Rape Allegations: Media Hunts Bill Cosby, Celebrates Bill Clinton

a reply to: IAMTAT

Care to respond to what I posted? Are you willingly applying a double standard for political reasons?

a reply to: IAMTAT

From your source:

No legal action, civil or criminal, was taken against Clinton or Broaddrick based on the allegation and the case was dismissed in 2001.

originally posted by: muse7
Just waiting for the OP to thrown in some Benghazi and sprinkle some planned parenthood into the mix as well...

We could have a super conspiracy that Sorcha faal would salivate over 😂

Nope...YOU brought up Benghazi and Planned Parenthood. BOTH off topic...and, overall, a truly stupid attempt at deflection from a serious topic; interesting you think allegations of rape and sexual assault so humorous.
Take your trolling elsewhere.

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: IAMTAT

Care to respond to what I posted? Are you willingly applying a double standard for political reasons?

Nope. YOU claim Trump is a rapist. I don't agree...and neither does his wife, who recanted/revised her statement....and ultimately stated "the story was totally without merit". Nice try, though.

By all means, though,...call anyone you want a rapist.

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: IAMTAT

Care to respond to what I posted? Are you willingly applying a double standard for political reasons?

Nope. YOU claim Trump is a rapist. I don't agree...and neither does his wife, who recanted/revised her statement....and ultimately stated "the story was totally without merit". Nice try, though.

By all means, though,...call anyone you want a rapist.

I didn't claim it. His wife did in a court deposition and only denied after being forced to keep quite by court order. That's more telling than a case against Clinton that was completely dropped.

This is cognitive dissonance.

You are applying a double standard while stumping about political figures applying a double standard.

Consider it a tale of two Trumps and you are only willing to recognize one tale because the other does not fit your political desires.

So much for honesty and integrity, huh? I suppose a positive to all this is now we know for certain that your word doesn't count for much.

a reply to: introvert

SURE you accused Trump of being a rapist...as well as a sexual abuser.

Don't lie....You claimed it on the previous page (your quoted response highlighted)...and your statement is there for all to see (unless you still have time to edit it out).
Better cover your tracks a little better.

a reply to: IAMTAT

Don't confuse allegations of sexual abuse and rape with allegations of infidelity.


True. Apparently Trump did both.

originally posted by: IAMTAT
a reply to: introvert

SURE you accused Trump of being a rapist...as well as a sexual abuser.

Don't lie....You claimed it on the previous page (your quoted response highlighted)...and your statement is there for all to see (unless you still have time to edit it out).
Better cover your tracks a little better.

a reply to: IAMTAT

Don't confuse allegations of sexual abuse and rape with allegations of infidelity.


True. Apparently Trump did both.

Nice deflection. His wife accused him of rape in a court deposition and was only silenced after ordered by the courts. That is what informed my comments.

I also used the word "apparently". That's very important in the matter of context. Did you miss that?

You're digging the hole deeper and deeper.

Do you denounce Trump's treatment of women, including infidelity that was openly admitted by Trump, as you did in the OP of Bill Clinton?

Mike Tyson.
Next.....

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: introvert
Just as a side note: Did you know that Trump was once accused of rape by his own wife?

Which one? I cannot keep track of them all.

The foreign born one.

Politicizing rape.

Such class.

a reply to: introvert
I know it's an inconvenient truth where your argument is concerned...but, for the last time:

Ivana Trump's own, most recent, words is her final word on whether or not she was raped by her husband.

"I have recently read some comments attributed to me from nearly 30 years ago at a time of very high tension during my divorce from Donald. The story is totally without merit. Donald and I are the best of friends and together have raised 3 children that we love and are very proud of. I have nothing but fondness for Donald and wish him the best of luck on his campaign. Incidentally, I think he would make an incredible president."

You may continue to choose to ignore her own words, just as you may continue to assert her husband raped her...but she said them; said them very publicly...and THAT makes your assertion null and void.

Naturally, I don't expect you to let actual facts get in the way of your troll-like mindset (I never do), but I am personally convinced by Ivana Trump's own, most recent and most public statement regarding her husband (quoted above).

That said, I'll not be responding to any of your very childish attempts to derail this thread.
Others may wish to continue to indulge and encourage your trolling...but then, limp minds think alike.

originally posted by: zazzafrazz
Politicizing rape.

Such class.

I think you can thank Hillary Clinton for politicizing sexual infidelity and politicizing feminism. She stayed with an admitted adulterer and suspected rapist for political reasons.

a reply to: DBCowboy

Whatever gets you through the night Hunny Bunny.

a reply to: IAMTAT

just as you may continue to assert her husband raped her

She said it. Not me.

