It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: chuck258
You know what the primary difference is? Radical Christians are about ten thousand times less likely to commit an actual terroristic act such as suicide bombing, kidnapping and beheading, cutting open the stomachs of those who have been wounded by a grenade they just threw, blowing up Muslim embassies, etc.
More so, the moderate portion of Christianity is far less supportive of it's radical portions than the moderate portions of Islam are to it's extreme elements.
Yeah, this guy is full of unabridged hatred and spews ridiculous anti-whatever he doesn't like rhetoric, but AFAIK, he hasn't incited Christians into walking into a Mosque and opening fire, or told them to get on a plane and go blow up some Muslim Holy sites. So far he is just stating some things he believes, as is his right, just as it is CAIR's right to cry and moan about the supposed discrimination Muslim's face. Its up to them to prove their point of view, and us to cal them bout out on it as to why they are wrong.
To sum: You are comparing the most significant radical Christians to the most significant radical Muslims and their is no contest. The largest extent of radical Christians is basically speaking their mind in church as to why they think Christians are discriminated against and stating what they believe to be no coincidence that a "Satan Worshiping metal band" (or something equally ridiculous) was targeted and killed in a terrorist attack.
The most radical Muslims on the other hand are in positions of true power, sometimes even in an influential governmental position (Iran's head imam for example) they openly advocate for the genocide of Jews, have influence and control over established terrorist groups, and actively tell their members to go out and kill infidels, westerners, etc. They have a large following that is more than willing to carry out attacks on their behalf, and their head leaders (of Muslim radicals) openly and actively support those actions and do not condemn them.
Apples to oranges. You can't compare Christian radicals and Muslim radicals in this manner because the radical elements of Islam are many times closer to the average Muslim than the radical Christians are to the average Christian.
How often do conservatives blast moderate Muslims for the popular perception that they're "not doing enough to denounce radical Islam?" How ironic (and concerning, not to mention hypocritical) is it then that the same people refuse to acknowledge let alone denounce Christian extremists in their own backyard — in their own political party?
originally posted by: BuzzyWigs
a reply to: TheBulk
It's not stupid crap - to hear a community leader calling for the death penalty, sir, is not the same as some kid on the playground making fun of a chubby, clumsy classmate.
And it's doubly troubling that three men running for president SUPPORT HIM.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: theantediluvian
Ideologically, the distance between radical Christianity and radical Islam is actually a lot smaller than people are comfortable admitting. I wonder if the biggest difference between the two isn't simply that radical Muslims fundamentalist like those in ISIS rely on terrorists to incite the holy war they both want and radical Christian fundamentalist are counting on lobbyists in our government to accomplish the same.
This highlights EXACTLY where people are going to attack your thread with their rationalizations. You see because Christians aren't actively blowing people up it's ok (or tolerable) to preach extremist philosophy. Never mind that lobbying government can cause FAR more damage than a sole terrorist attack could ever accomplish. I imagine you are going to be stuck explaining this distinction to quite a few Christians in this thread. That is if they decide to even respond to your thread that is.
Though at the end of the day, it's just a rationalization. It's the same thing as Muslim extremism, just different clothing.
originally posted by: dukeofjive696969
And the excuses keep on coming, when your president says god bless america before they go bomb more muslims, and that the body count is really one sided, man people will say anythin to prove there right...
originally posted by: knoxie
a reply to: ManBehindTheMask
this is good to hear.
but, why aren't the young conservatives Christians (who don't believe lbgt should be rounded up and jailed) speaking out when THREE of your presidential candidates attended this rally?
originally posted by: MystikMushroom
a reply to: theantediluvian
What's scary are the people I've met that believe in the "rapture" as described in those "Left Behind" books, and want to actively see it become reality in their lifetime. Donating money, voting for certain people, ect...
3 Dead After Gunman Opens Fire Inside Colorado Planned Parenthood
One officer and two civilians were killed, and 9 others were injured, during a lengthy standoff.
- A gunman is in custody after an hours-long standoff with police inside a Colorado Planned Parenthood.
- He has been identified as Robert Lewis Dear.
- One officer and two civilians were killed in the attack.
- Police convinced the gunman to surrender.
COLORADO SPRINGS, Colo. -- Authorities took a gunman into custody Friday afternoon after an hours-long standoff inside a Planned Parenthood clinic in Colorado Springs, Colorado, that left three people dead and nine others injured. One police officer and two civilians were killed, police spokeswoman Lt. Catherine Buckley confirmed. The officer who died was Garrett Swasey, 44, a six-year veteran of the University of Colorado Colorado Springs police department, the school said. Nine others -- five officers and four civilians -- were shot and are in good condition. The Associated Press and other outlets identified the gunman as Robert Lewis Dear, citing law enforcement sources.
"We don't yet know the full circumstances and motives behind this criminal action, and we don't yet know if Planned Parenthood was in fact the target of this attack. We share the concerns of many Americans that extremists are creating a poisonous environment that feeds domestic terrorism in this country. We will never back away from providing care in a safe, supportive environment that millions of people rely on and trust," the statement continued.
“There’s certainly a providential irony here,” Swanson said of the fact that California rock band Eagles of Death Metal reportedly played “Kiss the Devil” as terrorists began firing AK-47s into the crowd. “They went from singing about the devil to meeting the devil face-to-face.” “When you get a wake-up call like what happened at France’s 9/11 last Friday night at the concert,” he said, “I think we all need to pay attention to what’s happening: This is a message from God. God is shooting a shot across the bow and we better be paying attention to this.”
originally posted by: LadyGreenEyes
a reply to: theantediluvian
Your title is beyond misleading, and what you claim he said isn't even what he said in the quote you provided.
“There’s certainly a providential irony here,” Swanson said of the fact that California rock band Eagles of Death Metal reportedly played “Kiss the Devil” as terrorists began firing AK-47s into the crowd. “They went from singing about the devil to meeting the devil face-to-face.” “When you get a wake-up call like what happened at France’s 9/11 last Friday night at the concert,” he said, “I think we all need to pay attention to what’s happening: This is a message from God. God is shooting a shot across the bow and we better be paying attention to this.”
Where, exactly, in that does he state that anyone was a "devil-worshiper"? He stated that it was ironic that a song about the devil was purported to be playing when the people were killed. That isn't calling anyone a devil worshiper.
The Christian bashing is certainly in full swing lately.
“These ISIS devil-worshippers have pitted themselves against humanist devil-worshippers. I’m not on either side here. I’m not taking the side of the devil-worshippers performing the concert; I’m not on the side of ISIS who are slaughtering the devil-worshippers inside the concert. I’m not on neither side.”
originally posted by: MystikMushroom
If group A rounds people up and executes them, but group B makes their lifestyle illegal and puts them all in prison -- is there much of a difference in the end result?
originally posted by: AnonymousMoose
radical christianity isn't shooting people and setting off bombs in public places...they're just a bunch of a-holes