Donald Trump freaks, goes on profanity-laced rant during his campaign rally

originally posted by: LSU0408
a reply to: UnBreakable

Remember last year when everyone said he'd fade out after a few weeks, if not sooner? Heh

Ya, he's been consistently leading the GOP polls since last June. Jeb must be pulling his hair out, since most of the pundits coronated Jeb as the GOP dynastic answer to Hillary.

a reply to: AlienSupernova

There are different sections of people there for the different candidates. They did their job by booing. He'd get boos and then the place would erupt in cheers for him. Almost all the candidates got booed and cheered. That's nothing new. He wasn't booed off stage though, just by a crowd that was probably there for Jeb.

a reply to: AlienSupernova

I was not saying he was not booed....that is for effect and it seems to have worked. I am stating he was not booed off stage. He more than held his own. I think he was not expecting the attack that came but he spun it like a business man would.

It should really say something to all of us that the establishment does not want him. He even addressed the governor and her statements she had made and put a great spin on it. He let everyone know he is angry and he should. The country is angry.

originally posted by: aorAki

originally posted by: LSU0408

It's true. You have to be stern with those you're leading or you'll be ran over and taken advantage of.

Balls.

Firm but fair is a much better approach.

There's not much difference between stern and firm. What's the old saying? Spare the rod, spoil the child?

originally posted by: UnBreakable

originally posted by: LSU0408
a reply to: UnBreakable

Remember last year when everyone said he'd fade out after a few weeks, if not sooner? Heh

Ya, he's been consistently leading the GOP polls since last June. Jeb must be pulling his hair out, since most of the pundits coronated Jeb as the GOP dynastic answer to Hillary.

I want to like Jeb, I truly do but he can't get past his envy for Trump. I wish he had balls as big as Trump. But I'm one of the few left that still likes W Bush so wanting to favor Jeb could be bias on my part.

originally posted by: LSU0408

originally posted by: UnBreakable

originally posted by: LSU0408
a reply to: UnBreakable

Remember last year when everyone said he'd fade out after a few weeks, if not sooner? Heh

Ya, he's been consistently leading the GOP polls since last June. Jeb must be pulling his hair out, since most of the pundits coronated Jeb as the GOP dynastic answer to Hillary.

I want to like Jeb, I truly do but he can't get past his envy for Trump. I wish he had balls as big as Trump. But I'm one of the few left that still likes W Bush so wanting to favor Jeb could be bias on my part.

I don't think Jeb wants to be there at all.

I think he was forced, and his "heart" is just not in it.

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: LSU0408

originally posted by: UnBreakable

originally posted by: LSU0408
a reply to: UnBreakable

Remember last year when everyone said he'd fade out after a few weeks, if not sooner? Heh

Ya, he's been consistently leading the GOP polls since last June. Jeb must be pulling his hair out, since most of the pundits coronated Jeb as the GOP dynastic answer to Hillary.

I want to like Jeb, I truly do but he can't get past his envy for Trump. I wish he had balls as big as Trump. But I'm one of the few left that still likes W Bush so wanting to favor Jeb could be bias on my part.

I don't think Jeb wants to be there at all.

I think he was forced, and his "heart" is just not in it.

I like the way you put that. I agree.

originally posted by: LSU0408
a reply to: UnBreakable

Remember last year when everyone said he'd fade out after a few weeks, if not sooner? Heh

He's a show. If he's leading anything, its sensationalism and outlandishness in the tedious, boring process of picking a presidential candidate.

I think most people, who are serious voters, like me. Are waiting for the nonsense to die down, and the couple serious contenders to emerge -- before we have any serious thoughts on who to vote for.

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: LSU0408
a reply to: UnBreakable

Remember last year when everyone said he'd fade out after a few weeks, if not sooner? Heh

He's a show. If he's leading anything, its sensationalism and outlandishness in the tedious, boring process of picking a presidential candidate.

I think most people, who are serious voters, like me. Are waiting for the nonsense to die down, and the couple serious contenders to emerge -- before we have any serious thoughts on who to vote for.

On the GOP side, who are you looking to emerge? Cruz, Rubio, Carson, and Christie are about the only ones left that could rise up in my opinion. Bush and Kasich are probably done for and Carson, who was my first favorite, is too soft spoken. I did enjoy his wittiness last night though, never saw that side of him.

originally posted by: LSU0408
a reply to: UnBreakable

Remember last year when everyone said he'd fade out after a few weeks, if not sooner? Heh

Yeah. I think he is going to do his best to ride this pony to the end.

If for no other reason then to prove to those people, and the GOP that he is a Contender.

originally posted by: LSU0408

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: LSU0408
a reply to: UnBreakable

Remember last year when everyone said he'd fade out after a few weeks, if not sooner? Heh

He's a show. If he's leading anything, its sensationalism and outlandishness in the tedious, boring process of picking a presidential candidate.

