It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: Semicollegiate
So he sources all that?
That immigrants use more welfare in the only possible conclusion from the data.
Or the only one he and others want to conclude from it.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Semicollegiate
I can't seem to find any numbers for welfare dollars for immigrants vs natives on that site.
But I guess it means that immigration should be stopped because immigrants are more dependant upon it than natives? Or is that that welfare should be stopped? Or just welfare for immigrants?
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Semicollegiate
I can't seem to find any numbers for welfare dollars for immigrants vs natives on that site.
But I guess it means that immigration should be stopped because immigrants are more dependant upon it than natives? Or is it that welfare should be stopped? Or just welfare for immigrants?
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: BatheInTheFountain
1) The one you linked.
2) Immigration should be stopped? Ok. That would fix it, for sure. Then natives would be using all the welfare.
3) Welfare too. Ok. That would fix it, for sure.
It must be nice to live in a simple little world where correlation always = causation.
I thought reactionaries were a thing of the past. But yes, as you said, we are all immigrants.
originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: Semicollegiate
Census keeps track of who uses the most welfare in their lifetime?
So what? Immigrants are citizens. Deserving of the same rights as every US citizen.
Immigration should be stopped because the current, since 1964, composition of immigrants collect more welfare at every stage of their lives than citizens born in the USA.
What?
Immigration is so obviously detrimental to the economy that crimes against the state are in order.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Semicollegiate
So what? Immigrants are citizens. Deserving of the same rights as every US citizen.
Immigration should be stopped because the current, since 1964, composition of immigrants collect more welfare at every stage of their lives than citizens born in the USA.
What?
Immigration is so obviously detrimental to the economy that crimes against the state are in order.
4) The report referenced the video, as stated, did NOT differentiate between Illegal vs. Legal. It is about IMMIGRATION, which is a vague phrase used by Governmental agencies.
Ah. And of course, the youtuber is the arbiter of quality.
And the video is positing the QUALITY of Immigrants, where they are from, the Demogrpahics.
I looked at the report. And I actually know what reactionary means.
Did you watch the video or are you just shooting from the hip....you know...like a "Reactionary"
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: BatheInTheFountain
4) The report referenced the video, as stated, did NOT differentiate between Illegal vs. Legal. It is about IMMIGRATION, which is a vague phrase used by Governmental agencies.
Actually the report does differentiate. But I guess you didn't bother to read it.
Ah. And of course, the youtuber is the arbiter of quality.
And the video is positing the QUALITY of Immigrants, where they are from, the Demogrpahics.
I looked at the report. And I actually know what reactionary means.
Did you watch the video or are you just shooting from the hip....you know...like a "Reactionary"
I just saw where the study compared BOTH Illegal Immigrants AND Legal ones.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: BatheInTheFountain
I just saw where the study compared BOTH Illegal Immigrants AND Legal ones.
You mean you just saw the study.
Which means I just reread the SMALL Print in the intro.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: BatheInTheFountain
My argument is that the claim that immigration is bad for the country based upon the claim that immigrants use a disproportionate level of public assistance is flawed.
The youtuber is a reactionary racist who uses a biased report which cherry picks data to support his position.
Will the term "Hitler" come soon?