Porn at camp david!!!! lol

www.newsmax.com.../11/24/195747


It is an old story, but for those of you who do not already know i thought i would post it. This is hilarious porn at camp david.

I wonder if each president adds to the collection while in office? I wonder if they add some pics of the various mistresses? I'll bet there are tons of cool stuff there.

LOL Well hell, it MUST be true then!*sarcasm*

Isn't the National Enquirer or the Globe a more credible site though?

Of course, if Clinton was involved you must have made this whole thing up...I forgot. Thanks for the reminder, romantico.

Clinton couldnt go 5 minutes without having some porn to look at, or someone to screw. Also what president wouldnt want to look at some porn after a hard days work. I am sure presidents can get stressed out a lot so looking at the porn will releave some of that tenssion and stress.

like Faux Entertainment?C'mon! Its like me posting an anti-Bush story & listing the Nation or Bartcop as my source!Newsmax is a right wing news sight that delievers news the people want to hear.Its tabloid news.What other source has ran with this story?ABC NEWS?NBC?CBS?Rueters?Washington Post?La Times?The point is the news site listed is NOT CREDIBLE at all!

You have heard that one right???

You know, that the White House is the largest dealer in childhood sex slavery. Has anyone else heard these claims???

I know they sound silly but think about it for a second before you throw it in the trash. Seriously, what do you think???

Is it possible????

To me any thing is possible.

Not all things possible are explainable though nor are all things possible truthful either. Yet many people such as Arizona Wilder claim just that.

Has anyone read her book???

I have not done so yet. I was wondering if anyone had and if they could give me their opinions on her publication???

The Cabal has a history of indulging in very strange sexual practices... This sort of thing is probably living room table material for some Cabal members...

Originally posted by dragonrider
The Cabal has a history of indulging in very strange sexual practices... This sort of thing is probably living room table material for some Cabal members...

That is obvious. Who can go to Camp David????

Surely not you or I.

Only those in power can.

In fact only those that so-called "Need to be there" can.

What and how that need is based on is hard to consider without speculating. For we don't really know what is going on there. I hear that it is just another place where "They" keep their stash.

That stash being, drugs, weapons, people, whether those people be slaves, prisoners or plotters of the system. Hell for all we know that is where Saddam is. I also have heard that it is just one more way to reach the so-called "Inner earth".

Go ahead, start your crusades now. I welcome the denial of these claims. In fact I expect them. I may not fully believe in them all, but some of it makes sense to me.

[Edited on 13-6-2003 by Abraham Virtue]

romantico, Well, I know its not the NY Times but we do have freedom of the press and they have every right to report the story. You certainly cannot be forced to take it for gospel and niether can I but in your political bias and anxious defense of Bill Clinton, I feel you have overlooked important aspects of the thread. It is a collection of porn which leads me to think it was contributed to by many past administrations as well.

If it would help let the rest of the posters get on with the discussion, we can say that its been everybody but Bill Clinton. He's an angel. Even though he might have had affairs and used a cigar in ways most don't dream of, he doesn't look at porn. So, feel free to continue your policing of the web in defense of the Clintons as we'll exclude him from this one.

Just a side note and helpful hint for romantico...someone else mentioned Bill Clinton on ATS here's a link

www.abovetopsecret.com...


The comment is as follows:

"The Chicago Sun Times reported, two days ago, that he got a very friendly, understanding phone call from someone who sympathized with him....

... It was Bill Clinton. No joke."


Just thought I'd help ya out.

Originally posted by romantico
like Faux Entertainment?C'mon! Its like me posting an anti-Bush story & listing the Nation or Bartcop as my source!Newsmax is a right wing news sight that delievers news the people want to hear.Its tabloid news.What other source has ran with this story?ABC NEWS?NBC?CBS?Rueters?Washington Post?La Times?The point is the news site listed is NOT CREDIBLE at all!

You miss the point of the site, it will cover stories that the mainstream media won't because they don't want certain things known.

But, since your team runs ABC, NBC and CBS, I can see why you want to know if they have covered the story. They are the exact reaons why the rest of us need sites like NewsMax and Matt Drudge.

Originally posted by Thomas Crowne

Originally posted by romantico
like Faux Entertainment?C'mon! Its like me posting an anti-Bush story & listing the Nation or Bartcop as my source!Newsmax is a right wing news sight that delievers news the people want to hear.Its tabloid news.What other source has ran with this story?ABC NEWS?NBC?CBS?Rueters?Washington Post?La Times?The point is the news site listed is NOT CREDIBLE at all!

