It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Amid the wave of Islamophobia stemming from last week’s terrorist attacks in Paris, Muslims in the United States are being offered solace from an unlikely source: satanists.
At least two chapters of the Satanic Temple announced this week that its members would be happy to help any Muslims made uncomfortable by the recent surge in anti-Islamic sentiment.
“If there is anyone in the San Jose region who is Muslim and afraid to leave their home out of fear for some kind of backlash, don’t hesitate to reach out to us. We would be glad to escort you where you need to go without advertising our presence — just big dudes walking you where you need to be. We would also happily deliver you some groceries,” the San Jose chapter of the Satanic Temple advertised on its Facebook page Wednesday.
Within a day, the Minneapolis-St. Paul chapter of the temple extended a hand as well.
“Our offer to the Muslims of the Twin Cities comes from a place of genuine compassion for our fellow human beings. It’s not to ride the tide of sentiment or capitalize on people for further name recognition. Let us know if you or someone you know need the sort of assistance we are offering,” the group said. [WashingtonTimes]
While the Republican front-runners for president amp up their anti-Muslim rhetoric, the Satanic Temple is offering help to any Muslim feeling threatened in the wake of the recent Paris attacks.
Donald Trump has called for Muslims to be registered in a data-base, while Ben Carson has called for the screening of Syrian refugees because they might be 'rabid dogs.'
Senator Ted Cruz called for legislation to ban the Muslim Syrian refugees while allowing the Christian ones entry.
Former Florida governor Jeb Bush meanwhile called for America to welcome Christian Syrians, saying "We should focus our efforts as it relates to the refugees for the Christians that are being slaughtered."
All of these men proclaim their deep Christian values.
“This is also extended to Sikhs as many of the ignorant and hateful do not understand the difference,” the San Jose chapter said.
It’s worth noting that these sorts of “satanic” groups aren’t typically worshippers of satan, they’re usually just mocking those who are trying to force their religion into places it doesn’t belong.
Like in Oklahoma where these “satanists” raised money to erect a statue of Lucifer in response to the conservative attempt to place a Ten Commandments monument on government property. You know, in the name of “religious equality” and all.
They’ve also taken to shielding women from Republican attempts to infringe upon their right to have control over their own bodies. But it’s telling of the vile nature of many of these “Christian conservatives” when a group that openly mocks religion seems to know more about “Christian values” (or basic human decency) than these hypocrites who claim to be devout Christians while lacking any semblance of real Christian values.
Read more at: www.forwardprogressives.com...
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: ~Lucidity
My remark stands. These Satanists are still making all kinds of assumptions.
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: ~Lucidity
1. The only possible reason to object is purely on a religious strife basis.
2. Only the "right wing" is objecting.
3. Muslims would appreciate the support of Satanists, even tangentially (similar religious cosmology to Christians).
4. Anyone is objecting in this case to Muslims who are already here, only those coming under a specific refugee program.
But please go on with your fantasy that the Satanists aren't making some colossal assumptions about where all of this is motivated from, who is behind it, and what it's reasoning is.
originally posted by: beansidhe
Whilst I agree with what they are offering, which is really what any decent, normal person would offer -a helping hand -, is there maybe not a wee bit of sneaky one-upmanship going on here?