It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Okay...the Betty / Barney Hill case, and the flood of misinformation that has ensued...specifically the map...
Discussions of alien moon bases and videos of structures on the dark side of the moon aren’t new. That congress is investigating, not only the bases themselves but three decades or more of continually doctored data from NASA and defense space projects is news.
" According to many researchers of Lunar and Martian space agency images, photos revealing artifacts and structures are routinely modified by NASA higher-ups.
In NASA Trick To Remove Alien Evidence From Moon, Mars Revealed insiders Ken Johnston and Donna Hare accuse the space agency of “ordering a cover-up of photographic evidence,” and that “NASA doctored, obfuscated, and obscured thousands of photos over the years.”
Part of the process involves a neutral filter allowing moving objects to be removed. Some photographic experts, however, argue that the same software can be tweaked to filter out objects anomalous to a landscape.
Future space images—or even some of the most damning from the past—could be subjected to the process. The result would be images bereft of any embarrassing or controversial objects that may be littering the Lunar or Martian landscapes.
And then there’s the publication, The Canadian that reports: “Dr. Micheal Salla has indicated that there is a Military Industrial Extraterrestrial Complex or MIEC, and that Earth is being assimilated by an alien agenda which also operates on Earth’s Moon.”...........
originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: tanka418
Okay...the Betty / Barney Hill case, and the flood of misinformation that has ensued...specifically the map...
Published in a best-selling book. How is that a government secret? As for the map:
www.armaghplanet.com...
(More in the thread I am working on. It will critique the case from several angles, including the four major and conflicting interpretations of the "map.")
originally posted by: tanka418
It appears that "the government" knows vastly more than we do, and vastly less that we can imagine...which makes us next to ignorant, but, apparently we actually try to make some sense from all the . . . stuff...
originally posted by: Blue Shift
originally posted by: tanka418
It appears that "the government" knows vastly more than we do, and vastly less that we can imagine...which makes us next to ignorant, but, apparently we actually try to make some sense from all the . . . stuff...
How can you know what you don't know?
The article at your link contains blatantly false information!
But I suppose I should save that for your thread...
originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: tanka418
If data from ESA does not support your beliefs, it must be "blatantly false?"
In 1968, Marjorie Fish of Oak Harbor, Ohio read Fuller's Interrupted Journey. She was an elementary school teacher and amateur astronomer. Intrigued by the "star map", Fish wondered if it might be "deciphered" to determine which star system the UFO came from. Assuming that one of the fifteen stars on the map must represent the Earth's Sun, Fish constructed a three-dimensional model of nearby Sun-like stars using thread and beads, basing stellar distances on those published in the 1969 Gliese Star Catalogue. Studying thousands of vantage points over several years, the only one that seemed to match the Hill map was from the viewpoint of the double star system of Zeta Reticuli.
Distance information needed to match three stars, forming the distinctive triangle Hill said she remembered, was not generally available until the 1969 Gliese Catalogue came out.
Fish sent her analysis to Webb. Agreeing with her conclusions, Webb sent the map to Terence Dickinson, editor of the popular magazine Astronomy. Dickinson did not endorse Fish and Webb's conclusions, but for the first time in the journal's history, Astronomy invited comments and debate on a UFO report, starting with an opening article in the December 1974 issue. For about a year afterward, the opinions page of Astronomy carried arguments for and against Fish's star map. Notable was an argument made by Carl Sagan and Steven Soter,[29] arguing that the seeming "star map" was little more than a random alignment of chance points. In contrast, those more favorable to the map, such as David Saunders, a statistician who had been on the Condon UFO study, argued that unusual alignment of key Sun-like stars in a plane centered around Zeta Reticuli (first described by Fish) was statistically improbable to have happened by chance from a random group of stars in our immediate neighborhood.[30][31]
Skeptic Robert Sheaffer, in an accompanying article said that a map devised by Charles W. Atterberg, about the same time as Fish, was an even better match to Hill's map and made more sense. The base stars, Epsilon Indi and Epsilon Eridani, plus the others were also closer to the Sun than the Hill map. Fish counterargued that the base stars in the Atterberg map were considered much less likely to harbor life than Zeta Reticuli and the map lacked a consistent grouping of Sun-like stars along the lined routes.[citation needed]
In 1993, two German crop circle enthusiasts, Joachim Koch and Hans-Jürgen Kyborg, suggested that the map depicted planets in the Solar System, not nearby stars. The objects in the map, they said, closely match the positions of the Sun, the six inner planets and several asteroids around the time of the incident.[32] This would parallel other abduction accounts where witnesses claim to be shown such depictions, though admittedly often elaborate and unmistakably the Solar System.[citation needed]
originally posted by: ClownFish
This has probably already been said or thought, but my 4 cents:
1. The government is trying to maintain the credibility that they never had.
3. I'm wondering about this amnesia business that should perhaps have more scrutiny. The assumption is that it is associated with the alien experience and imposed by same, but what if it is self imposed via some interior mechanism to protect ourselves, sort of like how adrenaline overrides pain in a crisis. Perhaps there are similar aspects within our own make-up to deal with the "un-deal-able" and/or a type of mass amnesia, sort of like group hysteria, but under a different fashion. To outsiders, this could easily be mistaken for "failure to disclose."
-- Source
Orexin, also called hypocretin, is a neuropeptide that regulates arousal, wakefulness, and appetite.[
It seems quite reasonable that ET may be using some sort of airborne chemical to block Orexin receptors in abduction victims.
originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: tanka418
It seems quite reasonable that ET may be using some sort of airborne chemical to block Orexin receptors in abduction victims.
Why would beings who can pass through walls need drugs? Doesn't it seem more probable that the government is using these drugs to simulate alien abductions?
Funny you should bring up "government"...