It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Exactly it's not worth it! as Planet X has been proven to be real no questions, so why pursue Me anymore and troll My comments incessantly as has been the case the whole time I've been here.
Actually well done you propelled me to get out there and prove Planet X is real, so thanks on behalf of all the gang!
I realised it was a reflection straight away as it was moving along with the ISS so hence it could not have been something outside the ISS.
originally posted by: restless genius
a reply to: tsurfer2000h
Forget Nibiru the Destroyer, we now have Nibiru the Stalker.
originally posted by: Jennyfrenzy
originally posted by: restless genius
a reply to: tsurfer2000h
Forget Nibiru the Destroyer, we now have Nibiru the Stalker.
Niburu the Stalker is also equipped with such advanced cloaking technology that it can only be seen from the ISS and not earth. Pretty wild stuff
This picture is an obvious hoax. But claiming that amateur astronomers should be able to see any large planets, or brown dwarf within the solar system is also false. Not all brown dwarfs are that hot that they can be easily seen. There are brown dwarves that are as warm as the human body, and are incredibly hard to detect.
No new planet is that close to Earth. But according to calculations, and what the evidence shows there are at least 2 objects/planet and something larger within the Oort cloud which puts such objects inside the solar system.
as Planet X has been proven to be real no questions, so why pursue Me anymore and troll My comments incessantly as has been the case the whole time I've been here.
Actually well done you propelled me to get out there and prove Planet X is real
so thanks on behalf of all the gang!
But claiming that amateur astronomers should be able to see any large planets, or brown dwarf within the solar system is also false.
Not all brown dwarfs are that hot that they can be easily seen.
There are brown dwarves that are as warm as the human body, and are incredibly hard to detect.
originally posted by: InhaleExhale
Yes, if its a brown dwarf and in our solar system just about everybody with the ability to look up would see it without the need of any device other than their eyes.
originally posted by: InhaleExhale
True, but you do know of amazing phenomena known as 'reflection'?
originally posted by: InhaleExhale
Do you know how you see any part of your own or anothers human body?
originally posted by: InhaleExhale
...
Because it would be reflecting the suns light.
originally posted by: InhaleExhale
...
So I can understand that some might have trouble understanding what a reflection of light is.
originally posted by: EndOfDays77
I just want to share some observations and correlations I have made between the objects captured in the ISS image,My own images and a LASCO/SOHO image.
Here's the thread I've been updating over the year noting the observations (images).www.abovetopsecret.com...
The winged orb is now quite familiar, if you've followed the thread. I initially noticed this form in what I believe to be the main object, over time, the winged form has now appeared in the other objects (moons of PX) that have also appeared at times.
There are two objects I want to pay the most focus on in the ISS image. They are both winged orbs, but due to their positioning in My images and that of the ISS and SOHO, I know that one is the main object and the other an orbital.
I'll post My own images of a 'winged orb' first, so you can tune in to what I'm saying and showing.
When I saw the ISS photo I was flabbergasted! Think about this? The ISS image bears stark resemblance to my images, the only ones of their kind I know to exist, as many PX images are obvious second Suns and not (at times) subtle smaller 'winged' objects as I have seen. What are the chances of two objects appearing in the ISS video that bear exact resemblance to the images I have captured on the ground of PX?! Also add to this the SOHO comparison. To Me this is game set and match for PX research. One last point I want to make. I am normally an advocate of Zetatalk but their explanation has made me question their agenda, which I believe now to be a controlled opposition to trick people at the last moment. The only reason ZT would claim this ISS image is not PX, is because it would suggest it's passing will be sooner than we think, the primary object in my images has increased many fold in size since April, so at this rate it will be huge soon, and I'm still taking images at any chance btw (keep an eye out for updates). An early passing of PX is now my stance and matches the EQ pattern that is suggesting Poleshift could be in May next year (follow Terral03 for the EQ thing). So, back to ZT, they claim this ISS image is a "glob", this is utter nonsense when you compare the images, so imo ZT has outed itself as part of the deception, very clever mind! Because they are 80-90% accurate and correct, and I still would advise people to become familiar with the info, it's just that you need to know their PS timing is probably a lie, and add to this, their safe location advice may be underestimated, so stay vigilant! BTW we will have a PX,Sun and Earth alignment *forecast for December 1st* it may not be this day exactly, perhaps very near after,or even before, you will know when it happens it will be a massive event, I predict the US will possibly get hit on this alignment, as the pressure has converged around the Pacific meeting on the West Coast, a heads up for you good Folks there!
Stay well ATS!!
Example of the winged orb as seen from Earth, this is what I am comparing to the object at 10 o'clock (from the main object) in the ISS image:
Here's the ISS image. One is a render I made to explain what I am seeing,another is an original,and the other an invert. I want you to pay close attention to the winged orb *in close at the 10 o'clock position from the main object*. Hold this image in your mind, or even scroll up and down to compare it to other images I will add. Also hold the form of the main (largest) object in mind too.
ISS Image-original,render,invert:
Here's but one of hundreds of SOHO images of PX. In this image I can pick out the smaller winged object as well that matches the ISS image, It is *also in the 'tail' of the main object*. I know the images of my own above are 'tail' objects due to their position on the out skirts of the two o'clock position and other outer areas around the sun.
SOHO/LASCO image,Unzoomed and zoomed:
Here's a more recent photo session, and possibly one of the most revealing, certainly it was unique! as I had never seen 3 clusters of objects. The middle orb looks good to be the main object due to positioning and color and shape, and the top and bottom cluster I must assume are orbitals.I provided a sequence of these images in the thread, covering the hour I was imaging and observing them. Also take these images in mind when imagining and comparing the formation of what is a mini solar system.
Three tiered clusters of objects depicting the mini solar system:
This last image I was reluctant to add to My thread, in fact I wasn't going to, until I saw the ISS image that is! I usually like to provide the clearest representation of what I am seeing, and this image didn't quite stand out in the images enough for my liking. Again I saw this by naked eye, at the usual time, in the usual place (for the main object), displaying a somewhat familiar variation of the winged orb. This was a very,very subtle sighting of PX, what I call a 'projection' (aura) of the solid object. This form, from what I have learned, is caused by light refraction through the atmosphere and also the dust/debris cloud shrouding PX must also play it's part. I had issues with photo clarity on FB but I think it should be ok here. I've again made a render detailing exactly what I saw and to help tune the viewer into the image. In the render you can see the red orb, this is the 'projection' of the object, within this is a white orb, this seems to be the solid form of the object. The squiggly white line is the debris 'trail'. I present this now as it bears resemblance to the ISS image of the main object, especially the winding 'trail'. This may not be the most convincing to some, but I should have enough reputation here after the other collection of photos and accounts I have made over the past year. Of coarse I have been through the usual process of elimaination just to preempt any debunking attempts. These objects are provably real as I have outlined over time
Example I am comparing to main ISS object, for greatest clarity and understanding, zoom in on the last image (original) the others have slightly compressed:
originally posted by: tsurfer2000h
a reply to: Eagleyedobserver
So now let me help you out a little bit.
Do you understand you wouldn't have made this thread if something such as Nibiru were close enough to be seen by the ISS?