It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Stating that socialist policies tend to lead to more and more socialist policies, and this leaves a door open to communism is different to claiming "all liberals are commies"...
The only ones who have always used the "oh yeah us liberals are commies" stupid comments are people like yourself who try to stop any discussion of this trend of socialist policies leading to more socialism and then communism...
As for "hater"... Difference of opinion does not equal to hatred... But again, you obviously don't seem to know the difference.
Now look at your next response, an insult... Nice going there.
originally posted by: BuzzyWigs
erm....seriously?
originally posted by: BuzzyWigs
no.
"leaning to the right" is a whole different thing. I (and the SPLC) are talking about people like Westboro Baptist Church, Bundy types who take over a federal building with weapons, etc.
Ron Paul’s New Organization Reportedly Stacked with Extremists
by Ryan Lenz
April 26, 2013
Ron Paul, the libertarian former Texas congressman whose hard-line views are widely admired on the radical right but who claims to reject racism, [bhas started a new organization stacked with a hodgepodge of far-right extremists.
As The Daily Beast reported yesterday, the Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity is ostensibly designed to promote a discourse about U.S. foreign policy. But its advisory board is stacked with what writer James Kirchik characterized as “a bevy of conspiracy theorists, cranks, and apologists for some of the worst regimes on the planet.”
And just who are the far-right luminaries helping guide Paul’s new endeavor?
One is Lew Rockwell, Paul’s former congressional chief of staff who now heads the Ludwig von Mises Institute, an Auburn, Ala., think tank with deep ties to the neo-Confederate movement. There’s Judge Andrew Napolitano of Fox News and journalist Eric Margolis, both 9/11 “truthers” who suspect that the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks may have been orchestrated by the government.
And alongside them sits Butler Shaffer, a Southwestern Law School professor who similarly once asked: “In light of the lies, forgeries, cover-ups, and other deceptions leading to a ‘war’ in Iraq, how can any intellectually honest person categorically deny the possibility of the involvement of American political interest in 9/11?”
...
...
CNSNews.com asked Beirich about their designation of the Family Research Council as a hate group.
“I think there’s a common misunderstanding about the way you get on our Hate List. We post groups on the basis of ideology, not whether they’re violent or not,” she replied.
...
originally posted by: BuzzyWigs
"leaning right" is a bland and rather meaningless term that I would apply (if pressed) to those who are not rabid in their views. Someone who says, "Well, I can relate to what Christ Christie says, but also Bernie has some good points."
That is not EXTREMISM.
...
Oh, so people have to agree with Bernie Sanders in order not to be "extremists" in your opinion... How the hell are Bernie Sander's points of view right leaning?... His points of view are left leaning to socialism, so you are actually agreeing with the assertion that right leaning Americans are "extremists and even possible terrorists" just like the SPLC and the Obama administration claim...
originally posted by: BuzzyWigs
Oh FOR GOD'S SAKE!!! Bernie is not "right leaning". He's also NOT A COMMUNIST!!!!!
originally posted by: BuzzyWigs
What a ridiculous premise. I was talking about people who are able to listen to both sides....How about this: I like SOME of what Rand Paul is saying, and also SOME of what Chris Christie is saying, and SOME of what Kasich is saying........
- but - I'm still paying attention to what Bernie says.
Yeah.
End of chat.
You are ridiculous.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: NoCorruptionAllowed
Dude, I really don't care about the label they use. The point is that these groups are more numerous during Democratic presidencies rather than Republican presidencies. Why is the government only overreaching during Democratic presidencies? As I pointed out earlier in the thread, many big name overreaching policies were enacted during Republican presidencies too. TSA, Patriot Act, torturing prisoners of war, etc. To me this says that these "anti-government groups" or "patriot groups" (if you prefer) aren't what they claim to be. What I see is just a bunch of partisan idiots pretending to care about government overreach when THEIR guy isn't in charge.
originally posted by: BuzzyWigs
a reply to: ElectricUniverse
Oh FOR GOD'S SAKE!!! Bernie is not "right leaning". He's also NOT A COMMUNIST!!!!! What a ridiculous premise. I was talking about people who are able to listen to both sides....How about this: I like SOME of what Rand Paul is saying, and also SOME of what Chris Christie is saying, and SOME of what Kasich is saying........
originally posted by: BuzzyWigs
a reply to: SlapMonkey
Assault with a wooden spoon?
Nah. My mom is half German (so was my dad) - and that spoon waving in the air was enough to stop us fussing.
originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: NoCorruptionAllowed
Dude, I really don't care about the label they use. The point is that these groups are more numerous during Democratic presidencies rather than Republican presidencies. Why is the government only overreaching during Democratic presidencies? As I pointed out earlier in the thread, many big name overreaching policies were enacted during Republican presidencies too. TSA, Patriot Act, torturing prisoners of war, etc. To me this says that these "anti-government groups" or "patriot groups" (if you prefer) aren't what they claim to be. What I see is just a bunch of partisan idiots pretending to care about government overreach when THEIR guy isn't in charge.
I know of plenty of people who saw through both Bush's flavor of tyranny while the Bush's and those in congress paraded under that flag. And it isn't about their guy not being in charge at all. Under Obama, (a murderer of women and children, far more than Bush was), have been so many examples of government overreach to choose from, I'm surprised there hasn't been much more patriot events sooner. And hearing you or anyone say these things just happen when a democrat is in office is ludicrous and out of touch, which is putting it mildly.
BTW, why is it that you didn't notice the fact that during his 30 years Bernie has been flip-flopping in his stance on several policies?