It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Xtrozero
originally posted by: Bedlam
And there should have been a .44 in the bottom drawer and it's gone, need to see where it went. Also got two knives in here. LOL
What are you going to do, stab them after you shoot them? Ah walking dead scenario?
originally posted by: Bedlam
A sidearm for short range use is different than one for medium to long range, which is different still from a shotgun or rifle. Thus, having more than one firearm isn't cause for a psychiatric examination, as you believe, it's simply a question of what you're planning to do with the firearm and at what range, and the sort of energy delivery you'll need when the round arrives.
originally posted by: rossacus
a reply to: Ksihkehe
I fear guns? Is that what you got from what I posted? Lmao. I fear the people that think they are doing a public service by carrying a gun, some self righteous vigilantes that take it upon themselves to resolve crime, that's what I fear, their lack of self awareness.
If gun owners don't fear the possibility than why carryone. The just incase excuse is only a mask to the fear of the possibility rather than better to have one than not need one.
Your only convincing yourself with non fear based justifications. Many have guns at home and don't feel the need to carry them on the streets cos they have less paranoia and far more logical thought processes.
originally posted by: rossacus
a reply to: rockintitz
Not for guns. But in the home I can understand, everyone to themselves. On the street and in public definetly not. It's creates more problems that it could possibly solve.
It all stemmed from my first post which was highlighting the OP'S delusional state that by him carrying a gun he is protecting me. Statements like that is why I have such a strong opinion about people carrying guns.
Sorry about thread drift OP. I think others have answered it
My point in that post that the desire to have a gun is based on fear. A fear that many will attribute with sentences like "better to have one than not". That thought process derives from a fear of the unknown, that's all, Wetherby people wish to acknowledge it or not..
originally posted by: rossacus
a reply to: VashTheStampede
How many crimes have you stopped or how many criminals have you killed recently? Resolved any hostage situations this week on your days off duty?
If the answer is no I request you defer from the delusional that by somehow carrying a gun it is protecting people like me. All you are doing is helping alleviate your own paranoia, nothing more.
This complex you have developed as a result of serving the public is incredibly dangerous, projecting your insecurities onto people that aren't as fearful (aware as you would say) as you.
You don't protect me. You may have done when a cop (on duty) but in no way shape or form does you desiring to carry a weapon make me any safer. I am not sure why anyone would feel that way.
And if the answer was yes you have, than you are taking the law into your own hands which is even more dangerous than your perception.
originally posted by: rossacus
I fear guns? Is that what you got from what I posted? Lmao. I fear the people that think they are doing a public service by carrying a gun, some self righteous vigilantes that take it upon themselves to resolve crime, that's what I fear, their lack of self awareness.
originally posted by: rossacus
If gun owners don't fear the possibility than why carryone. The just incase excuse is only a mask to the fear of the possibility rather than better to have one than not need one.
originally posted by: rossacus
Your only convincing yourself with non fear based justifications. Many have guns at home and don't feel the need to carry them on the streets cos they have less paranoia and far more logical thought processes.
originally posted by: seagull
a reply to: VashTheStampede
I shouldn't think so. Buying them both from the same dealer, correct? Nothing that would even remotely trigger any red flags.
originally posted by: seagull
I shouldn't think so. Buying them both from the same dealer, correct? Nothing that would even remotely trigger any red flags.
It's that mentality that doesn't scare me, but I have to be very weary of. You feel because you have a gun it's your obligation to protect the vulnerable. Taking the law into your own hands in some sort of vocation?how could you possibly help me? If someone pulls a gun out on me and attempt to rob me, you would shoot him? Be the saviour of the masses?
As I have stated in other threads people with your rationale feel like you are immune from human urges and behaviour. You throw about phrases such as law abiding and sane as though you will never fall victim to depression, heart break and anger. You are one knock to the head away from seeing the world completely different, one genetic disposition from reevaluating the people around you.
You are one affair away from this dramatic cognitive change, one loss of someone close to you, one job redundancy, one bankruptcy away, the list is never ending. You are at the mercy of your hormones and how your dorment primal urges dictate your cognitive function.
I can acknowledge this. People that feel they are doing a social justice for the masses cannot. The fact you feel you are doing a service to the public, to me, shows me you see the world in a completely different way, and in my opinion, already have the characteristics that will help promote paranoid thoughts if your mental state was ever to decline, like most people.
And for the record please please please, like many others on ATS, don't ever tell me you are protecting me when you have a gun, as though I rely on your insecurities as some form of protection. People with knifes would say the same but you would think they are crazy. I'm not sure if this self righteous attitude stems from the educations system, the constitution or a combination of all of the above with insecurities, but please be aware you are completely wrong and delusional if residing in this perspective.
This is not a troll post, this is out of frustration from ass hole type mentalities that will eventually cost me my life, not save me. Not directly at you, but to all the people who have posted similar delusions of grandeur type responses.
originally posted by: rossacus
a reply to: LadyGreenEyes
You do realise I can simply reverse everything you have typed and it be equally valid right?
People with guns prevent crimes, I put it to you that people with guns cause more crimes than ones prevented. Ok I'll stop...your response is far to easy unfortunately.
originally posted by: rossacus
a reply to: Ksihkehe
Perfect response apart from the usual comparisons of cars. You admit you do it for your own needs and not for the needs of others around you. I would never be wary of you because you don't treat it as a noble cause. Thankyou.
originally posted by: rossacus
a reply to: dazbog
1...I have apologised to the OP for the thread drift, although the question was already answered.
2...you are further creating a thread drift by responding and picking up on a joke and becoming emotionally involved on his behalf. Be more self aware in future.
3 I never apologise for a joke, if you don't have the ability to distinguish joke from plain insult that is unfortunately your problem, not mine.
4 grow up. Why are people on ats so adverse to jokes and turn them into social crimes. The t &cs haven't changed to my understanding. You haven't witnessed a social injustice so don't act like it. Really pathetic stance. Seriously.
Plus the OP has created a thread when he knows fine well the answer, when any sane person would ask the people he purchased it off before looking for validation on a conspiracy website. If he genuinely wanted to know rather than an announcement, you simply ask why from where u got it. Simple.
I strongly suggest you grow a pair and stop being offended on other people's behalf.