WikiLeaks Publishes Classified TOP-SECRET COMINT-GAMMA Documents.

a reply to: Kapusta

You cannot link WL on ATS... its the way it is...

originally posted by: purplemer
a reply to: Kapusta

You cannot link WL on ATS... its the way it is...

Yes i am aware of that now

a reply to: Kapusta


I would be less concerned about this type of spying if the world outside of the US was able to sustain itself in a suitable manner without our help in some fashion. That hasn't be the case since well before my lifetime or my father's. If we are to be the parent, or hovering master, we damned well need to know what games the players are playing with each other because invariably, we'll be asked to donate blood and cash and not just mediate.

a reply to: Kapusta

A new release... Assange must be low on cash. Of course its also possible this happened because the UK and Sweden demonstrated that the UN has no authority to do some of the things it does, like trying to interfere in their judicial systems.

a reply to: Kapusta

" Back in 2010 we revealed that the then US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton had ordered her diplomats to steal the UN leadership's biometric data and other information."

That has got to cement her push for the Presidency ...

originally posted by: chrismarco
a reply to: Kapusta

I guess for the average person there might be some shock...do folks really think we are the only country that spies on other countries including our allies? Don't be so foolish to think so..

Spying is no surprise,but if you're good you don't get caught at it.

What I really wonder about though is why do they need "to steal the Secretary General’s DNA"? That seems beyond spying and I don't understand the purpose.

Does anyone else get the feeling that the US is going to find itself collapsing up against a wall pressed against by a coalition of nations fed up with their rule? Vilification of the Saudis in recent months makes me think the US is going to pull a trump card by saying the Saudis were behind 9/11, temporarily take the heat off the US.

a reply to: Arbitrageur

What I really wonder about though is why do they need "to steal the Secretary General’s DNA"? That seems beyond spying and I don't understand the purpose.

What is biometric data:

www.webopedia.com...

A general term used to refer to any computer data that is created during a biometric process. This includes samples, models, fingerprints, similarity scores and all verification or identification data excluding the individual's name and demographics.

(n.) Biometrics generally refers to the study of measurable biological characteristics. In computer security, biometrics refers to authentication techniques that rely on measurable physical characteristics that can be automatically checked.
There are several types of biometric identification schemes:
face: the analysis of facial characteristics
fingerprint: the analysis of an individual's unique fingerprints
hand geometry: the analysis of the shape of the hand and the length of the fingers
retina: the analysis of the capillary vessels located at the back of the eye
iris: the analysis of the colored ring that surrounds the eye's pupil
signature: the analysis of the way a person signs his name.
vein: the analysis of pattern of veins in the back if the hand and the wrist
voice: the analysis of the tone, pitch, cadence and frequency of a person's voice.
Though the field is still in its infancy, many people believe that biometrics will play a critical role in future computers, and especially in electronic commerce.

If this be real all I can say is:
THANK GOD!!
Imagine if all the secrets were laid bare about our rulers.
Once again the people could regain control of their own destinies.
This could be a game changer.
We did it in the 60's and brought the government to a screeching halt.
It can be done again.

a reply to: SargonThrall

Yes and no.

We (America) are the blunt instrument. We are needed by our allies, despite how much they hate some of the stuff we do. They "allow" and "enable" the USA to do what it does, so they can keep their hands clean.

a reply to: Kapusta

It will be interesting to see the UN's reaction, because if the United Nations Secretary General, whose communications and person have legal inviolability, can be repeatedly attacked without consequence then everyone is at risk."

Bye.


Maybe this is preparation for the Trump presidency. More USA and less one world governance.

a reply to: Semicollegiate

The "NWO" has always been about turning the rest of the world INTO America. It's pretty obvious via capitalism that's what the globalists have been doing.

The seeds of a one world government have been spreading for decades via American culture, peddled overseas through capitalism.

originally posted by: Kapusta

originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: Kapusta

The server cannot be found at present... Somewhat concerning is it not?

Apparently ATS doesn't Allow anything from WikiLeaks to be linked here ....

It is concerning ..

No, it's actually very nice of them. Thanks, amigos.

Some of us can't look at that stuff. And if it's there and we don't know it's there, then we end up filling out forms.

Think of it as NSFW porn for a segment of ATSites.

a reply to: Bedlam

Couldn't people in your field still get in trouble for clicking on threads with information about the content of these leaks though?

a reply to: SargonThrall

Do you find it weird that oddly enough Turkey is making moves and funding Isis and the Saudis recently claimed to have nukes from Pakistan?

Please correct me if I'm wrong.

originally posted by: daaskapital
a reply to: Bedlam

Couldn't people in your field still get in trouble for clicking on threads with information about the content of these leaks though?

As long as you don't quote a lot of it, that's not the source material. It has a lot of similarity to angels dancing on pinheads.

originally posted by: Bedlam

originally posted by: daaskapital
a reply to: Bedlam

Couldn't people in your field still get in trouble for clicking on threads with information about the content of these leaks though?

As long as you don't quote a lot of it, that's not the source material. It has a lot of similarity to angels dancing on pinheads.

WTF haha

a reply to: Bedlam

It seems ridiculous that you can get in trouble for information that is publicly available. (Even if it's classified.) I'd like to think there's some reason for allowing you to know what it is as long as you don't directly read the source material, but I know how stupid and asinine governments tend to be.

a reply to: Eilasvaleleyn

There are, occasionally and briefly, books in print I am technically not supposed to read. This is pretty ridiculous, and generally gets retracted pretty fast, but security wonks are concrete thinkers with no sense of proportion. As a rule, I wouldn't go near wikileaks with YOUR computer, though.

I am really curious to see how this will effect relationships between the US and other country's. If i had to guess the ripple effect from This will be short lived

Not much is the answer to that. Those 'leaders' are too busy whining about what Trump says.

Rather than the current government spying on them.

Talk about out of whack 'priorities'.