It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: hellobruce
originally posted by: beenharmed
then why don't you heed his warnings
Why do you believe the rantings of a nutter?
originally posted by: hellobruce
No it is not, actually!
maps.ngdc.noaa.gov...
originally posted by: AdmireTheDistance
No, it's actually moving the opposite direction, and has been since the late 1800s.
I believe the next North Pole will be in Siberia, northwest of Lake Baikal, near the borders of Russia and Mongolia. There is a large magnetic anomaly there. The famous Tunguska blast event of 1908 occurred there. The Magnetic North Pole is already moving in that direction. Founders of the pole shift theory feel this is the likely location of our next North Pole.
The following sequence of figures shows the change of the magnetic field intensity over the last 200 years [swdcwww.kugi.kyoto-u.ac.jp...], along with the North Magnetic Pole (NMP) movement map [gsc.nrcan.gc.ca...]. Around 1900 the NMP reversed direction and started accelerating north towards the Arctic. This coincides with an increase in the magnetic field intensity in northern Siberia, and the subsequent development of two north magnetic intensities. In 1800 there was a single north magnetic intensity over northern Canada; by early 1900s the Siberian intensity was growing; by 2000 the Siberian intensity was the stronger of the two. The location of the center of the Siberian magnetic flux intensity is the same location as the Tunguska event.
The following figures show the magnetic field intensity (left) and the magnetic meridians (right) in 2000 [gsc.nrcan.gc.ca...]. The magnetic field is asymmetrical – with two field maxima: one over the northwest shore of Hudson Bay in Canada, and one over the Central Siberian Plateau. The convergences of the magnetic meridians indicate the approximate path followed by the moving NMP. The NMP is marked by the magenta star just entering the Arctic Ocean area north of the Canadian archipelago as it heads along the line of magnetic meridian convergence towards Siberia.
originally posted by: AdmireTheDistance
Close, but it's actually around 60.0208° South of the North Pole, and 29.9792° North of the equator.
originally posted by: AdmireTheDistance
There is no place called Tunguska. There are some rivers named Tunguska, though. If you're referring to the location of the Tunguska Event, that is over 80 miles away from Lake Baikal. Not really what I'd consider right next to it.
originally posted by: Mianeye
For the geographic poles to shift else were the planet would need to tilt , the magnetic poles have nothing to do with where it's cold, the magnetic poles are the only one moving.
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
Are you under the mistaken impression that the whole Earth itself is tilting and moving? How else would the arctic move?
originally posted by: ignorant_ape
just to clarify this thread - can you please outline what happened diring the last pole shift - and when this occured