It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
A setting from a local high school? Sadly, no. They are scenes from the Springfield office of The Department of Homeland Security, according to documents made public in federal court.
Among a half-dozen federal agents and support staff in Springfield, dueling personnel complaints have been filed by employees against each other and a former supervisor, records show. An internal investigation of the office at 1550 Main Street is pending and one agent, William Hoyt, has been banned not only from the building - but the parking garage.
Former supervisory Agent Timothy Gaynor - who in emails to his higher-ups likened his job to managing unruly, insubordinate adolescents - was transferred in recent weeks. Gaynor also was under investigation by the Office of Inspector General for a number of personnel complaints while meting out discipline to his staff, according to internal documents. It is unclear from the court records where that investigation stands.
In early 2015, Gaynor sent a disturbing memo entitled "Personnel Safety Concerns About RAC Springfield Office Environment" to a Homeland Security Department supervisor in Boston. It detailed several examples of alleged confrontations between Springfield employees in 2014.
-He alleged Agent Gregory Boucher made hang-up or "heavy breathing" calls to Macy at the office in March of 2014 and they were flagged by caller ID.
-He alleged that Hoyt became "physically aggressive" toward him and balled up his fists during a meeting the same month. "Based on my 16 years of law enforcement experience this is the first time I have encountered such behavior and considered this a personal threat," the memo noted.
-He alleged that agents under his purview continued to be "insolent" and "defiant" and resisted investigative work.
-He alleged Hoyt, and agents Ross Gazzaniga and Timothy Irving got into a fistfight in the men's room at the Homeland Security office in July of 2014.
At any rate, things continued to deteriorate between Macy and Hoyt, according to documents she filed with the court.
She alleges that on Dec. 1, Hoyt entered the office while she was there, and began screaming profanities at Gaynor about her. Then on Dec. 3, Macy said Hoyt came into the office with his wife, punched in the code to the firearms holding room and emerged with "an armful of automatic weapons."
"They went into his office. I heard clicking metal noises. I started dialing 911 and my boss. They heard me. She said 'we are leaving.' My boss told me to go into the office and lock the door," reads a second application Macy filed in Eastern Hampshire District Court for a restraining order on Dec. 9.
The agents there are acting like children…
originally posted by: Athetos
Even just one of those incidences should be grounds for dismissal IMO. Fist fight? Fired. Screaming profanities at someone? Fired. Arm full of firearms that don't pertain to your current job/operation? Fired and arrested.
Good that this came to light. I Hope something is actually done about it.
a reply to: charolais
originally posted by: DexterRiley
a reply to: Athetos
I don't know what one has to do to be canned in the public sector. I've always heard that being a government employee has a job for life. Now I'm beginning to understand why.
-dex
originally posted by: BrianFlanders
It's pretty bizarre when the worst complaints that people have about a Gestapo-like government agency is that it's "inefficient" and "Doesn't work right".
Just sayin'
originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: charolais
Third...last time I checked, the DHS was a law enforcement organisation dedicated to protecting the lives of US citizens, by monitoring and grabbing up terrorists and foiling their nefarious plots. Now, we all know how much bull is involved with that agency, and the reason for its existence, given the amount of overlap there is between the job of the DHS and the job of the FBI for example. However, given that they are there and not going any place, the first rule ought to be to hire people who want to investigate crime, track and eventually catch dangerous individuals, and do not mind doing a little leg work, not to mention getting shot for their trouble if needs be. Simply put, none of the individuals referred to in this article, can possibly be made of the right stuff for that line of work.
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: charolais
The agents there are acting like children…
This country is being run by adult children. Only an adult child is aggressive and trained well enough to claw their way to the top of these hallowed halls. They hide in plain sight. In appearance at first glance they are professional looking enough, but cross them and the temper tantrum, bullying and emotional tidal wave comes out.
Mature people recoil from such behavior, it doesn't make sense. How can you be so old and so childish at the same time. How do you reason with the mind of a five year old?
You can't. They won't listen. When dealing with actual five year olds, you just say, thats nice honey and mostly ignore their flailing about. They'll "grow out of it", right.
link 1
link 2
originally posted by: TrueBrit
There are several parts of this article which really jumped off the page at me. The segment which referred to the agents fitness for duty carriage of a firearm, the segment involving the fist fight, and the part where a reference is made to the agents being unwilling to engage in investigative work..First of all, every single person named in the article probably needs to hand in their badge and gun, or have it taken from them. People who cannot behave like adults, should not be given firearms to use while at work. That is a pretty simple standard to work by, even in a nation with proper respect for the right to bare them at all.
originally posted by: Aazadan
a reply to: charolais
Let me make you more depressed. Everyone in authority acts this way, just like any other adults. The idea is that the above average people fill roles that require a higher level of authority but in practice that doesn't happen. People are petty and irresponsible and there's no recruitment standards that weed that out, in any industry or office.
originally posted by: bg_socalif
Government in general is inefficient. DHS is inefficiancy on steroids.