I think most people, who are serious voters, like me. Are waiting for the nonsense to die down, and the couple serious contenders to emerge -- before we have any serious thoughts on who to vote for.

On the GOP side, who are you looking to emerge? Cruz, Rubio, Carson, and Christie are about the only ones left that could rise up in my opinion. Bush and Kasich are probably done for and Carson, who was my first favorite, is too soft spoken. I did enjoy his wittiness last night though, never saw that side of him.

I'm atheist. MAJOR supporter of separation of church and state. So its pretty limited. If not impossible.

I'm a futurist and globalist. Progression and Global Unity.

I think everyone should watch Carl Sagan's "Pale Blue Dot" every morning before starting their day.

Very difficult.

I voted for Obama because he said he was a methodical thinker. He said he would form a committee to address each individual issue, come up with a plan, and not address it until then.

I voted for Bush "W" because he had a tax break plan for small businesses. Of course, this plan was thrown in the trash the second he got elected. At least Obama followed through on his methodical thinking. Even though he was stonewalled by the GOP on any attempt whether it made sense or not.

Did you know that the expense of "Bush's War" - - - is not included as part of his presidential expenditure? But, is part of Obama's deficit? I don't like that kind of math.

a reply to: AlienSupernova

Seemed to work well enough for the rant
2nd

Who gets to say "You're fired!" to Trump and that thing on his head when the joke is over and no-one laughs at the punchline?

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: LSU0408
a reply to: UnBreakable

Remember last year when everyone said he'd fade out after a few weeks, if not sooner? Heh

He's a show. If he's leading anything, its sensationalism and outlandishness in the tedious, boring process of picking a presidential candidate.

I think most people, who are serious voters, like me. Are waiting for the nonsense to die down, and the couple serious contenders to emerge -- before we have any serious thoughts on who to vote for.

Out of curiosity, who do you consider a serious candidate from the GOP side who has a realistic chance to win? Cruz? Rubio? Carson? Please. Trump is the only contender who even havs a realistic chance to beat Hillary in national polls. Or do you want Hillary? Because if she wins, it will be eight more years of this. And once she's in there, the bitching you see with this current administration, we'll be yearning for the good 'ol days under Obama

originally posted by: UnBreakable

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: LSU0408
a reply to: UnBreakable

Remember last year when everyone said he'd fade out after a few weeks, if not sooner? Heh

He's a show. If he's leading anything, its sensationalism and outlandishness in the tedious, boring process of picking a presidential candidate.

I think most people, who are serious voters, like me. Are waiting for the nonsense to die down, and the couple serious contenders to emerge -- before we have any serious thoughts on who to vote for.

Out of curiosity, who do you consider a serious candidate from the GOP side who has a realistic chance to win? Cruz? Rubio? Carson? Please. Trump is the only contender who even havs a realistic chance to beat Hillary in national polls. Or do you want Hillary? Because if she wins, it will be eight more years of this. And once she's in there, the bitching you see with this current administration, we'll be yearning for the good 'ol days under Obama

Already answered that. IMO

a reply to: Annee

a reply to: starfoxxx

Drama Queen much?

Get a grip on yourself, man. We're not talking about life or death economics, we're talking about a freaking microphone.

You need to calm down.

Are you kidding me , OP?

Trump says the 'b' word and has a pop at someone doing a bad job and that becomes a stone to throw? Don't normal people all over the world get a bit upset when someone you rely on does a bad job? You know, I reckon a lot of people actaully swear too. Crazy heh?

I think your title gives a lot away, if you think that was a 'profanity laced rant' and warrants the term 'freaks' then, sorry, you don't live in the real world.

You might like your politicians to have two faces, but millions don't.

a reply to: UKTruth

I think your title gives a lot away, if you think that was a 'profanity laced rant' and warrants the term 'freaks' then, sorry, you don't live in the real world.

Just to clarify, it is required by the T&C's of ATS to use the same title as the article being sourced.

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: UKTruth

I think your title gives a lot away, if you think that was a 'profanity laced rant' and warrants the term 'freaks' then, sorry, you don't live in the real world.

Just to clarify, it is required by the T&C's of ATS to use the same title as the article being sourced.

Excuse me? I was referring to the title of this thread.

Do you mean I should have said

I think your title gives a lot away, if you think that was a 'Donald Trump freaks, goes on profanity-laced rant during his campaign rally' is warranted then, sorry, you don't live in the real world.

instead of:

I think your title gives a lot away, if you think that was a 'profanity laced rant' and warrants the term 'freaks' then, sorry, you don't live in the real world.

a reply to: UKTruth

All I am saying is that the OP was required to copy and paste the title from the source article to the title of the thread. If you have beef with the title, the OP is not at fault.

Just saying......