It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: trifecta
I know EXACTLY what it is. I'm sure it's full of carbon and DNA.
The metallic balls are just a straw man patsy to debunk and misinform. To throw you off the scent. The pluming added to one of them was done deliberately, after the handlers swooped in.
The black, sinuous spheres are the real McCoy. When a person proficient in cleansing their chakras (energy centers) of parasites caused by Archonic plasma entities, they can collect a portion of the parasites into their energetic Third Eye manifestation and project the foreign bodies abroad. One exercise used in conjunction is Sun Gazing projection, the other as far as I am aware is through the static discharge of Plasma entities that are abundant in the atmosphere. Either way this is the result of what one looks like after it is cooked to a crisp. The chimeric, wasps nest appearance of the eyeball shape is a reflection of entangled entities at the moment of catalysis between plasma fusion and the plasmodium eukaryote.
Here's another picture of one:
The spiral in the center is actually the lens of the 3rd eye projection.
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: theantediluvian
Well, it certainly seems that the hydrazine storage tank theory is the one with the most legs, but these things seem to be falling to earth very much intact, if not in working order. I might be wise if future designs ensure a shape which is more prone to breaking up on contact with the atmosphere, because if a ball that size hits someone or something from orbit, it's going to smash whatever it hits to bloody ruin.
It is amazing to me that these things survived re entry, although I suppose being spherical in shape means that they have a better chance at surviving the fall.
Hydrazine's truly nasty stuff. Any tank built to hold it safely would not be likely to vaporize during re-entry. In rocketry, hydrazine reactions often don't need an igniter, it spontaneously combusts, making it useful as liquid rocket propellant and simplifying rocket chamber design, especially for fine control thrusters.
It is very toxic, too.
originally posted by: FlyingFox
Most orbital trajectories lay near the equator.
originally posted by: SoulSurfer
a reply to: theantediluvian
Would this be so far-fetched? (video is self explanatory if you seen the movie)
originally posted by: JimOberg
originally posted by: FlyingFox
Most orbital trajectories lay near the equator.
Nope. The stuff circling near the equator is 40,000 km out, in 24-hour orbit. practically EVERYTHING else, in low orbit especially, revolves with inclinations above 30 degrees or so.
Remember the 'Northern Exposure' episode where Molly's boyfriend #62 was hit by a falling satellite? I miss that show [and the original music soundtrack, stripped off subsequent re-runs].
originally posted by: AdmireTheDistance
a reply to: trifecta
What is it like to live in a world of fantasy and delusion? Is it fun?
originally posted by: AdmireTheDistance
a reply to: trifecta
What is it like to live in a world of fantasy and delusion? Is it fun?
originally posted by: JimOberg
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: theantediluvian
Well, it certainly seems that the hydrazine storage tank theory is the one with the most legs, but these things seem to be falling to earth very much intact, if not in working order. I might be wise if future designs ensure a shape which is more prone to breaking up on contact with the atmosphere, because if a ball that size hits someone or something from orbit, it's going to smash whatever it hits to bloody ruin.
It is amazing to me that these things survived re entry, although I suppose being spherical in shape means that they have a better chance at surviving the fall.
Hydrazine's truly nasty stuff. Any tank built to hold it safely would not be likely to vaporize during re-entry. In rocketry, hydrazine reactions often don't need an igniter, it spontaneously combusts, making it useful as liquid rocket propellant and simplifying rocket chamber design, especially for fine control thrusters.
It is very toxic, too.
Precisely. When we were handling it we asked what it smelled like so we could run away and were told that by the time we could smell it we'd already inhaled a lethal dose, so it didn't matter. It was a nearly full and frozen tank of hydrazine aboard 'USA-193' military spy satellite some years ago that prompted the decision to use an anti-missile missile to disintegrate the vehicle in orbit rather than take the risk of the tank reaching the surface intact and leaking out in an area where people could be exposed.
ADD: Here's a story I did debunking a lot of media pretense and nonsense about that event:
www.thenewatlantis.com...
originally posted by: OnionHead
originally posted by: AdmireTheDistance
a reply to: trifecta
What is it like to live in a world of fantasy and delusion? Is it fun?
Ha, I thought it was some sort of epic sarcastic rant. A really good one at that
originally posted by: Konduit
If it's space junk like a hydrazine tank, then the odds of 2 of them falling near the same location on earth is like accidentally shooting the dots off a dice while blindfolded, from a moving vehicle.
Pretty strange is all I'm saying.
originally posted by: SeaWorthy
a reply to: theantediluvian
Related?
A hunk of space junk is headed for Earth and will plunge into our planet in about two and a half weeks. Right now, scientists predict it will crash-land on Friday the 13th (of November). Technically known as WT1190F, scientists have nicknamed it WTF—as in “WTF is this?”
www.newsweek.com...
If those have plastic surely they should be burned unless they fell from the floating city?