IUPAC announces the verification of the discoveries of four new chemical elements

a reply to: Krazysh0t

Thank you for this information. This is an important discovery I wonder what effect this will have on the world in general?

a reply to: Krazysh0t

Thank you for this information. This is an important discovery I wonder what effect this will have on the world in general?

Pretty cool news, makes me think of nazi zombies Der Reise, where you had to collect element 115 as an Easter egg to enable teleportation and nazi wonder weapons .

Richthofen lives!

originally posted by: intrptr

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: intrptr

Just because the element's period of existence is insignificant to you doesn't mean it is insignificant in the grand scheme of things.

Smashing stuff together and counting the sparks. They can do that forever, the subatomic realm is like the Celestial one. Open ended, boundless, infinite.

The transuranic elements are all radioactive, most are man made. They are part of whats wrong with the world, imo. Nuclear power, Nuclear weapons and nuclear waste.

In chemistry, transuranium elements (also known as transuranic elements) are the chemical elements with atomic numbers greater than 92 (the atomic number of uranium). None of these elements are stable; they decay radioactively into other elements.

Bismuth is actually radioactive too. but it's half life is so long that it is nearly impossible to witness it decay. being radioactive or unstable by itself does not make an element unnatural. many of these transuranic elements are synthesized in stellar explosions in tiny amounts. But in events more energetic than super novae they are probably produced in significant amounts. like gigatons worth in hyper novae or in certain binary systems.

en.wikipedia.org...

Bismuth is weakly radioactive. it is not a transuranic element. perhaps that category should be named trans-bismuth elements.

Bismuth has long been considered as the element with the highest atomic mass that is stable. However, in 2003 it was discovered to be weakly radioactive: its only primordial isotope, bismuth-209, decays via alpha decay with a half life more than a billion times the estimated age of the universe.[5]

That should make Bob Lazar happy. They have just proved the existence of UFO fuel or element 115

a reply to: intrptr

Interesting point.

But is the sub atomic rely really infinite like the celestial one?

If we looked so far into an object what would we see?

Would it be a pure flat surface of light or a vacuum?

One would think that looking in at something has a boundary whereas looking out to anything would be infinite.

It's strange wording but ultimately we are always looking in at something.

a reply to: intrptr

Peter Townshend’s Guru Meher Baba, once said that they’ll never stop finding these elements or parts of matter.

1000 years from now if the world isn’t destroyed because of their discovery of splitting the atom, these guys will still be finding particles and elements and claiming they have some kind of standard model

originally posted by: intrptr

Someone should drop the word "Chemical" from the title. Its the table of elements, not table of chemical elements.

Chemical usually refers to compounds.

Are these more momentary elements, here and gone in an instant?

Whoopee…

There is already a name for that common element: Derivatives.

originally posted by: Willtell
a reply to: intrptr

Peter Townshend’s Guru Meher Baba, once said that they’ll never stop finding these elements or parts of matter.

1000 years from now if the world isn’t destroyed because of their discovery of splitting the atom, these guys will still be finding particles and elements and claiming they have some kind of standard model

It's my belief that they will find more "islands of stability" or even one super-large one "giganeutronium"

originally posted by: stormcell

originally posted by: Willtell
a reply to: intrptr

Peter Townshend’s Guru Meher Baba, once said that they’ll never stop finding these elements or parts of matter.

1000 years from now if the world isn’t destroyed because of their discovery of splitting the atom, these guys will still be finding particles and elements and claiming they have some kind of standard model

It's my belief that they will find more "islands of stability" or even one super-large one "giganeutronium"

You mean more standard models?


It amazes me that they can't even understand gravity and they claim they have so much knowledge


I call it standard bull____

originally posted by: Sublimecraft
a reply to: Krazysh0t

It is good to see scientific advancements that show the awesome wonder of the universe and discovering new parameters to it's make up.

I'm glad that science is ever-evolving - constantly seeking to define that which is yet unknown.

One day science will finally discover that it has been constantly controlled, and stymied and told how to define that which is unknown.

4 years to sift through the data ??

Need to sift through the control schemes that own science....maybe we can get something done then.

originally posted by: ParasuvO

originally posted by: Sublimecraft
a reply to: Krazysh0t

It is good to see scientific advancements that show the awesome wonder of the universe and discovering new parameters to it's make up.

