It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Ove38
originally posted by: Ectospasm
How many of you have read the Quran?
I have, the writers have no respect for God and Jesus Christ.
originally posted by: CharlieSpeirs
A lot of people on ATS talk like they've read it.
Like they can comprehend it.
I'm suspicious of that.
These things don't exist in a vacuum on their own. They are borne from the same ideologies, many of which are sourced in the Quran and Hadith.
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: projectvxn
These things don't exist in a vacuum on their own. They are borne from the same ideologies, many of which are sourced in the Quran and Hadith.
In China and India their cultures have women subservient, too. They are Budhist and Hindu, not Muslim.
Men are stronger so they take advantage, whatever culture, ethnicity or geographic location.
You got girls in your ship, PJ?
Apostasy punishable by death, hatred and murder of homosexuals, subservient women, and intolerance toward other cultures and general approval of terrorist groups like Al Qaeda.
The focus here is on the topic of Islam, particularly the Quran.
Apostasy punishable by death, hatred and murder of homosexuals, subservient women, and intolerance toward other cultures and general approval of terrorist groups like Al Qaeda.
originally posted by: Iamthatbish
It's very difficult to read the Qur'an. Your best bet would be to go to a sit that have both Arabic and English translation together.
I found it to be very repetitive. Like a song with the same verse again and again and again.
originally posted by: CharlieSpeirs
A lot of people on ATS talk like they've read it.
Like they can comprehend it.
I'm suspicious of that.
Tbh I could go my whole life not wanting anyone but paedos beheaded...
I'm satisfied with live and let live... As my signature alludes to.
Those are Hadith ideologies...
If those were in the Quran I wouldn't have converted.
So we differ, because I do have a problem with those books (Hadith)...
I think they're a mixture of psychopathy and outright satirical garbage.
Polling whether one would prefer Sharia is not the same as polling whether it should be forced on a population.
originally posted by: projectvxn
a reply to: intrptr
Argue with the results of how Middle Eastern conservative Muslims view their own faith. This faith is derived not just from literal interpretations of the Quran, but of subsequent texts such as the Hadith.
The Quran contains at least 109 verses that call Muslims to war with nonbelievers for the sake of Islamic rule. Some are quite graphic, with commands to chop off heads and fingers and kill infidels wherever they may be hiding. Muslims who do not join the fight are called 'hypocrites' and warned that Allah will send them to Hell if they do not join the slaughter. Unlike nearly all of the Old Testament verses of violence, the verses of violence in the Quran are mostly open-ended, meaning that they are not restrained by the historical context of the surrounding text. They are part of the eternal, unchanging word of Allah, and just as relevant or subject to interpretation as anything else in the Quran.
Subsequent misinterpretations of texts from Antiquity is the problem, I agree. Of all texts.
This should give us a pretty clear idea of just how conservative the Islamic population of the world really is. It is this Fundamentalism that gives birth to Islamic Terrorism as the word of God is to be taken absolutely literally.
This may not be all Muslims of all sects, but it should be noted that they are the vast majority. No Western Power will ever change this. The culture must change itself over time. Our mistake as "progressive" liberal societies is to think we share political, ideological, and cultural similarities, we do not. That we can force such a conservative and religious society to conform to our ideals. We can't.
originally posted by: Ectospasm
I am curious. I have not read it myself, but I am thinking about giving it a go. It seems to me that unless someone has read the book there is really no sensible basis on which it can be judged.
Many of the posts are vilifying the religion and citing this as the cause rather than understanding complex social, historical, political economic and regional factors that all have an effect when it comes to influencing people to commit acts of brutality.
originally posted by: CharlieSpeirs
Obviously that gets fearmongered into "they want to behead infidels"...
Tbh I could go my whole life not wanting anyone but paedos beheaded...
I'm satisfied with live and let live... As my signature alludes to.
originally posted by: projectvxn
In one word:
Politics