It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Hillary Clinton’s poll numbers in head-to-head matchups with Republicans have fallen, and in a recent Quinnipiac University poll, only 37 percent of Americans considered her honest and trustworthy, compared with 52 percent for Jeb Bush.
Hillary Clinton's trust problem
The New Age, which is simply a blend of shamanism and pantheism, Hinduism, a big, big dash of Hinduism and some Buddhism, all the 'isms,' will eventually go into the direction which they all were designed to go into where you become one. The first step in becoming one is to convince the followers that everything and they'll use the term "illusion." It's an illusion, but what they really mean is it's not real at all. An illusion, remember, is a distortion of a reality, like looking through an old-fashioned pane glass window from the side. You'll get a distortion of a reality which is there, but what they're really telling you when they say illusion is that nothing is real whatsoever. That's the greatest trick of mind control. You lose your identity in such thinking. You lose your persona in such thinking and what they do in brainwashing is called "depersonalization," it's the first main step in brainwashing a victim. That's why they use this technique of saying nothing at all is real.
www.alanwattsentientsentinel.eu...
Note: If you copy and paste the link above into your browser's address bar, you can visit the article.
The purpose of psychological warfare is to conquer a people so that they never resist your domination. New Agers have been programmed the same way into believing that nothing is real anyway, everything's an illusion so don't be concerned with the aerial spraying, etc. Christians believe that to alter the evil which is coming would be to fight God himself, since it's God's plan. This is the typical impasse which psychological warfare programming takes succumbed individuals, thus rendering their survival instincts non-functional.
Alan answers your questionsedit on 29-10-2015 by Profusion because: (no reason given)
Christians believe that to alter the evil which is coming would be to fight God himself, since it's God's plan. This is the typical impasse which psychological warfare programming takes succumbed individuals…
originally posted by: kosmicjack
a reply to: EviLCHiMP
I grasp your meaning but....
For millennia humans have grouped together under certain parameters and constructs to ensure not only survival but peace and prosperity. Those parameters include taboos, rules of conduct, ethical codes, etc. The points the member makes seriously call those into question. IMHO. Sure, it can be argued that it's a touch hyperbolic but there's always a tipping point and many people think we've reached it.
What is that? IMHO, anyone trying to make that sound rational is trying to justify madness.
originally posted by: Hecate666
Humanity hasn't changed one iota and never will, the evidence is in the OP who throws transgenderism in with the dangers of Fukushima....please...my brain is hurting from so much naivite.
originally posted by: EviLCHiMP
originally posted by: kosmicjack
a reply to: EviLCHiMP
I grasp your meaning but....
For millennia humans have grouped together under certain parameters and constructs to ensure not only survival but peace and prosperity. Those parameters include taboos, rules of conduct, ethical codes, etc. The points the member makes seriously call those into question. IMHO. Sure, it can be argued that it's a touch hyperbolic but there's always a tipping point and many people think we've reached it.
Taboos, rules and codes were designed by the finite, fallible mind of individuals projecting their own conditioned ideas and concepts onto others. What is taboo to us is not taboo to the one performing it. What is a rule to us is not a rule to another. But there is great truth in your last sentence, what we think we believe, but why are we inclined to believe what we think? The moment the mind grasps subjectivity, the sense of individuality, it, as an effect, objectifies anything that it considers is not "self"; not being subjective to the mind that subjectifies itself.
If a tree were to subjectify itself it would no longer see its forest, only other trees to compete with.
These things can only make sense to a contemplative mind, please consider what they mean.