I'm glad that science is ever-evolving - constantly seeking to define that which is yet unknown.

One day science will finally discover that it has been constantly controlled, and stymied and told how to define that which is unknown.

4 years to sift through the data ??

Need to sift through the control schemes that own science....maybe we can get something done then.

Why do you so thoroughly distrust science exactly? What evidence do you have to make these claims of corruption? I mean this thread isn't even related to evolution or climate change and you are still here talking about corruption in science. Why even bother with ANY science then? Just ignore all scientific advancements for the rest of your life and stick your head in the sand. Clearly we all know everything there is to know about the universe already, right?

You clearly don't realize that literally every part of your life you can thank science for, but hey science is corrupt and hiding things. PFFFT!

originally posted by: InMyShell
a reply to: intrptr

Interesting point.

But is the sub atomic rely really infinite like the celestial one?

If we looked so far into an object what would we see?

Would it be a pure flat surface of light or a vacuum?

One would think that looking in at something has a boundary whereas looking out to anything would be infinite.

It's strange wording but ultimately we are always looking in at something.

So I'll run this one by you, its just my own personal take on things…

When they say that atoms are mostly empty space with tiny bits of matter whizzing around? They liken that in scale to the solar system. The sun being the nucleus and planets, the electrons.

So if they smash atoms together that would be like smashing star systems together, which is happening in super energetic regions in places we can see with telescopes.

So, destroying a sun or suns, all at once, would produce a fantastic amount of debris flying everywhere, all bits and pieces of all sizes and shapes, some turning to dust ever finer… and finer… and then reforming into new suns and star systems.

see where I am heading with this?

Part of the 'sparks' would be a piece of earth flying outward at tremendous speed, from the center of the solar system, and saturn and asteroids… the closer we look at the pieces that result from the solar system being destroyed the smaller the pieces get, ad infinitum.

Theoretically, one could log each and everyone, but who would want to? Its just bits of matter from a destroyed atom or atoms zinging about.

Yah yah, discovery and science and all that. Thing is, the science they always develop from such research is ever more destructive weapons first, then methods of controlling people with faster ever more powerful computing systems.

I realized that long ago in the early stages of computer evolution and thats why I got out of the industry.

originally posted by: NewzNose
a reply to: Sublimecraft

IMO, science is not absolute; it expands, it questions, and is ever revealing truths waiting to be discovered.

It is extremely absolute, I find it hilarious that in peoples imaginations science and scientists alike are free to discover and reveal what they wish.

If that was the case, we would already know EVERYTHING about EVERYTHING.

Something controls science, very successfully too, it is as badly controlled as all the religions combined..........

a reply to: stormbringer1701

All matter eventually decays… Second law of thermo dynamic, see the department of entropy.

a reply to: Willtell

You made a funny….

a reply to: Krazysh0t

I do not distrust SCIENCE, but I disbelieve that it is some kind of entity that has awareness and only one goal.

Why do YOU believe the mantra that science is what it is, and is only about revealing the truth of things ??

On this planet, of all places !!



When I look at the schooling scientists receive, and just how much of it is too CONTROL HOW, and WHAT, and WHY, and then not say that SCIENCE, is a learned and highly controllable SYSTEM.......

I say that SCIENCE is what it will be ALLOWED to be.

THIS IS PURE FACT.

originally posted by: Cynic

originally posted by: intrptr

Someone should drop the word "Chemical" from the title. Its the table of elements, not table of chemical elements.

Chemical usually refers to compounds.

Are these more momentary elements, here and gone in an instant?

Whoopee…

There is already a name for that common element: Derivatives.

Ahh, flash in the pan money goes the same way, decaying to nothing in others hands.

You made a funny, too.

originally posted by: stormcell

originally posted by: Willtell
a reply to: intrptr

Peter Townshend’s Guru Meher Baba, once said that they’ll never stop finding these elements or parts of matter.

1000 years from now if the world isn’t destroyed because of their discovery of splitting the atom, these guys will still be finding particles and elements and claiming they have some kind of standard model

It's my belief that they will find more "islands of stability" or even one super-large one "giganeutronium"

Single Unifying Field thingy? Imo, not until they are able to isolate, find, control, induce ad add gravity to their cake mix. As is something is missing…