It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: butcherguy
originally posted by: queenofswords
originally posted by: butcherguy
originally posted by: Abysha
originally posted by: DrakeINFERNO
a reply to: UnBreakable
For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.
So she should stop paying her taxes?
I don't think cops should have to police private venues for commercial events.
They do it as an extra job and get paid really good money for doing it. On duty police are not required to do it.
Is the city reimbursed for their costs if they provide security for a celebrity? If so, then the taxpayer is out zero dollars.
If they do not provide security, it costs the taxpayer zero dollars.
I don't think tax dollars should pay for security because someone is a celebrity. High ranking govt officials, yes, singers... no.
originally posted by: theantediluvian
Wow, the LITERAL PC POLICE.
Funny how some of you are always blabbering incessantly about the First Amendment when it comes to denouncing the evils of "political correctness" or when something happens like a police commissioner is caught dropping racial epithets about the President in a restaurant but let a black entertainer express an opinion through her art that conflicts with your politics and you're all "reap what you sow."
originally posted by: amicktd
originally posted by: butcherguy
originally posted by: queenofswords
originally posted by: butcherguy
originally posted by: Abysha
originally posted by: DrakeINFERNO
a reply to: UnBreakable
For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.
So she should stop paying her taxes?
I don't think cops should have to police private venues for commercial events.
They do it as an extra job and get paid really good money for doing it. On duty police are not required to do it.
Is the city reimbursed for their costs if they provide security for a celebrity? If so, then the taxpayer is out zero dollars.
If they do not provide security, it costs the taxpayer zero dollars.
I don't think tax dollars should pay for security because someone is a celebrity. High ranking govt officials, yes, singers... no.
I'm almost positive their security whether off-duty police or not aren't paid with taxpayer money. The venue would pay the off-duty cops or private security.
originally posted by: butcherguy
originally posted by: Subnatural
originally posted by: butcherguy
originally posted by: Abysha
originally posted by: DrakeINFERNO
a reply to: UnBreakable
For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.
So she should stop paying her taxes?
I don't think cops should have to police private venues for commercial events.
I'm actually surprised they do that in America. You guys privatize a lot more than us Europeans, but in my country private security companies are hired to keep order at shows and festivals and the like. Of course if it's a big event the cops may have a liaison there to keep an eye on things.
I could understand the cops keeping an eye open outside the venue during such an event, in case some riot should erupt and then they could call in the troops, so to speak.
originally posted by: theantediluvian
Wow, the LITERAL PC POLICE.
Funny how some of you are always blabbering incessantly about the First Amendment when it comes to denouncing the evils of "political correctness" or when something happens like a police commissioner is caught dropping racial epithets about the President in a restaurant but let a black entertainer express an opinion through her art that conflicts with your politics and you're all "reap what you sow."
TBO.com staff
Published: February 19, 2016
Updated: February 19, 2016 at 11:45 AM
The police union boss in Tampa may not be a big Beyonce fan these days, but local law agencies on Friday insist plenty of officers and deputies will be working off-duty security for her April 29 in Tampa.
There’s no boycott, contrary to some recent media reports — based on “inaccuracies,” Tampa police said — after Tampa Police Benevolent Association president Vinny Gercitano, in a Facebook post, expressed disgust with the “anti-police message” in Beyonce’s recent Super Bowl performance and new “Formation” video.
Gercitano urged officers to not purchase Beyonce’s music or tickets to her concerts, and supported any member who choose not to work the extra duty at the April 29 show. However, he never called for a security boycott of the show at Raymond James Stadium.
Nevertheless, the Tampa Police Department has responded to the criticism on social media, trying to clear up any controversy.
What?! @TampaPD officers have been in #formation for days signing up to keep the #Beehive safe! #Truth #Fact pic.twitter.com/5skrSDNHNS
— TampaPD (@TampaPD) February 18, 2016
“ The bottom line — the event will be staffed with police officers. It is unfortunate that this has been taken to the level that it has,” the department wrote on Facebook.