You may continue to choose to ignore her own words

I'm taking her for her words and I also recognize what she is allowed to say according to court order. She has been silenced and cannot tell her story of violation and rape. Wont you stand up for her one bit?

Naturally, I don't expect you to let actual facts get in the way of your troll-like mindset (I never do), but I am personally convinced by Ivana Trump's own, most recent and most public statement regarding her husband (quoted above).

That said, I'll not be responding to any of your very childish attempts to derail this thread.
Others may wish to continue to indulge and encourage your trolling...but then, limp minds think alike.

So you are willing to dismiss one case, but highlight another, in which the case was dropped...not silenced by court order, to make a political point.

Call it trolling or whatever you wish, but the fact remains that you are willing to demonize one side for transgressions against women, but uphold the other despite similar circumstances.

That is dishonest, reprehensible and a clear sign that you are not fit to lecture anyone on what is right or wrong.

You should be ashamed of yourself for such a double standard.

a reply to: IAMTAT

Other victims have mentioned Clinton's tactic of turning a kiss into a bite and then using continued biting lip pressure to subdue them; a tactic often used by rapists to disable their victims and force them into submission.

Where are you getting that from exactly? I'm no expert and I doubt you are either which leads me to believe it might have been an "anonymous expert's" statements to Newsmax regarding the Broaddrick allegations.

Let me tell you something else very suspicious about the Broaddrick allegation. There are supposedly three people she told about the rape in the immediate aftermath (and her then husband, Gary Hickey, wasn't one of them) who all allegedly remember seeing her bitten lip:

Co-worker Norma Kelsey, Kelsey's sister and her then lover, later husband, David Broaddrick.

While it's not a stretch to believe that Broaddrick might lie to boost the credibility of his wife's story, what about the two Kelsey sisters? Well, it turns out that as governor, Bill Clinton commuted the sentence of the man who had murdered their father, making him eligible for parole.

Bill Clinton is and was a terrible person.

As president he was a traitor to the middle and lower classes in the Glass–Steagall Act repeal.

He was bought.

Of course any democrat is always better than any republican nevertheless Clinton was a terrible president


Economically he got a break in that the tech boom had started but like Obama did nothing for the lower classes. No new initiatives to bring economic stability to the middle class. Then there was NAFTA another corporate boondoggle he passed similar to this creep Obama and the TPP.


Internationally Clinton sat on hands and could have stopped a genocide in Rwanda but didn’t do so when he easily could have activated a UN rescue plan, so there he was a disgrace as a moral president.


And yes there were legitimate rape charges against him and if he weren’t president he’d probably be in jail now

I think his past has caught up with him

But I can't help feeling these women are
Like the mafia
Who wish to see men enslaved

In Australia there is talk about a register
For men so that any women can look
Up your whole history

It was only a few weeks ago
That there was this crisis of domestic
Violence that was sweeping the nation
Men were beating up women
So the media claimed

The government gave them 100 million
Dollars to help fight it

It must off fixed the problem overnight
Because I haven't heard any more
About it.

There is no crisis
It was a false flag

To me the only 2 women of value
Was the mother of Jesus
And my own mother

Both obeyed God and obeyed men

When you choose a women
Choose wisely
Cause the wrong choice could destroy you

alright, all i gotta say is whomever wrote this trash should win a Darwin award for being a pile of stupid #s, this article is a piece of #, it's just too bad it's not on paper because i would have loved to wipe my ass with it then mail it back to the dumb #in moron who wrote this lame ass #ing piece of garbage... Stick your head in a blender and turn it on, please, i #in beg you..

originally posted by: introvert
Who cares?

If there is any wrongdoing the courts will take care of it. Why are you trying to make this Bill Cosby drama/gossip in to a political matter? That's what you tried to do in the other thread.

How about we let the courts do their job and leave to the celebrity gossip to the American Idol-types?

My apologies if you are an American Idol-type.

That's a bit naive, especially for someone frequenting ATS. It's not as simple as "let the courts figure it out; they are just."

First, on a the racial level there often is a double standard for who gets brought to justice or the level of consequences for black versus white.

Second, it would seem that there also is a major difference between how the powerful or uber rich get treated in the justice system and media versus those whom are not. This is a strange case because Cosby does have money and some power.

Then there is the tertiary and more conspiratorial level, in which one may posit that Clinton got away with it because he plays ball for the oligarchy or PTSB whereas Cosby didn't because he somehow went against the powers. Or, he even got framed or is being targeted.

It's hard to know.