It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
On Sunday morning, Bernie Sanders addressed the Veterans’ Affairs scandals during an interview with Bob Schieffer on CBS’ “Face the Nation.” During the six-minute segment, the Vermont senator and Democratic presidential candidate made it clear that he believes taking care of military veterans is a high priority. He outlined plans to address long wait times and hinted at criminal prosecution for those who falsified documents and “gamed” the system.
Schieffer hit Bernie Sanders hard with questions regarding the long wait times and lack of care many veterans have endured with the VA. Bernie Sanders is the chairman of the Senate Veterans Affairs Committee, and interview hit on some important points for those who rely on the service to get their medical care.
Sanders addressed the problem as a multi-faceted issue.
“What’s very clear to everybody right now is that in many parts of the country the VA simply do not have the doctors and the staff to make sure the veterans got timely care. The system was then gamed, which is absolutely reprehensible, which must be dealt with through criminal prosecution … We must be sure that never happens again.”
The Senate has passed the Sanders-McCain Veterans Bill that will allow vets to go to private providers if they can’t get an appointment at a VA facility, and fund the building of 26 with only three Republicans voting no.
The Republican brigade of senators who claim that the bill is too expensive was led by Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-AL) who claimed that bill creates a new unlimited “entitlement for veterans.” He said that three years worth of spending on vets is too much, and he demanded that the Senate offset the cost with spending cuts. Sessions said that he can’t suggest to his colleagues that the budget violation in the bill be waived.
originally posted by: DBCowboy
Sanders is the chairman to the Veterans Committee? Then he's one of the bastards that has been screwing us over for decades.
originally posted by: JohnnyCanuck
originally posted by: DBCowboy
Sanders is the chairman to the Veterans Committee? Then he's one of the bastards that has been screwing us over for decades.
Maybe...but one person can't control all the votes. However, voting records are available for inspection, and they would tell the story. Wouldn't it make sense to see if Sanders votes the same way that he talks before calling him names?
Can you name me one candidate in the past 20 years that has been against veterans?
Sanders is the chairman to the Veterans Committee? Then he's one of the bastards that has been screwing us over for decades.
originally posted by: buster2010
a reply to: DBCowboy
Can you name me one candidate in the past 20 years that has been against veterans?
Can you name one that has gone out of his way to make things better for veterans?
Sanders is the chairman to the Veterans Committee? Then he's one of the bastards that has been screwing us over for decades.
So you are clueless on how things work huh? Just because he is the chairman doesn't mean he gets what he wants.
originally posted by: AlaskanDad
a reply to: jheated5
Too much Koolaid and not enough facts, makes your post weak and pointless, when we're considering the big picture!
Post failed so please try again!
originally posted by: DBCowboy
originally posted by: buster2010
a reply to: DBCowboy
Can you name me one candidate in the past 20 years that has been against veterans?
Can you name one that has gone out of his way to make things better for veterans?
Sanders is the chairman to the Veterans Committee? Then he's one of the bastards that has been screwing us over for decades.
So you are clueless on how things work huh? Just because he is the chairman doesn't mean he gets what he wants.
I can't name one politician that has done anything positive for veterans.
And if the Chairman isn't responsible, then I don't know how to draw pictures so you'd understand.