It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Republicans are determined to push on with their investigation of Planned Parenthood, even after a Texas grand jury cleared the organization of wrongdoing on Monday and instead indicted two anti-abortion activists who targeted the family planning provider in a series of undercover videos.
Planned Parenthood has maintained that it was not selling fetal tissue, which would have been illegal, and commissioned a study that demonstrated the videos were manipulated. The organization sued the Center for Medical Progress, the anti-abortion group behind the videos, earlier this month.
The grand jury’s decision hasn’t affected Republicans' plans to continue investigating Planned Parenthood, however. Rep. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.), who is chairing a select investigative committee that purports to be investigating “big abortion providers" -- but for all intents and purposes is only scrutinizing Planned Parenthood -- said in a statement Tuesday that “the mission of our investigation has not changed.”
“We will continue to gather information and get the facts about medical practices of abortion service providers and the business practices of the procurement organizations who sell baby body parts,” Blackburn said. “These are issues of importance to the American people. We will study the laws on the books and follow the facts to defend life."
originally posted by: intrptr
If they are investigating at all its biased in favor of PP, like your thread title.
originally posted by: stormbringer1701
actually the video sting did not backfire. The indictments are for using false IDs to get past the PP persona non grata activist black list. Same thing sixty minutes used to do in their investigative reporting. The indictments have nothing to do with the veracity of the reports.
furthermore the indictments came from the same DA office that jury shopped seven times in order to get the former GOP speaker of the House. It is not an honest legal process down there in that county. It will require PP to open itself to the discovery process. additionally legal experts opine that the state/PP will lose.
Essentially this is an attempt at suppression/intimidation without hope of permanent vindication for PP and their political allies.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
Which legal experts would they be?
Or rather you are inventing a narrative because you can't admit that this whole issue has been one giant witch hunt. That sounds far more likely here.
originally posted by: stormbringer1701
1. unworthy of comment.
2. Various lawyers and judges i have seen interviewed on this topic; for example, the legal team O'reilly uses for his legal segments.
3. Hardly. the videos are unedited except for brevity. the undedited raw footage is available. the PP people damn themselveswith their own words.
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: Krazysh0t
How is it in favor of PP?
The videos didn't '"back fire" they hit the mark, exposing the heads and practitioners for marketing dead baby parts. Even altering procedures like half births to procure certain parts undamaged. Thats illegal.
riiiiiiight. This is the same county that convened seven grand juries before they could find one that would indict Tom Delay. PKB much there?
originally posted by: WeRpeons
a reply to: Krazysh0t
Doesn't surprise me considering the GOP is always trying to impeach democratic presidents and launch criminal investigations. It's too bad they didn't have the same vigor to impeach and launch a criminal investigation against one of their own, George W.
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: Krazysh0t
Apparently they didn't "expose" anything, because no matter how much you claim illegality, the only ones in legal trouble are the ones who actually made the videos.
Might makes right, I know. And denial blinds the truth.
originally posted by: intrptr
You're still making excuses for PP? what for, since obviously (lol) they weren't in the wrong, caught on tape, cutting deals for 'tissue samples', over dinner?
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: Krazysh0t
How is it in favor of PP?
The videos didn't '"back fire" they hit the mark, exposing the heads and practitioners for marketing dead baby parts. Even altering procedures like half births to procure certain parts undamaged. Thats illegal.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: intrptr
You're still making excuses for PP? what for, since obviously (lol) they weren't in the wrong, caught on tape, cutting deals for 'tissue samples', over dinner?
Which excuses am I making for PP? I'm asking YOU to stop believing lies and stop supporting GOP members on an obvious witch hunt.