It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Creep Thumper
They certainly went out of their way to make him ugly. Same thing happened to the reconstruction of Tutankhamen.
Pathetic.
For those accustomed to traditional Sunday school portraits of Jesus, the sculpture of the dark and swarthy Middle Eastern man that emerges from Neave's laboratory is a reminder of the roots of their faith. "The fact that he probably looked a great deal more like a darker-skinned Semite than westerners are used to seeing him pictured is a reminder of his universality," says Charles D. Hackett, director of Episcopal studies at the Candler School of Theology in Atlanta. "And [it is] a reminder of our tendency to sinfully appropriate him in the service of our cultural values."
Neave emphasizes that his re-creation is simply that of an adult man who lived in the same place and at the same time as Jesus. As might well be expected, not everyone agrees.
originally posted by: Creep Thumper
They certainly went out of their way to make him ugly. Same thing happened to the reconstruction of Tutankhamen.
Pathetic.
originally posted by: Spider879
originally posted by: Creep Thumper
They certainly went out of their way to make him ugly. Same thing happened to the reconstruction of Tutankhamen.
Pathetic.
which one of the reconstruction of Tut, if it's last one yeah that was pretty bad, but the Ramses one was even worst.
originally posted by: deliberator
Hi. A thread on this has already been started.
ATS Link