Preemptive Nuking to Eliminate the Perpetual Threat

With US/NATO forces bombing up Syria for multiple years (when did first strikes start?!(, yet ISUS activity (suicide bombings, mass shootings in France and US not necessarily respectively) in the West actually increasing in recent weeks/months, and Russia not having eliminated the nuclear resort either..yet not having resorted to themvib the past yet US clearly has.. It's only a matter of time to do it again, no?

The only threat to humanity are the power elite. Those who wish to control humanity behind the scenes, those who manipulate the media, those who keep humanity hooked on oil, stuck on this planet, those who try to obfuscate the truth, those with no vision, no ethics, no intelligence, no creativity, they are the stain on humanity.

We need the oil - dont forget why we are there.

You dont want to contaminate your oilfields now do you?

a reply to: Plantagenet

No.

Nuclear weapons will not be used in Syria. Too much fallout - both literally and figuratively.

originally posted by: deloprator20000
The only threat to humanity are the power elite. Those who wish to control humanity behind the scenes, those who manipulate the media, those who keep humanity hooked on oil, stuck on this planet, those who try to obfuscate the truth, those with no vision, no ethics, no intelligence, no creativity, they are the stain on humanity.

I'm not saying your wrong...BUT there's been war a LOT longer than there's been a 'power elite'.

Just keep that in mind....

a reply to: nwtrucker

You might be right.

a reply to: dr treg

The U.S. doesn't need oil, we have more than enough low population density desert to provide for all our energy needs (through solar power) but, then again, the population really doesn't run the U.S.

a reply to: Plantagenet

A Message concerning Damascus:

“Watch this: Damascus undone as a city,
a pile of dust and rubble!
Her towns emptied of people.
The sheep and goats will move in
And take over the towns
as if they owned them—which they will!
Not a sign of a fort is left in Ephraim,
not a trace of government left in Damascus.
What’s left of Aram?
The same as what’s left of Israel—not much.”

Like others have said, there is too much oil in that region for western powers to nuke syria

a reply to: Plantagenet

Turkey and the NATO alliance aren't giving Putin much of a chance to rid of ISIS. And yes he did disturbingly touch on the topic of Nukes in Syria.

a reply to: infolurker

I fully expect you are right. If the nukes or even a nuke flies in the ME, watch Damascus.

Everytime something happens over there, I cringe at the moment.

a reply to: dukeofjive696969

The oil is underground.

But frankly, the US has plenty of its own reserves.

a reply to: ketsuko

when has that fact ever stopped the US from invading a country to take their oil?

a reply to: ketsuko

The radiation would contaminate most of the middle east, nobody is going to be able to get to the oil.

The EMP from a nuke blast would take out all the broadcast satellites in geostationary orbit over Europe. There would be riots everywhere when the national populations realize they can't watch Eurosport, BabeStation and catch-up TV.

a reply to: dukeofjive696969

I love the whole nuke point of view... just look at the contamination the almost 2,000 nukes we have already exploded have done.... nukes are overrated (unless you're at ground zero) and used as a weapon of fear, and it works well.



Release the Kracken!

a reply to: dukeofjive696969

Where there's a will, there's a way. We can already drill sideways.

a reply to: Volund

Tell that to the people that died from radiation.

a reply to: infolurker

I believe that Isis are expecting to fulfil a prophecy by fighting "Rome" on the plains of Dabiq in Syria.

Insane.

But at least it makes them somewhat predictable.

a reply to: dukeofjive696969

Watch the video, where are all the ones on US soil that died of this radiation? Distracted much?