It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: anxiouswens
My own view is that rather than spending tax payers money on imprisoning them they would send out a clearer message if they in fact removed passports from anyone who it is proven to have travelled to Syria to join ISIS and refused them entry back into the Country.
originally posted by: Thecakeisalie
a reply to: crazyewok
You said 'Jihadis'. Methinks you refrained yourself from saying something else.
Jihad is not a religion-it is a perverse ideal that originated from a well established religion-just like pedophilia is linked to Catholic priests.
For one thing prison is supposed to act as a deterrent in the hope that someone leaves prison as a reformed character.
originally posted by: Sargeras
originally posted by: crazyewok
originally posted by: anxiouswens
Thats my point really. Im not saying she shouldnt be punished far from it but I dont know if a prison sentence is the best punishment. Does anyone really want these people in prison with this ideology to be let back out onto British streets at some point in the future? Does anybody really believe its going to change her mindset because I dont. I think she and people like her will pose more of a threat once they come out and then thousands of pounds are being paid to keep them there.
I am sure I recall somewhere in the back of my mind the government saying a couple of years ago that these people who chose to join ISIS wouldnt be let back into the country once they had left. Another promise not to be fulfilled! a reply to: Freeborn
But she will be danger outside of Prison among the public.
Lock her up for life or execute her. There should be no other option for the Jihads. They are not fit or safe to be around civilised folk.
They are animals mascarading as humans.
Put them in a zoo or put them down.
These are the only options.
It is too bad the Aussie's are using Australia..... Great place to dump them all off together.
Just saying
originally posted by: anxiouswens
www.express.co.uk...
For those not in the UK Tareena Shakil is a British Mother who travelled to Syria with her 14 month old baby to join ISIS. During her time in Syria she posted photos of her baby with an AK47. Eventually she became disillusioned with her time in Syria and returned to UK. Shw was found guilty last week of belonging to ISIS and was today sentenced to 6 years in prison a more in depth report is in the source above.
The purpose of my thread though is to question whether ATS members think this is the best way of dealing with these situations. Myself I am not so sure I wonder if in the long term it is creating more problems than it is solving.
For one thing prison is supposed to act as a deterrent in the hope that someone leaves prison as a reformed character. Surely by imprisoning her she is more likely to become radicalised. The ideology she follows teaches to hate everything in the West. She is now going to be separated from her child and miss at least 3 years of and her life will this then not make her hate the West all the more?
There have been many reports about radicalisation taking place in Prisons in the UK so she is also probably going to become more radicalised if she is surrounded by people with similar mindsets to her and there is also the chance of her radicalising other prisoners.
Then there is her child who is going to be scarred and damaged by being separated from his mother. Is he going to grow up angry and resentful to the West for imprisoning his mother and is he then not more likely to be radicalised himself.
There are many presently in our prison system who have been radicalised and at some point they will be released. Are the UK in actual fact just storing up many problems for the future rather than dealing with the underlying reason as to why these people became radicalised in the first place.
My own view is that rather than spending tax payers money on imprisoning them they would send out a clearer message if they in fact removed passports from anyone who it is proven to have travelled to Syria to join ISIS and refused them entry back into the Country. The only problem with this then would be the safety of the children they have took with them.
I dont really know what the answer is but I dont know whether this is it! What do other people think?
originally posted by: anxiouswens
Then there is her child who is going to be scarred and damaged by being separated from his mother.
originally posted by: Cobaltic1978
She will probably be put on a de-radicalisation programme in prison, reverse brain washing if you like.
Six years in prison is extreme in itself, but I guess the Government has to start making examples of these would be Jihadists and Jihadi Brides, in order to put people off from travelling to Syria and the likes.