“There are people signed up to work the event, and it isn’t uncommon for events not to be filled two months prior to the actual date,” the agency wrote. “In addition, individual police officers do have a right to an opinion just like the rest of the world, and they also have the right not to volunteer to work for an event on their off time.”
Hillsborough County Sheriff’s Office spokeswoman Cristal Nunez concurred, saying among deputies there was no boycott “that we know of, but we’re still two months out from the concert date.”
Tampa’s Jane Castor to monitor Miami police as part of federal settlement
TAMPA — Retired Tampa Police Chief Jane Castor has been chosen to monitor a four-year program overseeing the Miami Police Department as part of a proposed settlement with the U.S. Department of Justice.
The settlement was struck in 2011 following a federal investigation into 33 police shootings, according to a story in the Miami Herald.
Miami police union prez: Cops won’t work off-duty at Beyoncé show
Miami’s police union members have voted to boycott Beyoncé’s concert at Marlins Park in April because of her Super Bowl performance and the release of a video that pays homage to the Black Panthers.
In a letter urging other police agencies across the country to take a similar stance, Fraternal Order of Police President Javier Ortiz accused the pop icon used this year’s Super Bowl “to divide Americans by promoting the Black Panthers and her anti-police message shows how she does not support law enforcement.”
In response, Ella Moore, president of the Miami Community Police Benevolent Association, wrote a scathing open letter to the city in regards to Ortiz.
The MCPBA response to FOP President @wsvn @WPLGLocal10 @CBS4Weather @nbc6 @NationalBPA @MiamiNewTimes @MiamiHerald pic.twitter.com/MKFHKIiFV6
— MCPBA1946 (@mcpba1946) February 19, 2016
“I implore the City’s leadership to do whatever is necessary to put a stop to Mr. Ortiz’s antics,” she wrote. “Javier Ortiz can no longer be allowed free and unfettered license to destroy the reputation of one of the finest law enforcement agencies in the nation. This is another embarrassment to the City of Miami.”
originally posted by: UnBreakable
"Tampa police refusing to work sold out Beyoncé stadium show"
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: UnBreakable
"Tampa police refusing to work sold out Beyoncé stadium show"
I've been over her for a long time, so I haven't really followed this.
But, how is it OK to have a protest show at the Super Bowl?
"What about the children" couldn't resist.
I think it is more about personal safety when she gets the crowd excited and all those targets in blue are standing there.
She can afford private security as she is hosing her fans out of many bucks to see her jiggle about in person.
If she does incite violence with her lyrics, will she be held responsible?
During a news conference about the incident Tuesday, Arnold floated the possibility that Beyoncé's politically charged performances of late may have instigated the shooter in a time when police shootings across the country are closely watched.
"With everything that's happened since the Super Bowl, and with law enforcement as a whole. I think we've lost five to seven officers, five deputies, sheriffs since the Super Bowl," Arnold told reporters. "Here's another target on law enforcement."
I guess this is a case where your reap what you sow. She performed her anti-cop show at the SB, now there not signing up right away to do her show.
“The fact that Beyoncé used this year’s Super Bowl to divide Americans by promoting the Black Panthers and her antipolice message shows how she does not support law enforcement,” Javier Ortiz, president of the Miami Fraternal Order of Police, said in a statement issued Thursday.
originally posted by: queenofswordsThat is exactly what it was: a protest disguised as art. Some of us saw right through it, didn't we?
originally posted by: Abysha
So she should stop paying her taxes?
originally posted by: jhn7537
a reply to: UnBreakable
Good... You talk sh*t about LEO's and then you expect them to keep you safe at your concert? Nope... Beyonce, Kanye, Kardashians, and Martin Shkreli all need to fly somewhere together.. I'm convinced God will handle the rest...
originally posted by: jhn7537
a reply to: UnBreakable
Good... You talk sh*t about LEO's and then you expect them to keep you safe at your concert? Nope... Beyonce, Kanye, Kardashians, and Martin Shkreli all need to fly somewhere together.. I'm convinced God will handle the rest...