It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
We should not be fully out and we should not be half out. We should be fully in.
but if we go fully in to EU thats when being British ends surely.
quitting EU would not be British
originally posted by: RP2SticksOfDynamite
Worse still they’re being funded by big American investment banks like Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan and Morgan Stanley.
Remind me why it’s any of Goldman Sachs’ business how Britain votes in the referendum?!
With 42 days to go until the vote, it’s time we got to work. We can win this - despite all the money the other side has spent the polls are neck-and-neck. British voters just aren’t buying their argument that the only option is to stay in a failing EU.
Or its majority of people! (in mind)
originally posted by: eletheia
originally posted by: RP2SticksOfDynamite
Worse still they’re being funded by big American investment banks like Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan and Morgan Stanley.
Remind me why it’s any of Goldman Sachs’ business how Britain votes in the referendum?!
Because it is in their best interests for the UK to remain in the EU?
AND
Because it is in the best interest of the EU IF the UK remains in?
Seems no one else has the best interests of the UK in mind.
With 42 days to go until the vote, it’s time we got to work. We can win this - despite all the money the other side has spent the polls are neck-and-neck. British voters just aren’t buying their argument that the only option is to stay in a failing EU.
It doesn't appear David Cameron did himself or the *IN* cause any favours with
his speech of "being safer in the EU and preventing a future world war 3."
At least three people I know, who were on the fence have decided to vote *OUT*
THAT'S BECAUSE IT REALLY WOULD BE. IF THERE IS NO QUALIFYING STATEMENT THEN THE OPPOSITE OF WHAT HE SAID IS THE TRUTH
originally posted by: bigyin
Gordon Brown saysTHERE YOU HAVE IT! EU LAW, EU ARMY AND EU CONTROL.
We should not be fully out and we should not be half out. We should be fully in.
What does he mean by fully in ? FULLY COMMITTED TO THE EU VISION AND ITS PLANS
Should we join the Euro, give up the concessions won by Cameron, and drive on the right ? IF UK REMAIN IN EU THEY WILL LATER BE PRESSED INTO TAKING ON THE EURO
Your only fully in if you do all these things. Or does he mean fully in but only so far. FULLY SO FAR IS NOT FULLY IN, ITS FULLY SO FAR!
He also saysbut if we go fully in to EU thats when being British ends surely.
quitting EU would not be British
originally posted by: RP2SticksOfDynamite
See latest from Pollstation. Leave vote has now increased to 81% after 33500 votes.
www.pollstation.uk...
Yes I know but if you account for 21% s margin of error, Leave is still 60% after 35300 votes.
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: RP2SticksOfDynamite
See latest from Pollstation. Leave vote has now increased to 81% after 33500 votes.
www.pollstation.uk...
You can't trust internet polls. There is not even a registration for this one and you can vote more than once.
The Economist poll tracker has it as 41 Leave 40 Stay and 19 Undecided.
There you have it! What powers the EU has that it can fine nation states that have recently been through nia bankruptcy. This is ridiculous!
originally posted by: UKTruth
Meanwhile it looks as if the masters in Brussels have decided that Spain and Portugal need to be fined for not reducing their debt according to the EU's requirements. It's like a banks relationship with a debtor! Do we really want Brussels (actually a few unelected people) extorting more money from the UK with fines?
Excellent. Oscar, Brit award etc
originally posted by: 83Liberty
Has anyone heard of Brexit the Movie?
They rolled out the red carpet for celebrities and politicans last night at the Premier showing, but you can watch it online now for free...
www.youtube.com...
One would hope that the statements of these (its my job on the line) EUer's will be as transparent as they certainly appear. I mean when some one uses terms like "may" or "could" or "very to very bad" when they are using a mere crystal ball to back their statements it is obvious that there is little substance to their points.
originally posted by: eletheia
Now we have Mark Carney, who began his career with Goldman Sachs, and is a
Canadian and the only B of E Governor ever who was not British giving his views.
Mark Carney has given his starkest warning yet ....
*may cause?*
*could possibly cause?*
Very carefully crafted words and hardly definitive, and only indicating a
possibility? would we ALL could forcast the future!! LOL!!
Interesting though ... all these financial experts coming out of the wood work now!!
Where were they in 2008? When the ACTUAL financial crisis hit the worlds
economy ... the silence from them then was deafening.
TODAY another one of them ... Christine Lagarde of the IMF came out with dire
warnings *Brexit bad to very, very bad*
To quote another well known Lady/woman "Well she would wouldn't she"
originally posted by: eletheia
TODAY another one of them ... Christine Lagarde of the IMF came out with dire
warnings *Brexit bad to very, very bad*