It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Tindalos2013
If these extraordinarily powerful images of a dead Syrian child washed up on a beach don't change Europe's attitude to refugees, what will?
originally posted by: anxiouswens
I think part of the problem has been that for way too many years we have been too liberal in this Country. We have allowed people to come to this Country and there are many who still don't speak any English or even attempt to. They bring their strict religious culture with them and don't want to assimilate or integrate. They choose to be surrounded with people who they feel safe with, people from their own culture. That is natural, but it should have been nipped in the bud a long time ago.
originally posted by: anxiouswens
They were born in Britain. They were educated and had everything that other children in Britain have had and yet they have still been radicalised. Jihad John (sorry for the label but I can never remember his real name) he is one of the most wanted and yet he is as British as you or me. He comes from a normal British family.
Already I am hearing that Oldham and Rochdale just a few miles from me are going to be taking a large bulk of the 20,000 who are coming. These areas already have a huge population who are immigrants. So once again the Government is doing exactly the same as it always has, the Government is allowing these people who are coming here to segregate themselves from British culture. Their children will no doubt go to a mainly muslim school and will very rarely mix with British school children. So in my opinion all the welcoming in the world is not going to change things. The children of these new arrivals should be put into schools where they will be a minority but will mix with other British children, so then at least the next generation will be more integrated etc.
originally posted by: Revolution9
a reply to: nonspecific
Well that is pretty hateful, saying your fellow is just an "expendable pawn" because they feel a certain way. You are just trying to shut people up, just as much as the system does, because they do not see things your way. You can not MAKE people conform to your standards of behaviour.
If I want to love something I will love it. If I want to HATE it I will hate it. It is up to me. It is my FREEDOM. Who are you or ANYONE else to say what I am allowed to love or hate? Are you God? No you are not. You are just another "expendable pawn" like me, though who is trying to shut people up because you do not like what they are saying and do not agree with it. That is why we have debate, so we all have a voice. You just want to take your opposition's voice away; low tactic.
Are the newest slur to be put onto the public by the liberal lefties is they are 'haters'
Haters, the newest insult and undermining label to anyone who doesn't toe the influx of unchecked refugees flooding our countries.
Its funny how name calling from the play ground suddenly gets into this game but its also propaganda to label and this heading for this thread is exactly that.
originally posted by: Shiloh7
Are the newest slur to be put onto the public by the liberal lefties is they are 'haters'
Haters, the newest insult and undermining label to anyone who doesn't toe the influx of unchecked refugees flooding our countries.
Its funny how name calling from the play ground suddenly gets into this game but its also propaganda to label and this heading for this thread is exactly that.
I am sorry for anyone who is so stupid and naive to think this is personally about the men, women and children trying to gate crash Europe and other countries for a better life. If Syria hadn't kicked off these huge numbers of people would actually have had pretty little excuse to try gate crashing the West - that's the long and the short of it, they are coming because they think the huge numbers give them a better chance of getting in.
Europeans have a right to be very wary about this because we don't have the jobs, spare housing and social services etc we also don't have the financial stability to take these people empty handed and provide every damn thing for them and their numbers are a threat to the stability to our society. Little mention is made of the medical cost of all this because certainly some are medically motivated. (yes you can't blame people, but it has to be funded to look after them and where is the extra money going to home from)?
However the biggest elephant in the room is Islamic fundamentalism. Muslims do not integrate and for a number of years in the UK we have been seeing the Saudi influence on muslims. They do not have regard for the values of the West, especially woman's rights. Many in the UK have never learned the language, live in Muslim only areas, social interaction, unless through the work is not on many's agenda.
People objecting to their coming is nothing to do with hatred its also not to do with assimilation, its a future fear of being outbred and taken over, again I say it has nothing to do with hating. Its more common sense, which in fact many who are welcoming these hoards are risking all our cultures and values, which we have fought hard over. People have a right to disagree with their government's stand on this because its government policy or a lack of it, that is the problem here - not people's attitudes. Were the world in flush financial times with everything necessary to spare e.g. jobs, money in budgets, spare housing and medical, educational facilities going begging - different world - not todays though.
originally posted by: OtherSideOfTheCoin
To me ATS seems to be splitting into two distinct groups.
We have a right wing conservative group and on the other side we have a much more progressive group and the two groups are clashing on just about everything. I do not know when it happened, i think it was a gradual thing but ATS is not a conspiracy forum any more rather it is more of a political forum.
I personally think that the Mods need to make some serious changes around here.
xenophobia
Syllabification: xen·o·pho·bi·a
Pronunciation: /ˌzenəˈfōbēə/
/ˌzēnəˈfōbēə/
Definition of xenophobia in English:
noun
Intense or irrational dislike or fear of people from other countries.
www.oxforddictionaries.com...
originally posted by: Nyiah
originally posted by: OtherSideOfTheCoin
To me ATS seems to be splitting into two distinct groups.
We have a right wing conservative group and on the other side we have a much more progressive group and the two groups are clashing on just about everything. I do not know when it happened, i think it was a gradual thing but ATS is not a conspiracy forum any more rather it is more of a political forum.
I personally think that the Mods need to make some serious changes around here.
It's been that way for a while. The difference is, the conservative side has been exponentially more vocal about "KILL THEM! KILL THEM ALL!" lately.
That's where people are going wrong. This is ATS, not Stormfront, You want to rant about wiping out the dirty sand people? Go do it ON STORMFRONT where that drivel belongs, among the rest of the knuckledraggers. I know full well there's no sign pointing our directing stating, "Stormfront, right over here!" It's time to quit emulating it.
xenophobia
Syllabification: xen·o·pho·bi·a
Pronunciation: /ˌzenəˈfōbēə/
/ˌzēnəˈfōbēə/
Definition of xenophobia in English:
noun
Intense or irrational dislike or fear of people from other countries.
www.oxforddictionaries.com...
ATS is supposed to be above that kind of BS. I agree that the staff needs to take a good, long hard look at what this site stands for, and figure out of this xenophobic route meshes. If not, it's time to buckle down & reaffirm what ATS originally set out to do. Discussion is one thing, cheering on death, abuse & hate is a cop-out for the weak & cowardly. This is not a platform for that crap, it's an alternative discussion forum.