Lesbian Couple Files Lawsuit After Hawaii Cop Arrested Them For Kissing

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
What's so bad/hard about explaining that two men can love each other?

Mommy and/or daddy find it icky.

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus
In a mall,while shopping with my kids? Fkn oath I would

a reply to: Krazysh0t

Umm no thanks ,Im not going to jam that tripe down my kids throats to try and make them think its normal......cause it is not.You can call me what you want,I have big shoulders and can handle that
Im not anti gay....and Im not pro gay....and i have good reasons for my stance on it........If Im out with my family and see gays being overly gay....I will say something....I have in the past and will in the future,so what?

originally posted by: hiddenNZ
In a mall,while shopping with my kids? Fkn oath I would

And what would you say? Please stop tongue-kissing that girl in the mouth? What would you do if they told you to eff off and mind your own business?

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

Nah i would just tell them there is a time and a place for that carry on.If I was told to f off,then chances are someone would be kissing through a rather large gap in their teeth.

originally posted by: hiddenNZ
Nah i would just tell them there is a time and a place for that carry on.

But if it were two dudes you would have an issue?

If I was told to f off,then chances are someone would be kissing through a rather large gap in their teeth.

You typically in the habit of violently assaulting people that you have verbally accosted when they tell you to mind your own business?

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus


yes I would have an issue,it may be publically accepted where you are,things are not the same where I am,also Id be trying not to puke in the middle of getting my words out.

No,I havnt verbally accosted anyone by saying "Get a room".......if Im told to f off,then thats another story....so is it Mind my own business or F off...or both?

originally posted by: hiddenNZ
yes I would have an issue,it may be publically accepted where you are,things are not the same where I am,also Id be trying not to puke in the middle of getting my words out.

Then I am confused as how you can possibly position yourself as something other than a homophobic bigot.

No,I havnt verbally accosted anyone by saying "Get a room".......if Im told to f off,then thats another story....so is it Mind my own business or F off...or both?

Two gay guys tell you to 'mind your own business' when you walk up to them and tell them to stop kissing because you have a serious case of nausea.

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

homophobic? Does that mean Im scared of gays.....nope Im definately not scared of any gay. Bigot? Sorry I know what that is,as im not gay,lol.

originally posted by: windword
a reply to: Krazysh0t

Hawaii's economy depends on tourism. They can't afford this kind of bad PR. This couple will get a huge payout settlement, ala the taxpayers. The police department won't suffer the loss of one penny over this incident.

That's why settlements need to come from the Police pension fund. Watch how quickly the 'blue wall of silence' is torn down, and suddenly overnight the same criminals with badges will be kicked off the force their heads faster than they can mutter 'union rep!"

originally posted by: hiddenNZ
homophobic? Does that mean Im scared of gays.....nope Im definately not scared of any gay.

Odd since two of them kissing would illicit such a visceral response from you such as vomiting.

Bigot? Sorry I know what that is,as im not gay,lol.

Probably a good thing considering your viewpoint of them.

ATTENTION!

The back and forth postings about each other stop

NOW!

Any further snipes and snarky posts will be removed and post bans handed out.

Stay on topic. Discuss the OP, not each other, and certainly keep the discussion civil.

Do not reply to this post.

Being against homosexuality is not the general consensus of hawaiians or the state of Hawaii. Homosexuality has been documented since the 1700's.

I would only agree with this officers determined escalation of this act if there were children or old ladies within immediate audio and visual sight of their pornographic behavior in public. I have no doubt he was disgusted with one or both making inappropriate moans and or groans. As if it was their personal pornography studio that the public just has to put up with cuz "oh were different, now watch me behave pornographically in front of your children" .

I see it too often and I may only be 30, but if there are kids around that arent even mine, I ask people to be respectful of decency when I see them behave this way. I see it too much with my own generation and the youngers. They feel like they won a cultural victory over society and now insist we have to put up with indecent behavior in public that is normally even inappropriate for a traditional "scientifically, biologically, and naturally correct" man woman interactions. Leave it to the love lorn teenagers that we can shoo away or tresspass. Adults should know how to behave decently in public.

Mr officer may have went overboard in any case. But if I was on the jury, I would determine not guilty either way.

a reply to: hiddenNZ

Well too bad for you then. It's a free country. It's not your business to tell them what they can't do. Especially if you aren't going to do the same to heterosexual couples.

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
Well too bad for you then. It's a free country. It's not your business to tell them what they can't do. Especially if you aren't going to do the same to heterosexual couples.

Some people do not see that and want the world to conform to their non-inclusive parameters. Are we all going to like everything we see other people do or say everyday? Probably not. But if it is not against the law how do you intend on dealing with the situation? Violence or with a rational approach?

originally posted by: AmericanRealist
Mr officer may have went overboard in any case. But if I was on the jury, I would determine not guilty either way.

So if it was demonstrated that the two women did not break the law in any way and that the officer was the one who violently escalated the situation without cause you would find him not guilt because: 'decency'?