It's time to wake up!

originally posted by: Itisnowagain
Yes, I agree that I cannot be proven to anyone - let's go round and round again!!!

So quit replying to my posts as if one of your yotube links is going to magically become proof.

originally posted by: daskakik

originally posted by: Itisnowagain
Yes, I agree that I cannot be proven to anyone - let's go round and round again!!!

So quit replying to my posts as if one of your yotube links is going to magically become proof.

So the BBC documentary went straight over your head?
Not a surprise.

www.youtube.com...

A song dedicated to this discussion so far.

originally posted by: Itisnowagain
So the BBC documentary went straight over your head?
Not a surprise.

Actually, no.

I still don't agree with your concept of no one.

That's that.

a reply to: Andy1144

Still not getting it?

It isn't about any concept in particular. It isn't about my proof or your proof.

It is about what people consider proof and how you can't change that.

a reply to: daskakik

I can only make my points providing evidence and if I am right and someone who understands comes along then great.

originally posted by: Andy1144
I can only make my points providing evidence and if I am right and someone who understands comes along then great.

And if not, you are not going to convince anyone anyway, if they don't think what you are providing is evidence so, why slip into the role of netevangelist?

a reply to: daskakik

Isn't that what your doing though? If you know you won't convince me then you know we'll go in circles, but your claiming that's not what your doing, so we'll still go in circles anyway.

You mentioned you don't agree with what's said. Do you agree there is no free will free from cause and effect? This is hard evidence claim.

a reply to: Andy1144

That is not hard evidence and I already posted why so, don't bother asking for an explanation. Let it go.

a reply to: daskakik

You agreed that experience is interpreted in the brain. Yet you don't agree there is no free will when it is clear in science.

a reply to: Andy1144

I'm not discussing that.

ETA: The only reason that I came back to the thread was to clear up that my point had nothing to do with "me being convinced".

a reply to: daskakik

Then what does it have to do with?

a reply to: Andy1144

Makes no difference to me.

a reply to: daskakik

Whats the aim of this conversation?

a reply to: Andy1144

My take is that you thought you had something to teach and I was trying to explain why that, sometimes, doesn't work out.

a reply to: daskakik

I am sure I would I agree on some level. When for example?

a reply to: Andy1144

Doesn't matter. My point is that it happens.

a reply to: daskakik

Well, going back to our talk a few posts ago, you agreed with the hard evidence I had provided with the brain for example. Do you agree with the statement "everything is cause and effect" is hard evidence? Yes or no, if no then why not?

originally posted by: Andy1144
Well, going back to our talk a few posts ago, you agreed with the hard evidence I had provided with the brain for example. Do you agree with the statement "everything is cause and effect" is hard evidence? Yes or no, if no then why not?

I don't think "everything is cause and effect" is a scientific term. It does sound like it would apply in most material situations.