It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Tashfeen Malik reportedly passed all three thorough and rigorous background checks despite questionable social media posts about
Tashfeen Malik, who along with her husband killed 14 people in Southern California, reportedly passed three background checks by American officials before she moved from Pakistan to the United States and none of them found her social media posts about jihad.
The New York Times reports U.S. law enforcement officials discovered old and previously unreported postings as they investigated Malik and her husband Syed Rizwan Farook. Immigration officials don’t usually check social media posts as part of their background checks, according to the newspaper.
Malik’s path to the U.S. immediately highlighted the U.S. government’s immigration vetting practices after she was identified as one of the attackers in San Bernardino, Calif. The Obama administration is reviewing the program, Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson said Monday. He didn’t specify what changes were going to be made.
Johnson said it was too soon to tell if the government missed signs that Malik may have been radicalized before she was approved for her visa.
"That assumes, and this investigation is still under way, that there were flags that were raised or should have been raised in the process of her admission to the United States, and I am not prepared to say that and I'm not prepared to make that declaration," Johnson said.
The K-1 visa program is among the smallest visa categories managed by the government. Of more than 9.9 million visas issued in fiscal 2014, just 35,925 -- roughly 0.3 percent -- were fiance visas, according to State Department figures.
Much of the focus is on rooting out marriage fraud. A couple must prove they have physically seen each other within the past two years, unless meeting in person would violate "strict and long-established customs" or cause an "extreme hardship."
The applicants are subject to a vetting process that includes at least one in-person interview, fingerprints, checks against U.S. terrorist watch lists and reviews family members, travel history and places where a person has lived and worked. Social media include is rarely included.
Foreigners applying from countries recognized as home to Islamic extremists, such as Pakistan, undergo additional scrutiny before the State Department and Homeland Security Department approve permission for a visa. Malik had been living in Pakistan and visiting family in Saudi Arabia before she passed the background check and entered the U.S. in July 2014 with Farook, a U.S. citizen whose family was originally from Pakistan.
In the social media era, it seems impossible that something like a supportive tweet or post would go unnoticed during the vetting process. However, The New York Times reports the screenings are trade-offs as the try to lessen the threat of terrorism while keeping the border open for business and travel.
“We run people against watch lists and that’s how we decided if they get extra screening,” C. Stewart Verdery Jr., a senior Homeland Security official during George W. Bush’s administration, told The Times. “In cases where those lists don’t hit, there’s nothing that distinguishes them from people we would love to welcome to this country.”
Malik was vetted by three separate American agencies before entering the country. First, Homeland Security checked her name against law enforcement and national security databases. Then, her application went through to the State Department, which reviewed her fingerprints against other databases and finally, she applied for a green card and was thoroughly reviewed once more.
U.S. Visa Process Missed San Bernardino Wife’s Zealotry on Social Media
originally posted by: ReadLeader
So, what have we learned from this unfortunate situation? Background eludes to "background" IE, finger prints and criminal history.
Should we unravel every layer of anyones social life, media and on line activities prior to approving background checks?
Had someone cbecked her FB post (s) or atleast reported them (if they were public) perhaps a different turnout would have prevailed.?.
SF
originally posted by: ReadLeader
a reply to: NightSkyeB4Dawn
As an employer, our "new-hires" must undergo background and drug testing. We go a bit futher and investigate thier on-line profile (s) ... This is where we loose 71% of viable candidates... whether is denotes excessive boozing, and other social unacceptable behavior..inappropriate language and "pictures" etc.
Maybe we DO need more thorough "All Inclusive" background checks...
originally posted by: forkedtongue
a reply to: IAMTAT
They have just as much of a right to America as any American does.
If a few dozens of American citizens have to die every year so they can come in too bad.
originally posted by: IAMTAT
originally posted by: forkedtongue
a reply to: IAMTAT
They have just as much of a right to America as any American does.
If a few dozens of American citizens have to die every year so they can come in too bad.
PLUS....they'll vote 70% Democrat.
originally posted by: forkedtongue
a reply to: IAMTAT
They have just as much of a right to America as any American does.
If a few dozens of American citizens have to die every year so they can come in too bad.
Questions for K-1 Visa Applicants
Do you seek to engage in terrorist activities while in the U.S.?
Have you ever/do you intend to provide money/support to any terrorist groups?
Do you have any skills or training in explosives, nuclear,or chemical experience?
Have you ever been a member of, or been involved with a paramilitary unit?
Before refugees face U.S. screening, they must get a referral from the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (or occasionally a U.S. embassy or another NGO). The UN refers about 1 percent of refugees for resettlement through its own vetting process, which takes four to 10 months. During that process, UN officials decide if people actually qualify as refugees, if they require resettlement, and which country would accept them.
Once the cases are passed along to the United States, the refugees undergo security clearances. Their names, biographical information and fingerprints are run through federal terrorism and criminal databases. Meanwhile, the refugees are interviewed by Department of Homeland Security officials. If approved, they then undergo a medical screening, a match with sponsor agencies, "cultural orientation" classes and one final security clearance.
Syrian refugees in particular must clear one additional hurdle. Their documents are placed under extra scrutiny and cross-referenced with classified and unclassified information.
The process typically takes one to two years or longer and happens before a refugee ever gets onto American soil.