It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Cobaltic1978
Even the greatest engineer, Isambard Kingdom Brunel, couldn't assist with this one.
Man, I don't know about the rest of what you are asking, but the rigid tube dude, my goodness.
originally posted by: theantediluvian
a reply to: VoidHawk
Unfortunately, no. The force wave propagates through the tube at sub lightspeed.
originally posted by: theantediluvian
a reply to: VoidHawk
Unfortunately, no. The force wave propagates through the tube at sub lightspeed. Specifically, the speed of sound of the material.
originally posted by: Bluntone22
Your rods would not move on the other end because of the material compressing. Even diamond that long would squish over that distance.
originally posted by: schuyler
originally posted by: theantediluvian
a reply to: VoidHawk
Unfortunately, no. The force wave propagates through the tube at sub lightspeed. Specifically, the speed of sound of the material.
Plus the energy required would be immense. Nice drawing though.
originally posted by: donktheclown
a reply to: VoidHawk I think it is a pretty good theory as I thought the exact same thing years ago. The weight shouldn't be that great an issue in space. Also, you don't need a light year (6 trillion miles) worth of rod. A months worth should work fine.
originally posted by: DutchMasterChief
a reply to: VoidHawk
I was really just querying whether it would beat the light speed problem.
What light speed problem?
You mean the distance problem.