Utility fog - if it's real then the search for proof is over, right?

a reply to: DJW001

Way to be open minded and research it thoroughly. Tell me what was the scientific scale of crappy acting that you used? I'd like it for when I watch netflix.

a reply to: DJW001

Do you consider George Knapp a serious ufologist? He's taking it VERY seriously

originally posted by: rangenoe0
a reply to: DJW001

Way to be open minded and research it thoroughly. Tell me what was the scientific scale of crappy acting that you used? I'd like it for when I watch netflix.

Let's see... this guy believes he has a technology a thousand years in advance of ours in a little bottle, and he seems about as excited about it as a man who was given a coupon for 50 cents off shoe polish. Where is the awe? Where is the suspicion? Hasn't he heard that the government assassinates people like him? Do you really think you can take something like that into a NASA laboratory and walk back out with it? Why is the liquid clear? Aluminum is a metal, it should be a dull, reflective grey. How did he manage to collect that sample? Was it just lying on the ground as a puddle? Why did he think that puddle was something special? Do I need to go on, or are you going to buy the DVD because you want to believe?

originally posted by: TanhauserGate
a reply to: DJW001

Do you consider George Knapp a serious ufologist? He's taking it VERY seriously

Absolutely I do not consider him a serious ufologist. In fact, his interest is further evidence that it's a[HOAX!] If this were for real, it would be written up in scientific journals and DARPA would be trying to duplicate it.

a reply to: DJW001

ok I see what you mean. and yeah your right this wouldn't have seen the light if real.

Thank you. Here is a quick look at Cooper's CV:

www.imdb.com...

www.apolloresourcecorporation.com...

www.coopercoretechnologies.com...

seldonwater.com...

Lots of vague mission statements and inconsistent career history. He's a con man bilking investors on Kickstarter by using the "nanotech" buzz word.

a reply to: DJW001

haha yeah. Too many "new" discoveries for one man

originally posted by: TanhauserGate
a reply to: DJW001

ok I see what you mean. and yeah your right this wouldn't have seen the light if real.

That's a curious concept people use to believe in something by thinking if such a thing existed then we wouldn't be allowed to see it, so therefore as there is nothing for us to see then it must exist and be hidden....

Creates a circular argument a little doesn't it?

a reply to: TanhauserGate

usually, but I have heard him give voice to some stuff pretty far down the ludicrous scale. This is a nice topic, because it's a completely feasible and probable eventual technology - in this case it just seems like an attempt at attention/money/whatever without any actual substance.

a reply to: uncommitted

Creates a circular argument a little doesn't it?

Only on its own. It is the result of a series of questions that show how unlikely the claim actually is based on its own internal inconsistencies. This thread should probably be moved to [HOAX!].

a reply to: uncommitted

I get your point as well but considering we're still rocking the internal combustion engine it just seems as a species we're not making any huge leaps in innovation

a reply to: TanhauserGate


Is it real is in not who the FUG knows



Anymore more questions?

originally posted by: Layaly
a reply to: TanhauserGate


Is it real is in not who the FUG knows



Anymore more questions?

yes one more question, what the hell are you talking about?

Hi guys

Transcribed the whole interview with Chris Cooper, checked his background extensively and put it on another forum.
Quick search will find it.
Think this could be one of the stories of the year. The guy is right on the edge of the black world looking in. Seems absolutely legitimate and is telling us the most incredible things

Longeyes

a reply to: TanhauserGate

Come on man, microscopic nano machines that he found in a crop circle?
Sure he wouldnt be able to see them never mind pick them up

A bit of critical thinking will show you the way...

a reply to: Impodog

Well how about enlightening us and post your findings here?

Sorry dude i only have so much time and energy.
Feel free to cut and paste my transcription and research here though

a reply to: Impodog

Thank you!

a reply to: SecretKnowledge

Agreed, however his background does check out?

originally posted by: TanhauserGate
a reply to: DJW001

Do you consider George Knapp a serious ufologist? He's taking it VERY seriously

George Knapp is about as serious, and as dedicated that a researcher can get in this field. Everything about UFO's is dubious to a certain extent because we have no evidence of anything, so if he has interest in it, there is probably something important we do not know.

George is an ATS member, so let's just ask him. Hey George, what's up with this? Please fill in the gaps if you can.
Thanks.