It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Paris attacks predicted in January cover of The Economist

page: 2
3
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 15 2015 @ 03:46 PM
link   
a reply to: NihilistSanta
See the post above yours. It directly addresses the claims of that article.



posted on Nov, 15 2015 @ 03:49 PM
link   

originally posted by: socketdude
a reply to: OhOkYeah

I think you're clutching at straws a little bit.



As is 99% of the content on this website. There are many websites to post content on, this website is one meant for "clutching at straws"
edit on 15-11-2015 by OhOkYeah because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 15 2015 @ 03:50 PM
link   
a reply to: OhOkYeah

No. Not that much.
But you think a lot of people clutching lends credibility?



posted on Nov, 15 2015 @ 03:52 PM
link   

originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: OhOkYeah

www.tradingeconomics.com...

You can set the graph by date. It was 11.5% August-November of 2014, then dropped a little and was 11.3% in January.


Cool. Thanks!



posted on Nov, 15 2015 @ 03:52 PM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
A January article about the cover art.


Daniel Franklin says: “The arrows are taken from the graphic illustrating the story of China’s economy “The numbers to watch” and are Chinese ‘targets’. As it happens, the numbers on the graphic were adjusted in the fact-checking process after the cover went to press.”

yournewswire.com...

Daniel Franklin, btw, is the editor of Economist. So, as pointed out, the actual content of the issue may be more indicative of the "meaning" than silly speculation about shuffling numbers on the cover art.


Pretty well settles it. Every element in the picture relates to an article in that issue of the magazine.

No predictions. No conspiracy. Only ATS speculation. Thanks, Phage. Again.



posted on Nov, 15 2015 @ 03:52 PM
link   
a reply to: OhOkYeah

an arrow also is an indication of direction



posted on Nov, 15 2015 @ 03:53 PM
link   

originally posted by: OhOkYeah
this website is one meant for "clutching at straws"


The motto of the site is "deny ignorance"

You came with a theory which has since been disproved.

It's OK

edit on 15-11-2015 by liqua because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 15 2015 @ 03:56 PM
link   

originally posted by: schuyler

originally posted by: Phage
A January article about the cover art.


Daniel Franklin says: “The arrows are taken from the graphic illustrating the story of China’s economy “The numbers to watch” and are Chinese ‘targets’. As it happens, the numbers on the graphic were adjusted in the fact-checking process after the cover went to press.”

yournewswire.com...

Daniel Franklin, btw, is the editor of Economist. So, as pointed out, the actual content of the issue may be more indicative of the "meaning" than silly speculation about shuffling numbers on the cover art.


Pretty well settles it. Every element in the picture relates to an article in that issue of the magazine.

No predictions. No conspiracy. Only ATS speculation. Thanks, Phage. Again.


Of course it all has a face value meaning. Why wouldn't it?

Still can't find a source for the claim that "“The arrows are taken from the graphic illustrating the story of China’s economy “The numbers to watch” and are Chinese ‘targets’."



posted on Nov, 15 2015 @ 03:57 PM
link   
a reply to: OhOkYeah




Still can't find a source for the claim that "“The arrows are taken from the graphic illustrating the story of China’s economy “The numbers to watch” and are Chinese ‘targets’."

The source is the editor of the magazine. If you want to disprove it, go ahead and get a copy. Show us that the graphic is not from that article.



posted on Nov, 15 2015 @ 04:00 PM
link   

originally posted by: liqua

originally posted by: OhOkYeah
this website is one meant for "clutching at straws"


The motto of the site is "deny ignorance"

You came with a theory which has since been disproved.

It's OK


Yes it is. I've gotten 2 response in this thread with credible information, thankfully.

Neither were yours, though.



posted on Nov, 15 2015 @ 04:01 PM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: OhOkYeah




Still can't find a source for the claim that "“The arrows are taken from the graphic illustrating the story of China’s economy “The numbers to watch” and are Chinese ‘targets’."

The source is the editor of the magazine. If you want to disprove it, go ahead and get a copy. Show us that the graphic is not from that article.


Working on it. I can't find it online but there is a copy at my local library. Will have to check it out when I go over there in a couple of days.



posted on Nov, 15 2015 @ 04:06 PM
link   
a reply to: OhOkYeah

I know what the two arrows mean, something I been saying for years.

The Arabs are the new Indians or more precisely, Native Americans, in terms of how they were murder fodder for the European Americans in the American west.

In this case the Arabs are the NWOS' Indians who are being, and will be, like the native Americas were, slaughtered in the millions.





edit on 15-11-2015 by Willtell because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 15 2015 @ 04:07 PM
link   
a reply to: OhOkYeah
There's an app for that.
www.economist.com...

Also available here:
www.amazon.co.uk...
edit on 11/15/2015 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 15 2015 @ 04:11 PM
link   
Yeah lets disregard the rest of the pic rearrange some numbers that alteady have a meaning in the pic then say oh it has a painting.
Yeah.... Not buying it, reason: Logic.



posted on Nov, 15 2015 @ 04:13 PM
link   
a reply to: OhOkYeah

Another thing is that the French guys head is right under the 2015 like its being highlighted.

If this is legit (I know VT is kind of Alex Jonesian so we got to be careful) it seems to be eerily predictive.



posted on Nov, 15 2015 @ 04:15 PM
link   
My personal take, and I said it back in January.

Those numbers are reference to magnitude to an earthquake.

MR



posted on Nov, 15 2015 @ 04:27 PM
link   
The guy has a good point

The Arrows, imo, are talking esoterically that the Arabs (are the new Indians) The Arrows are going into the dirt

Arrows= Indians=Arabs

Dirt=Death

Also…The Arrows point( in the picture) straight to the Indian leader!

We think of Native Americans as Indians!


Just because the numbers are indicative of something mundane doesn’t in the least take away the significance of this prediction particularly with the French Presidents head right under the 2015



posted on Nov, 15 2015 @ 05:04 PM
link   
a reply to: Rosinitiate

Well, interestingly enough.. I had laid out a bunch of coins in a pattern very similar to the Eiffel Tower just a day prior to this happening.

Not saying this was anything particularly meaningful, just a somewhat creepy coincidence..

Don't know about the 'coincidence' of this topic.. but I'm open to the possibility that this was a false flag, especially since it happened on friday the 13th. They love their cryptic dates.. and they love hinting at what they're going to do. They're trying to abide by their occult standards of conduct.

I bet you they are already grooming future leaders for the far right in Europe. One trip to the underground base for some MK-Ultra grooming.. tape them having sex with children and then wipe their memories. To me it would be a huge wonder.. if that technology hadn't been terribly(and I really do mean terrible, needles under the nails torture terrible) abused for some 60 odd years already..

In 10 years they'll be exactly where they need to be.. can you see it? Ratchet up the chaos another notch.. this is gonna be a bumpy ride.



posted on Nov, 15 2015 @ 05:06 PM
link   
a reply to: Willtell




Just because the numbers are indicative of something mundane doesn’t in the least take away the significance of this prediction particularly with the French Presidents head right under the 2015

No prediction.
The graphic was taken from an article, within the magazine, about China's economic plans. Probably likening them to throwing darts.

edit on 11/15/2015 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 15 2015 @ 05:30 PM
link   
Why do people premise their position with "so if we just jumble all these things around, it supports my point of view." I'll never understand that.

If we jumble them around less than what is needed for the OP, we see 5.11 which is a tactical equipment company in the US, and 3.11 which could be 311, which is a band.

Clearly, what is predicted is that the band will go on tour wearing tactical gear.




new topics




 
3
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join