You miss the point of the site, it will cover stories that the mainstream media won't because they don't want certain things known.

But, since your team runs ABC, NBC and CBS, I can see why you want to know if they have covered the story. They are the exact reaons why the rest of us need sites like NewsMax and Matt Drudge.

It really makes one question which side has something to hide when liberals fight tooth and nail to put down an opposing view on news reporting. If I had a case as solid as liberals do, why would I strive to suppress someone else's freedom to speak, report? Would it not be more progressive to encourage as many points of view as possible..but would it follow well with socialist views ? Freedom of the press only when its convenient for their side of things.

It really reveals how "progressive" they are and how much they advocate free speech.
The biggest joke is how they support free speech - as long as they are the ones speaking. It's similar to their "pro-choice" stance. What they mean is they are pro-abortion. On anything else, there is no choice, only their way.

Oh I see.So Newsmax & Drudge is actually "The Real News"& all the others are liberal media BS, afraid to report the truth.

This really is a conspiracy site isn't it?

Well, gotta go find out whats going on in the world,gonna read the STAR & THE NY POST Then maybe I'll watch the FAUX Entertainment news channel! GIMMIE A BREAK!
Do you actually believe this BS you spew or are you just pulling my leg?

A fair news site? Give me an example.Has NewsMAx ever reported a Pro-liberal story?Its all "Conservatives Good, Liberals bad"mentality! We do not live in a black & white world.There are crooked Liberals & croooked Conservatives.Newsmax is a humor siite catered to the right!Okay, if Newsmax is a honest site that reports the truth as you claim,then here are some sites that also report the truth.

www.rightwingslayer.com...
www.bartcop.com...
www.smudgereport.com...
www.buzzflash.com...

these are no more truthful sites than Newsmax & Drudge,but because they report on issues that YOU believe are true,then you dismiss everyone else who doesn't subscibe to your views.Otherwise, "Your ontop of things & You know the truth"& poor souls like me are in the dark & mis-informed!Yeah, riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight! Its impossible to have a sensible conversation with such simple minded folks!I'm not as liberal as you claim I am.I also have some VERY conservative idias as well that I'm sure we'd agree on.(against abortion,pro-death penality,etc but I still call myself a borderline liberal/moderate,so don't make this out to be a Rightwing vs.Left wing kind of thing)Its about being fair.Are all the sites I listed considered liberal to you?

Please note,I didn't list the NY Times & yet you still insist the news sites I list are biased.Most have never heard of NewsMax & most Americans would laugh at such a site.Even staunch republicans would admit its a right leaning site.

Give me a list of news sites you consider to be fair.I'm really curious to see this!

No, you flippant little naive, follow me, pay attention and do not read into or out of what I say.

The media controlled by "them" runs only the stories that they want to, that which supports and furthers their social reengineering cause. Sure, at times they flat out lie and misrepresent, but so which ones don't? The point is, if you want to read the stories they will not print as it does not fit their agenda, you must go to alternative sites, and NewsMax is one. Matt is a good guy for getting buried but important stories.

Is that clear enough, you word-twisting, trouble-making imp?

Can you back this up?I mean, how did you stumble onto this revelation?Did God speak to you or something?Tell me,howcome only a selct few no this secret? You really believe this to be credible?

This works both ways.Leftist sites & right wing sites.Both are extreme sites that lean towards a certain agenda.Truth?Maybe hints of it sometimes,but c'mon!Maybe you need to see the world outside a conspiracy site alittle more often!

What, is your head in the sand or up your fifth point of contact? Prove it to you? Next you'll want me to be proving to you that the sun shines on the earth and that the rain falls down. Get real, this is not some new revelation. What, have you not even heard of the Tom Brokaw deal?

Yeah, thats what I thought!

Guess we should just take you on your word & shut up!

I can't keep from laughing! Well, is the weekly world news daily considered a legit news source?(The aliens just met with the President last week) Or how about the National Enquirer.Are they in on the big secret as well?

My sides are hurting from laughing so hard!

Originally posted by romantico
I also have some VERY conservative idias as well that I'm sure we'd agree on.(against abortion

I view this as more of a human idea than conservative one. I think its sad that the life of innocent children have been reduced to a political tool for the pupose of relieving us of our humanitarian responsibilities.