It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: InTheLight
a reply to: TrueBrit
My point is that the OP has detracted from the real issue here by focusing on the insignificant while not even mentioning the underlying important issue, I see this as a further detraction which confuses me because this was the OPs entire premise for this thread, not to bash extreme feminists. It is confusing when a self-professed feminist does not make the real issues front and centre but chooses to treat the extreme rantings of a minority as being more important.
originally posted by: IvyNeptune
a reply to: OccamsRazor04
I feel like for a job like that everyone should have to meet the requirements whether they are female or male.
Im sure a male who cant lift that amount wouldn't be accepted. it seems biased.
Obviously I understand "special treatment" in certain areas, such as maternity leave. things of that nature.
but a physical requirement like lifting a certain amount seems very important to a job like that. its not a job we should be messing around with just for the sake of being politically correct.
originally posted by: InTheLight
originally posted by: IvyNeptune
originally posted by: InTheLight
a reply to: IvyNeptune
In researching this tampon issue, it appears there are worldwide protests regarding removing the taxing of this and other sanitary menstral items. For instance incontinence products are not taxed but menstral products are. So, I am not sure why you are focussing on one extreme feminist's comment and ignoring the main driving force behind this protest. Women's health issues and basic necessities (which should not be taxed) are still left in the dust.
www.bbc.com...
It wasnt just one comment that I was referencing. A lot of females in this 3rd wave movement of feminism were speaking of self rape. My whole point what that by this kind of nonsense it took away from the actual meaning. Like you said.. tax on tampons. So you only really proved my point that being extremist on issues take away from the real cause and real issues.
What is a lot? Whereas there is a worldwide protest to end taxation of a feminine hygiene product, which is a much more worthy topic for discussion than a radical feminist bashing thread, which in my opinion takes away from the important issues.
I could flood the rant forum with extreme men's rights groups who bash women threads, but I don't because they are a minority and their frustration and hatred is misguided - so what's the point of giving it any focus, it's a lost cause, just as with radical feminism.
originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: InTheLight
Well I think that the member was right to post her feelings the way she has. As I mentioned before in this thread, the tendency is for people to believe that every member of a particular demography (other than their own of course) is singing from the same hymn sheet. Therefore, a gentle reminder that the extremist angle taken by some feminists is not representative of the whole mass of feminists, is a reasonable point to make, not to mention an important one.
originally posted by: InTheLight
My point is that the OP has detracted from the real issue here by focusing on the insignificant while not even mentioning the underlying important issue, I see this as a further detraction which confuses me because this was the OPs entire premise for this thread, not to bash extreme feminists. It is confusing when a self-professed feminist does not make the real issues front and centre but chooses to treat the extreme rantings of a minority as being more important.
originally posted by: InTheLight
These extreme feminists do not slow down progress and you give them too much power. This is where you err, also in not researching the reasons why these particular women were acting as they did. It is a very confusing thread where you claim your main premise is that extremism detracts from women's issues, yet you do not present the issues. However, rant on as you will, I made my point, repeatedly.
originally posted by: InTheLight
a reply to: TrueBrit
That's my point, progress is being made in spite of them, so that is where the focus should be. I just chimed in here to post the underlying root protest going on, which the OP failed to do, as I considered it more important.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: Nyiah
No more so than complaining about the tax on douche products.
There is a tax on men?
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: Nyiah
Frankly, as a man (a tough, sandwich-eating one at that) I am for as little taxes as possible.