EXCLUSIVE: Sarin materials brought via Turkey & mixed in Syrian ISIS camps – Turkish MP to RT

www.rt.com...

ISIS terrorists in Syria received all necessary materials to produce deadly sarin gas via Turkey, a Turkish MP claimed, citing evidence from an abruptly closed criminal case. Speaking to RT, Eren Erdem said there is grounds to believe of a cover up.

Well, I believe this is a war crime. This should stop WW3 right?

It seems that Turkey is employing the same tactics as the west and their governments to get things done.....

I hope none of you will go quietly when you are drafted.

a reply to: benwyatt

Ah! You used RT as a source. Unfortunately, that will be dismissed very quickly, what with RT being Russian, and every story personally written by Putin!
If it's not reported by the mainstream corporate media, then it's just Russian propaganda, apparently! Although, given the track record of government and media lying, I find it amusing people still claim what they say is true, especially on a site like this.

I seem to remember, going back a couple of years, reports of chemicals, Sarin being found on trucks leaving Turkey for ISIS controlled territory. So not a new allegation,

a reply to: benwyatt

RT and a link that doesn't work.

originally posted by: Britguy
I seem to remember, going back a couple of years, reports of chemicals, Sarin being found on trucks leaving Turkey for ISIS controlled territory. So not a new allegation,

There was Sarin from Libya, earlier this year.

Link not working

originally posted by: sosobad
Link not working

www.rt.com...

Nothing credible I can see as of now.

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04

originally posted by: sosobad
Link not working

www.rt.com...

Nothing credible I can see as of now.

Why not? This was reported awhile back by Turkish media not RT. What makes you say not credible?

a reply to: sosobad

It's an out of favor opposition member who has reasons to want to hurt the government.

Not credible does not mean wrong, it just means not credible.

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: sosobad

It's an out of favor opposition member who has reasons to want to hurt the government.

Not credible does not mean wrong, it just means not credible.

He has evidence that he is presenting to parliment.

Here it is being reported in October

www.cihan.com.tr...

So your reasoning that this is not credible is because it goes against the governmental narrative? How does that work? Was those apposed to Hitler or Stalin not credible because they appose those in power. That's some messed up logic.

originally posted by: sosobad

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: sosobad

It's an out of favor opposition member who has reasons to want to hurt the government.

Not credible does not mean wrong, it just means not credible.

He has evidence that he is presenting to parliment.

Here it is being reported in October

www.cihan.com.tr...

So your reasoning that this is not credible is because it goes against the governmental narrative? How does that work? Was those apposed to Hitler or Stalin not credible because they appose those in power. That's some messed up logic.

I can not read that to critique it.

Nice logical fallacy. Not worth time to respond to such an inane comment. If you can't figure out possible ulterior motives for him to lie then try again.

a reply to: OccamsRazor04

Yet here you are responding. No logical fallacy at all. You said not credible because he is the opposition.

originally posted by: sosobad
a reply to: OccamsRazor04

Yet here you are responding. No logical fallacy at all. You said not credible because he is the opposition.

Try reading my post again. If you read it again and can't see where you went wrong English may not be for you.

a reply to: OccamsRazor04

It's an out of favor opposition member who has reasons to want to hurt the government.

Whatever buddy, luckily this thread and ats isn't about what you do and do not find credible. You've had your say. Anything to add beside your own personal criticisms on people's credibility?

originally posted by: sosobad
a reply to: OccamsRazor04

It's an out of favor opposition member who has reasons to want to hurt the government.

Whatever buddy, luckily this thread and ats isn't about what you do and do not find credible. You've had your say. Anything to add beside your own personal criticisms on people's credibility?

Yes. The evidence to back his claims up.

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04

originally posted by: sosobad
a reply to: OccamsRazor04

It's an out of favor opposition member who has reasons to want to hurt the government.

Whatever buddy, luckily this thread and ats isn't about what you do and do not find credible. You've had your say. Anything to add beside your own personal criticisms on people's credibility?

Yes. The evidence to back his claims up.

What about it? You want it before he submits it to parliament?

originally posted by: sosobad

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04

originally posted by: sosobad
a reply to: OccamsRazor04

It's an out of favor opposition member who has reasons to want to hurt the government.

Whatever buddy, luckily this thread and ats isn't about what you do and do not find credible. You've had your say. Anything to add beside your own personal criticisms on people's credibility?

Yes. The evidence to back his claims up.

What about it? You want it before he submits it to parliament?

I want it before I consider him credible. That's kind of how it works. Maybe you choose to buy in and believe for no reason, I don't.

Claim.
Evidence that checks out.
Belief.

It amazes me that even when we see truth, it's still only half truth.

So who brought the materials to Turkey?

This goes well beyond NATO's only ME country going rogue.

The world should get their pound of flesh from Turkey for their role but we should not permit the real "deciders" as Bush liked to say, off the hook so easily.

Oh and a side note. I would like to take a moment to offer thanks to some of the brightest Americans on the planet. Becoming a Supreme Court Justice is a lifelong goal for only the best and brightest minds. As such, your contribution with acknowledging corporations as people who can vote and the legal permission to propagandize America news media and to turn a blind eye on countless election fraud scandals shows me that with enough focus, I can be a # too.

a reply to: OccamsRazor04

You never said that originally though, it went from RT not credible, to opposition not credible, to wanting the evidence before the Turkish parliament gets it. You are trying very hard to find a problem with the story.

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04


Claim.
Evidence that checks out.
Belief.

Ah!
A bit like the multiple claims of Russia invading Crimea / Ukraine?
A bit like the claims of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq?
A bit like the claims the US government was "surprised" by the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbour?

See, we get bombarded all the time with claims of things by the government and it's agencies, while they never actually produce any evidence to back it up, yet people claim it's from credible sources.

originally posted by: sosobad
a reply to: OccamsRazor04

You never said that originally though, it went from RT not credible, to opposition not credible, to wanting the evidence before the Turkish parliament gets it. You are trying very hard to find a problem with the story.

More falsehoods from you. This is what I said.

Nothing credible I can see as of now.

Not credible does not mean wrong, it just means not credible.

Just because you jump on every pro Russia story and buy it immediately does not mean I will.

I will sit back, evaluate the evidence, and make an informed opinion.