made sure the 1611 contained the pagan terms "Hades" and "Hell," places for which I can find no evidence in my KJV. The Norse/Teutonic/Saxon "Hel" is pagan - BUT - "Hell" is Christian? Not to this Christian. Ha Ha Ha Whatever happened to the proper Hebrew term "sheol?"

I know I promised not to argue further: the above is not an argument.

originally posted by: Lazarus Short

originally posted by: ChesterJohn
... so there is one Bible out there that is the preserved word of God. With all his words just the way they were in the originals autographs.

Oh, sure, in the 1611, God made certain that His Name was reduced to "LORD," while the names of all the pagan gods got transliterated, something He forbade His people to do. [sarcasm]

Further, God made sure the 1611 contained the pagan terms "Hades" and "Hell," places for which I can find no evidence in my KJV. The Norse/Teutonic/Saxon "Hel" is pagan - BUT - "Hell" is Christian? Not to this Christian. Ha Ha Ha Whatever happened to the proper Hebrew term "sheol?"

I know I promised not to argue further: the above is not an argument.

It's ok.

How do you know for sure?

Do you have an actual whole and complete original?

I will even settle for part of an original.

The problem is we have no originals to prove any of the copies are accurate. We weren't there and no original has survived.

All I know is God made a promise to preserve his words and I believe he has. If he hasn't then all the Bibles are junk and we should burn them all and just find something else to fill our lives with. Instead of trying to live Godly and upright.

If God can't keep his word how can we trust him to give us salvation through his son?

Paul said and the same could be said for the rest of the scriptures

1Co 15:19 If in this life only we have hope in Christ, we are of all men most miserable.

If all we have are error filled Bibles we have nothing to stand on.

But if God kept his words as he promised and preserved to our generation then we just need to find it. It will have his signature upon it and we can hold it in our hands and quotes it and believe it.

Stop trusting in what men say and trust God in what has said.

a reply to: ChesterJohn

Even the corrupt Bibles have God's Light shining from them. The Satanic Bible, um, no.

You do know that the Bible is the best-preserved document which has come down to us from antiquity, right?

The KJV, 1611 or otherwise, is much better than a LOT of modern versions, but it is not perfect, as I have pointed out.

Ivan Panin promoted the idea that the original text, comparable to the autograph, could be arrived at mathematically, but his Numerical Bible is nearly impossible to find.

I used to be a KJV loyalist myself, as was my father.

a reply to: IamSandSHEisB

I am intrigued by what you say, I need to know how you learned this so I can verify it. Personally, I don't believe that the Jews were ever slaves in Egypt so I find it hard to believe that the bible mentioned the pyramids and they left it out of the translations. That's evidence that they were there, why would they leave that out?

The human face of the sphinx is one of the most hideous acts of vandalism in history but people are saying it was Annubis and not a lion now, but who knows. I do know that the face of the sphinx was of a black African which is why the nose was blasted off.

a reply to: SerapisChrist

It was a Lions head. If it were Anubis, the shape of the body would be different. Consistent with other canine depictions.

Any time you see BENI, BENAI, etc, in the Bible and they say it means 'Sons' or 'Sons of'. It actually means Pyramid. Still to this day they call pyramid peaks 'BenBen' (Google 'Benben').

How did I get this translation? I took the Westminster Leningrad Codex, studied the arcane meanings of the lettering and the inflections, then adapted/corrected their meanings. Reconstructed the sentences so they made sense. Or at the very least are far closer than any current translation.

If you compare my translations to the originals (biblehub.com/text/genesis/49-1.htm), they are nearly identical, except that mine make sense. Theirs don't.

I also have a ... lets say "very direct" .. link to Egyptian history which helps me understand it better than others can.

Wanna know what the Pyramids are? They are very powerful resonant oscillators which distribute Ionic energy from the atmosphere, through the ground. Electricity was then drawn through the ground from the pyramids through dialectic diffusion.

Tesla worked this out. His Wycliffe tower worked in the same way as the pyramids. That's where he got the idea.

As long as there is a ionic source, you can draw electricity using dialectic diffusion through the sources oscillating frequency. Telsa a conductive torus on top of the towers as his source.

Beneath the subterranean chamber of the pyramid is a large chamber with engravings on every wall. The first books of what we today call 'The Bible'.

Once they translated these, they filled in the chamber with loose rock and sand, so no-one would know where the books came from. So nobody could question the authority of their 're-legion'.

Then they lied and said that the filled in floor of the chamber was excavation that was 'unfinished'.

Which is ridiculous when you consider that the pyramids were built from the ground up.

I will tell you more in private message. So I don't hijack the thread.

a reply to: IamSandSHEisB
Im guessing you have an akashic connection of sorts, but I am intrigued. Only, benai Elohim means son's of the gods, your saying it is really Pyramids of the gods? That would make the pyramids sons of the gods, that's giving me a headache just thinking about it. But I am a big Tesla fan, I mean, an anti-capitalist who invented A/C, the man is a scientific god.

Elohim means, "Higher energy"

That's why it is said to have a root meaning in "exceeding, very great, mighty". It is referring to a higher or greater energy source. The translation of 'God' is wrong.

If you were to connect your phone to a wall socket to charge it, technically ... the wall socket is Elohim as it is the 'higher energy' source for the phones battery.

The pyramids work drawing energy from the ion field as I said. Which is Elohim. Benai Elohim is "Pyramids of Power" Or more accurately modified, "Power pyramids".

And yes, I have what some would call Akashic connection. I get things like schematics for free energy machines. Cures for diseases, everything. But nobody ever listens to me. EVER!

Its like having the keys to unlock any door I want, but its pointless, because nobody ever wants to walk through them.

I sometimes wonder if anyone but me in this world is even real. If they are, I don't think there is many of us.

a reply to: IamSandSHEisB

My Akashic connection never tells me anything that isn't spiritual, I feel a strong connection to Spitama Zarathustra and Gnosticism, same religion, really.

I was never science oriented, nevertheless, I believe you. Tesla always gets my attention, I like to meditate on 3,6,9, which he said was important for some reason.

Where do you think the Great pyramids capstone is? I always felt that if it was ever recapped something amazing would happen.

But you have provided me with interesting info, I did google benben. I have more research to do which is good because I was running out of interesting things to investigate.

Thank you!