It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: MystikMushroom
a reply to: Krazysh0t
He's not really an actor
originally posted by: UnBreakable
originally posted by: MystikMushroom
a reply to: Krazysh0t
He's not really an actor
And people thought Reagan would make a good president just based on his acting skills? Ever see 'Bedtime for Bonzo'? Not trying to compare Trump to Reagan here, just trying to make a point.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: LSU0408
a reply to: Krazysh0t
He said muslims because they're the majority and when you think of the Middle East, you think of muslims. He's clearly talking about foreigners. But stink it up however you need to.
No, he was talking about Muslims. I don't need YOU to clarify Trump's words for me. I heard Muslims, not foreigners and you trying to make his words more politically correct isn't going to hide the fact that he wanted to break the 1st Amendment.
originally posted by: LSU0408
originally posted by: UnBreakable
originally posted by: MystikMushroom
a reply to: Krazysh0t
He's not really an actor
And people thought Reagan would make a good president just based on his acting skills? Ever see 'Bedtime for Bonzo'? Not trying to compare Trump to Reagan here, just trying to make a point.
Good luck my friend. The haters seem to think of reality tv when it comes to Trump.
originally posted by: LSU0408
a reply to: Sargeras
What part of my post set off the "he called me lazy" alert in your head? I guess you don't live in America, otherwise, you would be too hard at work to have time to post a response since it's 3:25 pm CST.
originally posted by: UKTruth
Seriously OP , you post so much negativity about Trump. Some of it is true but some of it is just pure regurgitation of establishment media BS. You seem to want to spin anything Trump into a negative.
I just can't take your views on him seriously because you are never objective. As far as Trump is concerned you just come across as a shill.
originally posted by: UKTruth
Seriously OP , you post so much negativity about Trump. Some of it is true but some of it is just pure regurgitation of establishment media BS. You seem to want to spin anything Trump into a negative.
I just can't take your views on him seriously because you are never objective. As far as Trump is concerned you just come across as a shill.
originally posted by: Benevolent Heretic
a reply to: LSU0408
From Breitbart source:
Sources close to the process who work for the RNC, but are not authorized to speak on the record, confirmed to Breitbart News throughout the evening on Saturday that that is standard operating procedure for the RNC and the party as a whole for all debates: Donors get tickets while voters have to watch on TV at home.
Source
If Donald wants to play in the Big Leagues, he needs to follow the same rules as everyone else. Contrary to his belief, he is not a special snowflake.
originally posted by: UKTruth
Seriously OP , you post so much negativity about Trump. Some of it is true but some of it is just pure regurgitation of establishment media BS. You seem to want to spin anything Trump into a negative.
I just can't take your views on him seriously because you are never objective. As far as Trump is concerned you just come across as a shill.
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: Benevolent Heretic
a reply to: LSU0408
From Breitbart source:
Sources close to the process who work for the RNC, but are not authorized to speak on the record, confirmed to Breitbart News throughout the evening on Saturday that that is standard operating procedure for the RNC and the party as a whole for all debates: Donors get tickets while voters have to watch on TV at home.
Source
If Donald wants to play in the Big Leagues, he needs to follow the same rules as everyone else. Contrary to his belief, he is not a special snowflake.
Rules can be challenged. If Trump did not call out that the audience represents the minority view then people at home might think that the boos were representative of the public and it might sway their vote. To that end, Trump is doing the right thing shining a light on it. In fact, he is shining a light on all the political dirty tricks and its great to see. If the special snowflake RNC can't handle it, tough luck. If they are going to try and stack the process in favour of who they want to win then they will have to accept being exposed.
Its well past time to stop all this BS and actually elect the person the people want to lead them.
originally posted by: LSU0408
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: Benevolent Heretic
a reply to: LSU0408
From Breitbart source:
Sources close to the process who work for the RNC, but are not authorized to speak on the record, confirmed to Breitbart News throughout the evening on Saturday that that is standard operating procedure for the RNC and the party as a whole for all debates: Donors get tickets while voters have to watch on TV at home.
Source
If Donald wants to play in the Big Leagues, he needs to follow the same rules as everyone else. Contrary to his belief, he is not a special snowflake.
Rules can be challenged. If Trump did not call out that the audience represents the minority view then people at home might think that the boos were representative of the public and it might sway their vote. To that end, Trump is doing the right thing shining a light on it. In fact, he is shining a light on all the political dirty tricks and its great to see. If the special snowflake RNC can't handle it, tough luck. If they are going to try and stack the process in favour of who they want to win then they will have to accept being exposed.
Its well past time to stop all this BS and actually elect the person the people want to lead them.
I can't express how hard it is to bash my own party, but what they're doing to our front runner is absolutely disgusting.
originally posted by: olaru12
a reply to: Krazysh0t
What third party would Trump run under....T party? Would they accept him? The Libertarian party has already gone with Gov. G Johnson
I think it's a bit late to establish a new party.
The terms "populism" and "populist" have been used in the 20th and 21st centuries to describe anti-elitist appeals against established interests or mainstream parties, referring to both the political left and right.
originally posted by: interupt42
a reply to: Krazysh0t
but Paul didn't have nearly as much actual support as we like to think he did.
That was because the GOP and foxnews had a constant feed saying Ron Paul was crazy and a radical. Despite him being against the war and foreseeing just about everything that is occurring today.
Plus the internet was not as big a force in politics as it is today.
Comparing either the Trump or the Sanders campaign to the Paul campaign does injustice to those two campaigns
Regardless whether you believe in Ron Pauls policies or not, his campaign opened the door For Bernie and Trump. He opened the eyes of many people to realize that the DNC and GOP are an establishment tool.
He even had a Liberal Media source like John Stewart demonstrate the corruption and agenda, who (including bern fan) likely got their first look at the blatant agenda in politics.
Ron Paul also opened the internet as a force to be reckoned with in politics that both Trump and Bernie are using.
So I don't think 'injustice' would be the term I would use.