It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Gazrok
HIS camera, yes... Hand him a normal (unprepared camera) one and then what do you get?
The strangest thing is that when he appeared in the show about two weeks ago, alot of things happend to people at home. People started to cry or suddenly a picture of a dead family member fell on the floor. The show revieved an enormous amount of calls and emails after the show, that they decided to invite him last sunday again. This is really freaking!
And all this is according to who? His publicist perhaps? Always look for the man behind the curtain...
Originally posted by sdrumrunner
Originally posted by Gazrok
HIS camera, yes... Hand him a normal (unprepared camera) one and then what do you get?
From (early in) the article:
"The ETI appear on every camera Robbert uses. The skeptical TV crew of the dutch commercial TV network RTL4 gave Robbert a throw-away camera and were totally flabbergasted to find out that the ETI also appeared on this cam! The producer of the TV program still has the pictures in her cam."
Hmmmph. Sure would be nice to see a skeptic actually read all the way down to the second paragraph once in a while.
Originally posted by mythatsabigprobe
Originally posted by sdrumrunner
Originally posted by Gazrok
HIS camera, yes... Hand him a normal (unprepared camera) one and then what do you get?
From (early in) the article:
"The ETI appear on every camera Robbert uses. The skeptical TV crew of the dutch commercial TV network RTL4 gave Robbert a throw-away camera and were totally flabbergasted to find out that the ETI also appeared on this cam! The producer of the TV program still has the pictures in her cam."
Hmmmph. Sure would be nice to see a skeptic actually read all the way down to the second paragraph once in a while.
Ummm.... How exactly can the TV crew be totally flabbergasted about the pictures if they're still in the camera??? This is just some publicity stunt to get viewers for the Dutch version of "Montel".
Originally posted by Gazrok
...There's only one explanation for this kind of event people.....hoax, hoax, hoax, and such individuals are usually found out as such sooner or later...
Originally posted by SaranGani
wow you guys, i'm newb here and i looked at those pics and burst out laughing. They look so fake , i can't believe people actually fall for pics like that. As for the show it can always be staged like how David blane does it.
Originally posted by minniescar
Lets just put this into a rational perspective... Cameras work much like the human eye , light hits an object and it is bounced back to the lens where the image then hits the film. Film then basically gets burnt from the light bouncing onto it so the outline/image of whatever the camera is pointed at is burnt into the film. So in order for something to be photographed it must be present and within the visual spectrum of the human eye ( unless special cameras are used )
So this would mean if take a photo and see something in it after its developed that you didnt see before that 1 of 2 things has happened, either 1. you just didnt see the object at the time smoke is a real good example of this ( trust me im a smoker who has fudged up many of shots ) or 2. the camera has had some sort of malfunction such as double exposure, scratched lens, bad film, bad film processing, etc.
In this case we can eliminate option 2 becuase the odds of it happening reapeatedly with the different cameras to the same person are slim and none.
So this leaves us with option 1 that the images where present at the time the photos where taken. Please take note that the images in the photos are always blurry... this happens when the light reflecting off of an object back to the camera is to close to the lens causing it to be out of focus. You will notice the background images are in focus for the most part.