Melting steel?

I'm sure that many more are reading these posts than posters.
It's simple there are no sounds of explosives in any of the videos.
There was never any physical evidence of explosives used.
99% of the worlds experts do not believe there was explosives used.

a reply to: skyeagle409

Now, let's try WTC 2, and point out the video time lines where you claim, demolition explosions are heard.

Not heard, seen..

a reply to: DeceptioVisus

Simple. To prove that there is no case for explosives at ground zero. Now, explain why these explosive demolitions did not fling structural columns anywhere.

originally posted by: samkent
I'm sure that many more are reading these posts than posters.
It's simple there are no sounds of explosives in any of the videos.
There was never any physical evidence of explosives used.
99% of the worlds experts do not believe there was explosives used.

Unsubstantiated claim...

originally posted by: skyeagle409
a reply to: DeceptioVisus

Simple. To prove that there is no case for explosives at ground zero. Now, explain why these explosive demolitions did not fling structural columns anywhere.

Another pointless and irrelevant post...

a reply to: wildb

Just to let you know that demolition explosions make a lot of noise, which you don't hear in the WTC videos.

Here is another example of what demolition explosions sound like.

a reply to: wildb

The demolition explosions you hear in that video is what you don't hear as WTC 1, WTC 2, and WTC 7 collapse.

originally posted by: skyeagle409
a reply to: wildb

Just to let you know that demolition explosions make a lot of noise, which you don't hear in the WTC videos.

Here is another example of what demolition explosions sound like.

Again, Another pointless and irrelevant post...

a reply to: wildb

He is correct because the overwhelming majority of architects, structural and civil engineers, demolition experts and firefighters do not support the claims of 9/11 conspiracy theorist.

a reply to: skyeagle409

Simple. To prove that there is no case for explosives at ground zero. Now, explain why these explosive demolitions did not fling structural columns anywhere.

Anyone who didn't ride the short bus to school everyday can explain it.
And if you can't you must have been on that bus.

a reply to: wildb

The video proves my point that WTC 1, WTC 2, and WTC 7 were not taken down by demolition explosives.

originally posted by: skyeagle409
a reply to: wildb

The demolition explosions you hear in that video is what you don't hear as WTC 1, WTC 2, and WTC 7 collapse.

Hundreds if not thousands heard just that..

a reply to: randyvs

Your video is not evidence that explosives were responsible for the destruction at ground zero.

originally posted by: skyeagle409
a reply to: wildb

The video proves my point that WTC 1, WTC 2, and WTC 7 were not taken down by demolition explosives.

No it does not...

a reply to: wildb

Considering that you are unable to post the WTC video time lines where explosions are heard, I have to conclude that your comment is false.

a reply to: wildb

Considering that you can plainly hear the loud sounds of demolition explosions in that video, which you don't hear in the WTC videos, I am right on the money.

a reply to: skyeagle409

Your video is not evidence that explosives were responsible for the destruction at ground zero.

I know that. It simply demonstrates your thinking.
And how obvious it is that you are here to bog down any
productive discussion about 911.

Like I said pal, tell the truth, the whole truth.

a reply to: randyvs

Considering that you have failed to post evidence of molten steel, nuclear bombs, thermite and explosives at ground zero, you have no case.

originally posted by: skyeagle409
a reply to: wildb

Considering that you are unable to post the WTC video time lines where explosions are heard, I have to conclude that your comment is false.

I am very able, my comment is not false as its my opinion..

originally posted by: skyeagle409
a reply to: wildb

Considering that you can plainly hear the loud sounds of demolition explosions in that video, which you don't hear in the WTC videos, I am right on the money.

No you are not, lack of sound is not evidence of anything..