It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Protoscience - en.wikipedia.org...
In the philosophy of science, a protoscience is any new area of scientific endeavor in the process of becoming established. Protoscience is a term sometimes used to describe a hypothesis which has not yet been tested adequately by the scientific method, but which is otherwise consistent with existing science or which, where inconsistent, offers reasonable account of the inconsistency.
While protoscience is often speculative, it is to be distinguished from pseudoscience by its adherence to the scientific method and standard practices of good science, most notably a willingness to be disproven by new evidence (if and when it appears), or supplanted by a more-predictive theory.
Fields such as astrology and alchemy prior to the invention of the scientific method can also be regarded as protosciences.
Magick - en.wikipedia.org...
Magick is an alternate spelling of magic, coined by Aleister Crowley to differentiate sorcery from illusion or stage magic.
Originally posted by Off_The_Street
cug says:
"While Magick is a science, the thing that separates it from say chemistry is how the result arrives. "
No. "Magick" is not a science. If you can't measure it, if your results aren't repeatable, it's not a science.
"With chemistry if I do A, B and C always happen and I get Z With Magick if I do A, B and C might happen and I get Z, or D and F might happen happen and I get Z."
Exactly. You get random results. If I stand on my head, I might split my pants or I might find a nickel or I might get a headache or I might get some sort of mystic insights.
Or I might not.
This is called "random happenstnce".
"If it doesn’t happen well then I did something wrong (just like in chemistry"
No. If it doesn't happen, it means that it doesn't work.
"Now the modern scientist will say that the result is a coincidence and the ritual had no effect on the outcome… but is it really a coincidence if the requested outcome always happens?"
No, it wouldn't always be coincidence if the requested outcome always happens.
But it doesn't!
Originally posted by Off_The_Street
magickesists says:
"what about things that are proven not magic but have actual reasons explained by scientific studies based in true science."
What about them? It seems to me that they're not magic if they can be "proven".
They might not have known the actual atomic chemistry of energetics, but they used the scientific method -- painstaking experimentation, recording their data, modifying a single variable, etc. -- to improve the product.
"Now if the same idea is used in modern day would it not mean that some things that are magic could be explained by investigation."
That's a good point. But for some reason, none of the people who talk about magic are willing to do that kind of investigation. I do not know why that is; do you?
Excellent point. I would be willing to go further and say that a "magic spell" could well be something that triggers you (assuming you know about the "magic spell") to give you a bit more self-confidence in your dealings with the fair maiden.
"That seems pretty unmagical to me because its psychology. another form of science performed by "scientists" of the mind and its interesting quirks.Right?"
True, although a lot of hard scientists and engineers don't consider psychology a "real" science because there are too many variables to deal with.
I personally believe that much of psychology is valid.
What takes place here is the act of imprinting the intention of the ritual as a statement/image/both. The stronger the magician feels the stronger the imprint on the astral plane that precedes physical manifestation, and thus faster the desired outcome manifests on the physical plane.
My point is that I think magick is a science, the scientists only have to wait for a millenia or two before more effective research can take place.
Originally posted by Magickesists
I see alot of reasons that have been suggested as to why myself or others should believe magic is in fact truly plausible.
However i have seen or heard of no actualy cases do you have real facts to back up all these statements as what we are trying to decipher in this thread is the nature of magic and the things behind the causes. Not what you believe to be the truth as beleifs can be misleading, but actual results graphs whatever you can provide that would show actual results practices and/or the reasons that the magic actually works.
What do you people believe allows you to control energy and thought to manipulate matter or people. Im not alluding that anyone in the forum is manipulating people with magic. It's just that all the things being described, energy focusing, channeling and such are all a result of the brain and/or mind. now with that in mind do you agree that anything that manifests itself in reality do to a body part is able to be considered scientifically investigatable.
The results "manifest" themselves by natural means... so pretty much any scientific investigation will say any result arrived by natural means and discount it. Magick is NOT paranormal!
Originally posted by Magickesists
hey how long would it take to attain results from these programs and things. would they actually do the things suggested?
Oh yeah i used the email option on the academy of sorcery and got an error not htp found thingy that made me think it was a scam right away.
Originally posted by Magickesists
so all the debating and argument aside what is possible with the magic in these books anyway.