Study Reveals Stunning Acceleration of Sea Level Rise

a reply to: gmoneystunt

Prove what? That some heat makes it through the upper atmosphere and gets trapped here? That is literally the base driving model of all climate science, natural or man made.

a reply to: Krazysh0t

The stronger the upper atmosphere the less heat or cold will get through to begin with. Lets have an experiment. You can sleep in cold weather with saran wrap while I sleep with a solar blanket. We can see who wins. Yea some cold will get through but who will be better off?

originally posted by: gmoneystunt
a reply to: Krazysh0t

The stronger the upper atmosphere the less heat will get through to begin with. Lets have an experiment. You can sleep in cold weather with saran wrap while I sleep with a solar blanket. We can see who wins. Yea some cold will get through but who will be better off?

By your same rationale, Venus must be cold as ice right? After all, it's atmosphere is almost ALL CO2.

In any case, we are off topic. This conversation has nothing to do with proving or disproving man-made climate change.

a reply to: Krazysh0t

Was your thread mainly about Rising Sea Levels or pushing your Global Warming Agenda?

Either way, Have a good day

originally posted by: gmoneystunt
a reply to: Krazysh0t

Was your thread mainly about Rising Sea Levels or pushing your Global Warming Agenda?

Either way, Have a good day

Regardless of what it was about, you weren't talking about either of those topics with your line of reasoning.

originally posted by: Krazysh0t

originally posted by: Thecakeisalie
a reply to: Krazysh0t

When Bangladesh is underwater people will notice.

No, they'll just invent some new excuse to ridicule and deny the people pointing out the problem.

Excuses can't compete with personal experiences and data. I have lived in the same region for a decade and at one time you could set your watch to an afternoon storm. A decade later you are lucky to get lightning. These deniers can talk the talk but yet they never put their ears to the ground and listen to the folks that have been around long enough to see the changes.

a reply to: Thecakeisalie

The east part of the US just had a record breaking snowstorm at the end of January then literally the day after it ended, the temperatures were in the 40's. Within a week and a half of those temperatures, most of the snow was gone. That's not usual.

There are more examples all around us of unusual weather patterns happening, and people just don't want to hear it despite living through them. They just want to deny and go about their days because that is what the radio told them to do.

a reply to: Krazysh0t
Krazy, just put the shovel down. You know what they say about being in a hole. The science is not settled. The zealots such as yourself wish to convince the world it is so but we're a long way from understanding all of the variables. The models they are using today can't even model current weather systems more than 3 days out with precision, and you believe these frauds can tell us what is happening over decades past and future. The contradictory data is staggering. And then there is the so called "corrected temperature data" purporting to prove AGW. You are tilting at windmills.

a reply to: bladerunner44

Thanks random internet guy #19343 for telling me the science isn't settled, but I think I'll trust ACTUAL scientists on the matter not some guy who doesn't know how science works on the internet. I mean this?

The models they are using today can't even model current weather systems more than 3 days out with precision

Lol, the models to predict weather isn't the same science as the models used to predict climate...

You are tilting at windmills.

You are denying reality.

a reply to: Krazysh0t

Too many humans in this world, then living in coastal areas, what to do with them, we humans may have come a long way, but we have not learned anything from our own mistakes, I guess that is the way of human nature.

Let them run to the hills when the water reach their backyards.

Ancient man were nomads they knew to move around in order to take advantage of their surroundings and nature.

a reply to: marg6043

Well we have technology now. We can utilize our heads and tech to build solutions. Look at my link in the OP about various places around the world that are adapting to this situation. Holland has started building communities on the water.

a reply to: Krazysh0t

Yes we have technology now, yes humans have come a long way, but the greed of those behind the technology rather wait until people are drowning so they can make the most money.

Perhaps is countries out there that are keeping their citizens wellbeing in mind, but here in the US is a lot of talk and not a darn thing done, you know why, because is all about waiting when is too late so more money can be made on the solutions that probably are already filed and waiting.

Greed is the downfall of modern man.

a reply to: marg6043

I have no disagreement there. I agree with everything you said.

Greed is the reason we are still having a conversation about the validity of Global Warming versus actually having a real discussion about fixing it.

a reply to: Krazysh0t

You nailed with that last statement, all talk, but nothing done to prevent people from dying, in a future, because is always a scapegoat to blame for it.

Then people are like cattle waiting on the government to save them.

All this brings memories of Katrina in New Orleans, all the pictures, people dying waiting for the government to come to the rescue.

a reply to: marg6043

Katrina should have been a wake up call for America, but instead we went right back to business as usual after it was all over.

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: marg6043

but instead we went right back to business as usual after it was all over.

I have to say no more, you know exactly what we are talking about

originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: Krazysh0t

www.realclimate.org...

or is my source bad?

Not really sure what the problem is: Your chart only shows the data across one full century, the 20th, where the rise in sea level from 1900-2000 is about 150 mm, or just under 6 inches. The OP's shows the rise in the 20th century at just under 6 inches.

The rub here lies in the fact that, compared to other centuries (of which your chart contains no info except the tail end of the 19th), the total deviation is much more dramatic.

What are you even trying to argue - that things get a lot more "steady" when you go from a bar graph to line chart lol?

I'm right outside Charleston, SC., and luckily bought land that is at a higher elevation than the city proper. The climate is changing- regardless of whether man-made or Mother Earth's natural biorhythm. The downtown area floods whenever there is a really high tide. The salt marshes are being washed away, so we're losing what little protection from hurricanes that we had. There are records from when this city was just a little settlement called Charles Towne that show how the sea level has inched up. We've just had a "1000 Year Flood." Our ground is so saturated there is no where for rainwater to go - wish we could send it to California!

So the name-calling, gloating and general ugliness - just give it a rest. We need to figure out what we're all going to do to, because "Climate Change" affects us all.