posted on Dec, 23 2015 @ 07:05 PM
a reply to:
burdman30ott6
thats a much more realistic approach though
it was more likely to pass if it was just an audit
then when you find evidence of wrong doing you can use that to build a case and get the public behind you (which takes time)
then the other politicians would be pretty much forced to vote on conducting a full in depth review
the time wasnt right
this way it passed at least
ron paul had unrealistic expectations that could have gotten it shot down
then nothing would have been done
(i dont know why im trying to attempt reason with a trumpeter though
your opinions may as well be set in stone
outdated the second they were formed
never to be changed again
)
edit on 23-12-2015 by fartlordsupreme because: (no reason given)