Washington DC Prepares for World War III

And boy are alone and amongst themselves in that endeavor for the first time in US history...

The US Military/US Government/NWO/TPTB has recently been talking tall at Congressional hearings last week about a big build-up to include new aircraft carriers, new nukes, better cyber security...for what?
The Navy testing in Los Angeles, Vandenberg AFB unannounced has only scared the American public, not China, Russia.

The first group to state their opposition to all this blustering is Worldwide Socialists.

A war between the United States and a major power like China or Russia, even if it were possible to prevent its escalation into an all-out nuclear exchange, would involve a colossal mobilization of the resources of American society, both economic and human. It would mean further dramatic reductions in the living standards of the American people, combined with a huge blood toll that would inevitably fall mainly on the children of the working class.

Read the whole article here: WSWS Org

No, I am not a Socialist...I am that new classification of American citizen fed-up with what has transpired over the Bush, Obama years and NOT supporting Reps/Dems with my vote.
I agree with everything in this article and by the comments at the bottom of the article I know their are millions just like me.

Is the American South going to be the next group to formally announce their total opposition to Wash DC insanity?

What other groups are you aware of that will make a stand?

a reply to: Granite

Is the US preparing to start WW3 or defend against enemies who are provoking? Yuge difference.

We need to go to a more defensive footing with regard to our foreign policy, IMO. Not a Ron Paul withdrawal from all foreign bases kind of footing, but certainly one where the US is much less of a bully in the middle east. The US has a power structure that includes the military industrial complex that loves to fight perpetual war and make lots of money. That has got to stop.

a reply to: Granite

Is the US preparing to start WW3 or defend against enemies who are provoking? Yuge difference.

We need to go to a more defensive footing with regard to our foreign policy, IMO. Not a Ron Paul withdrawal from all foreign bases kind of footing, but certainly one where the US is much less of a bully in the middle east. The US has a power structure that includes the military industrial complex that loves to fight perpetual war and make lots of money. That has got to stop.

originally posted by: HighDesertPatriot
a reply to: Granite

Is the US preparing to start WW3 or defend against enemies who are provoking? Yuge difference.

We need to go to a more defensive footing with regard to our foreign policy, IMO. Not a Ron Paul withdrawal from all foreign bases kind of footing, but certainly one where the US is much less of a bully in the middle east. The US has a power structure that includes the military industrial complex that loves to fight perpetual war and make lots of money. That has got to stop.

They are preparing to defend against "enemies" that are against NWO goals and that started in Ukraine a Bilderberg formula.
Their enemies are NOT mine.

a reply to: Granite

From your source article :"In the morning, the Senate Armed Services Committee held a lengthy hearing on cyberwarfare. In the afternoon, a subcommittee of the House Armed Services Committee discussed the present size and deployment of the US fleet of aircraft carriers, while another subcommittee of the same panel discussed the modernization of US nuclear weapons."

Isn't this what they do, all the time? They analyse, assess and then ask for money. I don't see how this says they are preparing for WWIII.

originally posted by: HighDesertPatriot
The US has a power structure that includes the military industrial complex that loves to fight perpetual war and make lots of money. That has got to stop.

Being as how it is the military industrial complex that controls the government along with the corporate support system.....

How is that going to stop? hint....it's not!

I thought the job of military leadership was to prepare for combat. That would be offensive and defensive. Any army that waits until after an attack to figure out a plan is in trouble.

originally posted by: reldra
a reply to: Granite
Isn't this what they do, all the time? They analyse, assess and then ask for money. I don't see how this says they are preparing for WWIII.

They do in this time of the physical year, yes.
But, have you read the article about on-going wars from Bush onward to include Obama...the guy who started the current Cold War?

Are you for business as usual?
Have you seen our debt?

Are Millennials going to pay this debt...fight more wars?

It's all blustering...

a reply to: HighDesertPatriot

I feel that maybe there are some in power in America that believe they need to maintain this military industrial complex due to the enemies they have created over the years. With such an aggressive and oppressive foreign policy poorly hidden behind the media propoganda it's enemies will not rest until it burns.
If America decided tomorrow to turn to a policy of pacifism do you not think those it has kept down will not rise up and take this as a sign of weakness?

I'm just trying to get a normal sense of reasoning behind this madness.

Chinese are going to try and get into everyones computer networks. Russian criminals will do that to make money. Marine technology (materials, hydrodynamics, radar systems, communications) is constantly advancing in both civilian and military fields. So most of that funding is fair.

I wonder what the chances are that the majority of vehicles could get a virus that makes them not run at all?

If a country was planning on defeating the usa then that would be their first strike before landing.

I really do wonder if the wh has thought of some of this?

I thought this is daily routine.

(shrugs)

Washington DC Prepares for World War III

It started back during WWII

originally posted by: liteonit6969
a reply to: HighDesertPatriot

I feel that maybe there are some in power in America that believe they need to maintain this military industrial complex due to the enemies they have created over the years. With such an aggressive and oppressive foreign policy poorly hidden behind the media propoganda it's enemies will not rest until it burns.
If America decided tomorrow to turn to a policy of pacifism do you not think those it has kept down will not rise up and take this as a sign of weakness?

I'm just trying to get a normal sense of reasoning behind this madness.

I think you are correct in a sense, but these constant wars have been aimless, with no exit strategy. The military just goes in and bombs some stuff, kills some people, then what? They linger for years getting blown up by IEDs? That's not a military strategy, that's called "stalling" until the pentagon can cook up the next dastardly enemy that the media can then sell to the sheep.

originally posted by: olaru12

originally posted by: HighDesertPatriot
The US has a power structure that includes the military industrial complex that loves to fight perpetual war and make lots of money. That has got to stop.

Being as how it is the military industrial complex that controls the government along with the corporate support system.....

How is that going to stop? hint....it's not!

I don't know how either, but it has to be addressed. Maybe dropping truth bombs until people wake up, like what is happening with the media right now.

originally posted by: Granite

originally posted by: HighDesertPatriot
a reply to: Granite

Is the US preparing to start WW3 or defend against enemies who are provoking? Yuge difference.

We need to go to a more defensive footing with regard to our foreign policy, IMO. Not a Ron Paul withdrawal from all foreign bases kind of footing, but certainly one where the US is much less of a bully in the middle east. The US has a power structure that includes the military industrial complex that loves to fight perpetual war and make lots of money. That has got to stop.

They are preparing to defend against "enemies" that are against NWO goals and that started in Ukraine a Bilderberg formula.
Their enemies are NOT mine.

I agree. The US government is the biggest threat to the American way of life and I suspect a lot of other ways of life.

I think the only difference between then and now is that now no one believes we'll back any of our threats with serious intent. Given our arsenal capability, that does make the world a more dangerous place. Just how far will foreign adversaries poke what they perceive to be a paper tiger that does have nukes?

originally posted by: deadeyedick
I wonder what the chances are that the majority of vehicles could get a virus that makes them not run at all?

If a country was planning on defeating the usa then that would be their first strike before landing.

I really do wonder if the wh has thought of some of this?

An EMP attack fries everything until it is re-produced with stone-age tech.

originally posted by: ketsuko
I think the only difference between then and now is that now no one believes we'll back any of our threats with serious intent. Given our arsenal capability, that does make the world a more dangerous place. Just how far will foreign adversaries poke what they perceive to be a paper tiger that does have nukes?

Precisely...

There is a new sheriff in town.
But, will the old sheriff realize it?

a reply to: Granite

I said it two years ago when I had the vision; the United States will find itself at war with Russia and China and will ultimately be overwhelmed on either coast of the country.