It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Destinyone
Asen_y2k,
Thank you for your efforts in keeping us updated on this terrible situation in Mali. Your well presented, up to date information continues to show, why you are valuable asset to ATS.
Des
The US Department of Defense has told the BBC that two Americans has been involved in the operation to end the hostage situation in Mali's capital, Bamako. One was from US Special Operations and was on a temporary assignment to the US embassy in Bamako. He assisted at the hotel, but was not part of the raid. Department of Defense officials stress that he was not on an assignment to help with the hotel situation, but got involved when he realized what was taking place. A second Department of Defense staffer was in a US-Mali Joint Operations Centre "offering advice" as the situation unfolded. All officials have been accounted for.
originally posted by: Flyingclaydisk
On a related note; I find this very telling...
Here is a news story from CNN. Notice there is absolutely no mention of the terrorists yelling "Allahu Ahkbar", or the word "terrorist"...or the fact that 'al quaeda' linked groups have claimed responsibility. In fact there is no mention of extremist Islam having anything to do with this attack.
Mali Siege
Seems to illustrate some serious bias in news coverage!
originally posted by: Flyingclaydisk
a reply to: asen_y2k
No, no...I was only referring to CNN, not other news agencies which, as you correctly point out, have these points clearly called out.
originally posted by: asen_y2k
originally posted by: Flyingclaydisk
a reply to: asen_y2k
No, no...I was only referring to CNN, not other news agencies which, as you correctly point out, have these points clearly called out.
Ah, thanks for pointing it out again. I missed it in your first post. It is indeed wierd, maybe they are being politically correct.
originally posted by: laminatedsoul
originally posted by: asen_y2k
originally posted by: Flyingclaydisk
a reply to: asen_y2k
No, no...I was only referring to CNN, not other news agencies which, as you correctly point out, have these points clearly called out.
Ah, thanks for pointing it out again. I missed it in your first post. It is indeed wierd, maybe they are being politically correct.
I'd say that's it exactly. They don't want to bring on more anti-whatever hysteria. But the problem is, not reporting all the facts, will lead to a state where, say, a crime is committed and the reports state that the perpetrator was a human, of average height, undisclosed gender, approximately between the age of 15 and 80, seen wearing clothing and driving a car
Mali's security ministry has told Reuters that gunmen are still holding out in the hotel they attacked early this morning: "The attackers no longer have hostages. They are dug in in the upper floors. They are alone with the Malian special forces who are trying to dislodge them," spokesman Amadou Sangho said.
originally posted by: Flyingclaydisk
a reply to: asen_y2k
Yes, but it illustrates how agenda driven CNN is and it clearly diminishes their legitimacy as a professional 'news' source. Fox is no different, just at the other end of the political spectrum.
Heck, Al Jazeera is less biased than CNN / Fox...and that's a pretty stark message!
originally posted by: ecapsretuo
“It’s happening on the seventh floor, the jihadists are now shooting in the corridor,” the security source also said.
Seems to be awkward and deliberate wording, considering the event is still happening, upstairs, and this guy has declared to the world this is an act of "Jihadists."
The immediate implication then, is that the act is being done in the name of Muslims.
Well then, what "terrorists" are in West Africa?
The French have been fighting Boko Harem in Northern Mali this year.
Conveniently, Boko Harem is al Quaida affiliated, "declared allegiance to" ISIS in March, and
An investigation into Boko Haram by the Greenwhite Coalition revealed that the “Boko Haram campaign is a covert operation organized by the American Central Intelligence Agency, CIA and coordinated by the American Embassy in Nigeria.”
The U.S has used its embassy for covert operations before. The one in Benghazi was proven to be a base for a covert gun-running operation to arm the mercenaries fighting against Bashar Al-Assad in Syria.
www.globalresearch.ca...
This event, i think will be yet another incentive for France to enter more deeply NATO's "global war on terror", on the latest front, territories in Africa most crucial to NWO corporate imperialism.
Last August, President Obama authorized the Pentagon to send France $10 million to help pay for troop transport and aerial refueling.
“There’s already an unprecedented degree of coordination, with both the U.S. and France bringing complementary strengths to the table,” said Michael R. Shurkin, a former Central Intelligence Agency analyst who is now at the RAND Corporation.
“The more the U.S. and France work together, the greater the regional alliance’s chance of success.”
says CIA/RAND guy
originally posted by: Flyingclaydisk
On a related note; I find this very telling...
Here is a news story from CNN. Notice there is absolutely no mention of the terrorists yelling "Allahu Ahkbar", or the word "terrorist"...or the fact that 'al quaeda' linked groups have claimed responsibility. In fact there is no mention of extremist Islam having anything to do with this attack.
Mali Siege
Seems to illustrate some serious bias in news coverage!
CNN reporter suspended after tweet on refugees
CNN global affairs correspondent Elise Labott has been suspended for two weeks, a source at CNN confirmed to POLITICO.
Earlier on Thursday Labott had tweeted about the House voting on a bill that would make it harder for Syrian refugees to enter the United States.
"House passes bill that could limit Syrian refugees. Statue of Liberty bows head in anguish," she wrote, linking to a CNN article on the vote.
Several critics, including the Washington Post's Erik Wemple, said the tweet showed bias.