It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: peskyhumans
a reply to: LesMisanthrope
No doubt, but he got 59 students to sign it.
Think about that. 59 of our best and brightest attending one of our countries finest universities, who will no doubt someday be leaders of our country, signed a document to repeal part of our Constitution.
That should deeply worry everybody.
originally posted by: marg6043
a reply to: peskyhumans
And to think that most of the students that signed the petition, will become leaders and prominent members of our society and even politicians with the help of the stigma of attending one of our most prestigious educational system to become the stupid leaders that keep eroding our constitutional rights.
Incredible.
originally posted by: reldra
originally posted by: Vroomfondel
originally posted by: marg6043
a reply to: reldra
I am sure that it was a propaganda piece, just to prove a point.
It was definitely a propaganda piece showing how ridiculously pc higher education has become. That is why the ATS pc police are populating this thread with denial. Their own kind are shown being too stupid to see how ridiculous this really is.
Yes, it was a propaganda piece.
Who, exactly are the ATS PC police?
originally posted by: peskyhumans
a reply to: introvert
He didn't change the meaning.
"I want to repeal the first amendment because we shouldn't allow bullying"
"Our entire Constitution should be a safe zone"
"Repeal the first amendment because people shouldn't be exposed to offensive language"
He didn't say anything to change the meaning of the petition. They signed it because they don't believe in free speech.
Believe it or not, free speech allows for offensive language. No part of our Constitution protects you from bullying. In a free country citizens are allowed to say offensive things.
The problem is the liberal politically correct mindset. It doesn't belong in a free country.
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: peskyhumans
a reply to: LesMisanthrope
No doubt, but he got 59 students to sign it.
Think about that. 59 of our best and brightest attending one of our countries finest universities, who will no doubt someday be leaders of our country, signed a document to repeal part of our Constitution.
That should deeply worry everybody.
59 out of over 12,000.
Context is key.
originally posted by: KawRider9
a reply to: peskyhumans
Bunch of mental midgets!
These snowflakes are in for a rude awakening once they hit the real world.
originally posted by: Vroomfondel
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: peskyhumans
a reply to: LesMisanthrope
No doubt, but he got 59 students to sign it.
Think about that. 59 of our best and brightest attending one of our countries finest universities, who will no doubt someday be leaders of our country, signed a document to repeal part of our Constitution.
That should deeply worry everybody.
59 out of over 12,000.
Context is key.
"Proper" context is key. 59 in less than an hour. Not 59 out of 12,000. Liberal twist at its best.
originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
If anyone honestly thinks the First Amendment is going to be repealed just because some petition was signed then they need to get their heads checked. This is nothing more than another story to distract us from the real issue. This is a non-issue because nothing will come of it.
originally posted by: peskyhumans
a reply to: introvert
59 is still 59. For Yale students this number should be 0.
originally posted by: Vroomfondel
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: peskyhumans
a reply to: LesMisanthrope
No doubt, but he got 59 students to sign it.
Think about that. 59 of our best and brightest attending one of our countries finest universities, who will no doubt someday be leaders of our country, signed a document to repeal part of our Constitution.
That should deeply worry everybody.
59 out of over 12,000.
Context is key.
"Proper" context is key. 59 in less than an hour. Not 59 out of 12,000. Liberal twist at its best.
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: peskyhumans
What these students assume, is that they think actual legislation could even remove freedoms.
They aren't granted by the government, therefor they cannot be removed by the government.