It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Raxoxane
a reply to: Antipathy17
Well if there's no Real racism from whites against blacks,it seems some will Have to be fabricated..lest victimhood be lost,and sympathy,and support.. and some actually have to gain what they want in life through hard work,sacrifice and strength of character and personality..shudders..the horror..The Horror..
originally posted by: SaturnFX
originally posted by: chuck258
I would be interested in hearing some of our most vocal local Liberals on this board trying to defend these despicable actions. You guys all come out of the woodwork when you hear cases of injustice faced by Blacks,
Awesome generalization.
I think you are discussing progressives. they aren't liberals..they pretend to be in the same way a theocrat pretends to be conservative
originally posted by: Gryphon66
Let's see if I've got the general logic down correctly here ...
Three racist girls acted up on a bus, then tried to turn the situation around on innocent people, got caught at their deception and are now facing charges for false reporting and assault.
And that means that every report of racism and/or hate crime is also false, particularly if made by Blacks, and further, that White Americans are really the only ones being oppressed and assaulted, every day, everywhere across America.
That about right?
If you can read,if you can hear,and if you have enough braincells to consolidate what you see and hear,into a cohesive deduction,it is crystal clear that there are many black people who are happy to play the race card and victim card-in Your country And in mine.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: chuck258
President Washington agreed with you.
Also, we'd need to define progressive, liberal, left, as they truly do not mean the same things, except in political rhetoric.
originally posted by: chuck258
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: chuck258
President Washington agreed with you.
Also, we'd need to define progressive, liberal, left, as they truly do not mean the same things, except in political rhetoric.
You're right, and I addressed that point. I would edit it if I could. I often interchange the two because they so often go hand in hand.
The unity of government which constitutes you one people is also now dear to you. It is justly so, for it is a main pillar in the edifice of your real independence, the support of your tranquility at home, your peace abroad; of your safety; of your prosperity; of that very liberty which you so highly prize.
But as it is easy to foresee that, from different causes and from different quarters, much pains will be taken, many artifices employed to weaken in your minds the conviction of this truth; as this is the point in your political fortress against which the batteries of internal and external enemies will be most constantly and actively (though often covertly and insidiously) directed, it is of infinite moment that you should properly estimate the immense value of your national union to your collective and individual happiness; that you should cherish a cordial, habitual, and immovable attachment to it; accustoming yourselves to think and speak of it as of the palladium of your political safety and prosperity; watching for its preservation with jealous anxiety; discountenancing whatever may suggest even a suspicion that it can in any event be abandoned; and indignantly frowning upon the first dawning of every attempt to alienate any portion of our country from the rest, or to enfeeble the sacred ties which now link together the various parts.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
The FBI keeps tallies on all reported "hate crimes" available on their website.
In 2014 for example, there were 3081 offenses based on race according to this table.
So, who knows how that breaks down but let's say it's evenly, so in the month since this event if 2016 is similar to 2014 there will have been around 250 offenses, qualifying as hate crime based on race during this period.
Yet, this one incident motivates the idea that these reports are just "more false accusations" ... ie. (not squinting at it too hard) "yet another false" accusation"
Doesn't this present a logical problem for anyone?
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: RedDragon
The FBI reported cases?
I'm unsure of how to best respond.
Is the FBI making them up?
What does "common sense" tell you?